NBA trade grades: Is Peyton Watson a good fit with Cavs? What’s next for Nuggets?

Multiple sagas have been unfolding during the NBA offseason. One has been the Denver Nuggets potentially tightening payroll, even though their team has to find ways to remain near the top of the brutal Western Conference. Another has been the restricted free agency of Peyton Watson. And, of course, we have the Cleveland Cavaliers trying to become true contenders in the East and making sure they duck under the second-apron payroll threshold.

Advertisement

At least some of these things have been addressed. The Nuggets are sending Watson to Cleveland, where he will ink a four-year, $88 million deal. The Cavaliers are sending Max Strus to the LA Clippers and draft capital to Denver. They’re also sending the recently acquired Tre Mann to the Washington Wizards, with Cam Whitmore headed to Cleveland and Julian Reese headed to Denver. According to ESPN, which first reported the trade, last week’s reported Cavs-Hornets deal involving Mann and Dennis Schröder will make this a five-team transaction overall.

What does this all mean for the teams involved? Is there another deal to be made by the Nuggets? Is Cleveland getting the right guy with Watson? Let’s bust out the red ink and slap some grades on this trade.

Cavaliers receive Peyton Watson, Cam Whitmore

This move is a risk, but it’s one worth taking.

Watson saw a career season across the board (14.6 points, 4.9 rebounds, 2.1 assists and 49.1/41.1/73.0 shooting splits) during his 54-game campaign with Denver. But much of that bump in production was carried by a 17-game stretch in January and early February before his hamstring injury. During that stretch, Watson averaged 22.5 points, 5.6 rebounds, 2.8 assists, 1.1 steals, 1.4 blocks and 49.8/46.2/70.3 shooting splits. A lot of that production came while Nikola Jokić nursed a knee injury. Before that, Watson was having a modest season.

Do you believe Watson unlocked something during that stretch of games, or was it an aberration? We know Watson is a very good defender, and he’s been a respectable 3-point shooter in his brief career. It’s doubtful he’s a guy who can regularly average 20 points, but he did show there is potentially more to his game than previously seen. Cleveland has struggled to find wings next to Donovan Mitchell and whichever All-Star lead guard it’s employing alongside him. Watson should theoretically solve that problem.

Advertisement

The Cavs still need to re-sign James Harden, which will push them above the first-apron threshold of $209 million. It could have them just below the second apron as well.

Grade: B+

The most confusing team of the NBA offseason
Esfandiar Baraheni
{“@context”:”https://schema.org”,”@type”:”VideoObject”,”@id”:”https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/video/8hfqCgnQIuf4vQy/”,”url”:”https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/video/8hfqCgnQIuf4vQy/”,”name”:”The most confusing team of the NBA offseason”,”description”:”Esfandiar Baraheni breaks down the offseason moves made by the Los Angeles Lakers.”,”uploadDate”:”2026-07-17T16:09:20.467Z”,”duration”:”PT5M51S”,”thumbnailUrl”:”https://cdn-media.theathletic.com/video-stream/auto-thumbnail/8hfqCgnQIuf4vQy/tQOE70JQTi9K.0000000.jpg”,”contentUrl”:”https://video.nyt.com/athletic/streams/8hfqCgnQIuf4vQy/tQOE70JQTi9K/tQOE70JQTi9K.m3u8″,”transcript”:”No one understands what the Lakers did this summer. They spent over $260 million in just 35 minutes in free agency, completely hamstringing their salary cap for the next few seasons. But did you notice what they’re trying to accomplish? All of these confusing and imprudent moves are an attempt to completely revamp their roster around Luka Doncic and Austin Reeves. They re-signed Reeves to a 4-year, $185 million contract, locking him in as Luca’s partner in crime. Long term. They couldn’t afford to lose him. And if he didn’t get injured midway through last season, he probably would have made an All-Star team, averaging 23 points, 5 rebounds, and 5 assists. That’s how good he is. That said, Reeves isn’t very physical defensively and isn’t the best screen navigator either, constantly getting put in tough spots at the point of attack. And despite Lucas’s size, his struggles on the defensive end are well documented. So it’s fair to wonder whether the two of them can work long-term on defense. Last season, the Lakers found a way to win on that end when both guys were on the floor. They were actually better defensively when their duo played together than when they were off the court. Part of that was JJ Reddick morphing the Lakers into a zone-heavy defense, one that could shape-shift to cover the slow feet of Reeves and Luca on the perimeter while weaponizing their size in passing lanes to force turnovers. Still, building a successful defense around the duo will always be a hurdle, but building a dynamite. Offense is not. Similar to when Luka Dancic played alongside Kyrie Irving, Reeves can serve as a release valve scorer for the Slovenian superstar, working to attack the advantages that Dancic creates. And when Luka is off of the floor, Reeves’ ability to get to the foul line, work as a pick and roll ball handler, and be a lethal pull-up shooter makes him capable of torching bench-heavy lineups. And while they paid a steep price to retain him, in the Lakers’ minds, that’s the cost of doing business to satisfy. Luca. The same can be said for their big-time offseason edition, Walker Kessler. The Lakers have been searching the wilderness for their center of the future ever since they traded Anthony Davis in order to acquire Dancic. And in Kessler, they get a theoretical perfect fit, a 7’2, 24-year-old rebounding, shot-blocking, rim-running big man, exactly what this Lakers defense needs. In his last healthy season, Kessler was one of the 10 best rim. Sectors in the NBA limiting opponents to just 54.8% shooting at the rim. You can imagine a defense built around Kessler’s towering presence on the inside with him manning the paint, playing whack a mole for Reeves and Dancic, who could usher offensive players towards him. Even offensively, Kessler’s size, his screening ability, and his finishing at the basket is going to make for a perfect pairing next to Luca, who in the past has been able to get the most out of his big. Men. In theory, Kessler is perfect for the Lakers, but the cost may have been too high. The issue isn’t his newly signed 4-year, $130 million contract. The issue is that the Lakers also traded two unprotected first-round picks and two first-round pick swaps to the Jazz in order to sign Kessler. It’s the first time ever that a team has given up multiple first-round picks in a sign and trade situation. With this move and By re-signing Reeves, the Lakers are now committed to Kessler, Reeves, and Dancic for $475 million. They have exhausted their draft capital and realistically have no way to improve their roster without eventually trading one of their three cornerstone pieces, which means the Lakers must be confident that this group is complete enough to win a championship. And that’s hard to believe when you look at the rest of their signings. While Sandro Maukela. Collin Sexton, Quentin Grimes, and Zare Williams are all useful and talented players. It’s hard to call that a championship-ready roster. The Lakers succeeded defensively last season because of their defensive playmakers. LeBron James, Marcus Smart, and Rui Hachimura all provided versatility and size on the wings, making it harder for opposing offenses to penetrate. While Mamu, Sexton, and Grimes certainly provide ample offensive versatility and should help the Luca led Lakers into an offensive juggernaut. They lack the defensive versatility to really help this team win on that end. All of this puts a lot of pressure on Kessler to be the tide that raises all boats. And while he is good, no doubt, we just watch what happens when he’s asked to be the only good defender on a team with a bunch of defensive question marks. It’s called the Utah Jazz. The only difference is that the Lakers have a superstar in Luke Adan. Besides, Kessler isn’t without his questions. He hasn’t played more than 60 games in the last two seasons. How available he is will be massive, especially given that his backup is 30-year-old Kevon Looney. Essentially, Kessler has to be as good as, say, prime Rudy Gobert for this Lakers team to eventually reach its ceiling. And if he is, great. You’ve got yourself a championship contender. But if he’s anything less than that, even a hair less, You won’t be good enough. They are certainly poised to be a playoff team and have the offensive talent to win a bunch of regular season games. And to play devil’s advocate, all an NBA team needs is a chance, and armed with a superstar like Luca, the Lakers will always have a chance. And while they tried to boost their chances by revamping their roster this summer around him, there are now more questions than answers about the genuine ceiling of a team that is locked in long term. So it’s OK to not understand what the Lakers did this summer, because they took risks. We’ll see if they pay off.”,”ineligibleRegion”:[“BI”,”BY”,”CD”,”CF”,”CU”,”IQ”,”IR”,”KP”,”LB”,”LY”,”ML”,”NI”,”RU”,”SD”,”SO”,”SS”,”SY”,”UA”,”VE”,”YE”,”ZW”],”publisher”:{“@type”:”NewsMediaOrganization”,”@id”:”https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/#publisher”,”name”:”The Athletic”,”url”:”https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/”,”foundingDate”:”2016-01-25″,”logo”:{“@type”:”ImageObject”,”@id”:”https://theathletic.com/app/themes/athletic/assets/img/the-athletic-wordmark-black.png”,”url”:”https://theathletic.com/app/themes/athletic/assets/img/the-athletic-wordmark-black.png”,”contentUrl”:”https://theathletic.com/app/themes/athletic/assets/img/the-athletic-wordmark-black.png”,”creditText”:”The Athletic”,”height”:”60″,”width”:”435″},”publishingPrinciples”:”https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/edit-guidelines/”,”sameAs”:”https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Athletic”},”author”:[{“@type”:”Person”,”name”:”Esfandiar Baraheni”}]}

Nuggets receive 2031 first-round pick, 2032 second-round pick, Julian Reese

There’s an assumption out there that shedding Watson and his potential salary will open up the Nuggets to pursue and sign veteran DeMar DeRozan. If they’re able to sign DeRozan thanks to this deal, it bumps up the grade a little more.

{“endpoint”:”https://api-prd-nyt.theathletic.com/graphql”}

DeRozan would definitely help with some offense and shot creation. The problem, though, is the Nuggets aren’t really in need of a lot more offense. They need defenders. At this stage, DeRozan, who turned 37 earlier this month, isn’t exactly a top-notch defender. That’s where Watson staying in town would have actually helped, but the Nuggets were never going to pay him $22 million per season. Their offers to him were much lower, and he was seeking a deal in the neighborhood of what the team gave Christian Braun ($125 million over five years) before last season.

Denver does get a 2031 unprotected first-round pick from Cleveland. That’s a nice asset to have, especially if you believe Cleveland will fall apart enough in four years to make that pick more valuable. The Nuggets sent out their 2031 first-round pick when they moved Michael Porter Jr. to Brooklyn for Cam Johnson, so they’re getting a first back for that draft. Is it possible DeRozan (if signed) gives them more than Watson would’ve at a much cheaper salary? Absolutely. Is what DeRozan would/could give them what they need? I doubt that.

The 2032 second-round pick comes via Sacramento, and the Nuggets are expected to waive Reese’s two-way contract. We’ve already seen more criticism that the Nuggets will waste the remaining Jokić years. That thought will ease up a bit if they sign DeRozan, but I’m not sure this qualifies as keeping up with Oklahoma City and San Antonio in the West.

Grade: C

Clippers receive Max Strus

Strus battled injuries with Cleveland and has played in only 62 games over the last two seasons. When he’s healthy, he’s a very good 3-point shooter, someone who can attack a closeout and a solid defender. The Clippers need plenty of guys like that, and they’re giving up virtually nothing to get him.

Advertisement

Strus is entering the final year of his deal, making $16.6 million this season. He’ll either be a valuable wing for the Clippers as they navigate a post-Kawhi Leonard existence (assuming that trade with Toronto goes through). Or the Clippers will be able to flip Strus to a contender at the trade deadline and get back something of value. This is a pretty easy move for LA.

Pablo Torre sheds new light on the Kawhi Leonard / Clippers investigation
{“@context”:”https://schema.org”,”@type”:”VideoObject”,”@id”:”https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/video/5mJbSEhMAUdpdIj/”,”url”:”https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/video/5mJbSEhMAUdpdIj/”,”name”:”Pablo Torre sheds new light on the Kawhi Leonard / Clippers investigation”,”description”:”The Clippers had significant influence over Daktronics when the scoreboard-maker faced financial peril—and when Aspiration owed Kawhi.”,”uploadDate”:”2026-08-07T15:14:10.767Z”,”duration”:”PT2M21S”,”thumbnailUrl”:”https://cdn-media.theathletic.com/video-stream/auto-thumbnail/5mJbSEhMAUdpdIj/0JCW9QXY89py.0000000.jpg”,”contentUrl”:”https://video.nyt.com/athletic/streams/5mJbSEhMAUdpdIj/0JCW9QXY89py/0JCW9QXY89py.m3u8″,”transcript”:”I want to get to another way that Daktronics reminded me of aspiration, because by the spring of 2023, aspiration, you will recall, was on the road to bankruptcy and federal investigation. Following the whistleblower complaint, we obtained that detailed salary cap circumvention in writing under penalty of perjury. And around the same time, it turns out. Things weren’t going that great for Daktronics. I’m the Kobe Bryant of earnings calls. I’ll just watch this team play over and over and over again. And there was another moment I saw, I just kept rewinding, which is when the company’s audit committee chair, a member of the board, spoke up, which isn’t very common. It’s like seeing Tyler Coeli at the end of a game or something, and he was speaking because the company’s auditor had issued a dire warning. About the company’s ability to continue as a going concern, we unfortunately had to conclude that substantial doubt did exist. I will now hand the call over to. To be clear, a going concern warning is very bad. That meant that the company might go bankrupt within the next 12 months. Great time to sign a celebrity sponsor. And so just in terms of the influence that Steve Ballmer and the Clippers had over Daktronics and their operations in 2023, this is how my first source, the person under contract for the Clippers Intuit Dome Project, put it to me. If the Clippers told Daktronics to jump, they would say how high? Daktronics did a lot more than just survive. They went from being severely financially distressed to, as this 2024 Sportico headline suggests. The opposite. Scoreboard maker Daktronics hit 17-year high on Intuit Dome success. The stock went up 6 times between 2023 and today, and the Intuit Dome marked that bottom. That was the deal that really helped kickstart Daktronics and turn things around for them. Look, I don’t fully understand the difference between correlation and causation, but maybe it was a really good decision to pay Kawhi Leonard some money. At the very least a good decision to take a payment from Steve Ballmer and build the Intuit Dome, because the Intuit dome really did help save Daktronics. As far as I’m concerned, that might have been the greatest endorsement deal of all time.”,”ineligibleRegion”:[“BI”,”BY”,”CD”,”CF”,”CU”,”IQ”,”IR”,”KP”,”LB”,”LY”,”ML”,”NI”,”RU”,”SD”,”SO”,”SS”,”SY”,”UA”,”VE”,”YE”,”ZW”],”publisher”:{“@type”:”NewsMediaOrganization”,”@id”:”https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/#publisher”,”name”:”The Athletic”,”url”:”https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/”,”foundingDate”:”2016-01-25″,”logo”:{“@type”:”ImageObject”,”@id”:”https://theathletic.com/app/themes/athletic/assets/img/the-athletic-wordmark-black.png”,”url”:”https://theathletic.com/app/themes/athletic/assets/img/the-athletic-wordmark-black.png”,”contentUrl”:”https://theathletic.com/app/themes/athletic/assets/img/the-athletic-wordmark-black.png”,”creditText”:”The Athletic”,”height”:”60″,”width”:”435″},”publishingPrinciples”:”https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/edit-guidelines/”,”sameAs”:”https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Athletic”},”author”:[{“@type”:”Person”,”name”:”The Athletic Staff”}]}

Strus is a 37.0 percent 3-point shooter for his career and has been over 38 percent in three of the last five seasons. But he has to remain on the floor for that to be a positive for the Clippers. Either way, I like the swing.

Grade: A-

Wizards receive Tre Mann, 2027 second-round pick, cash

Mann has the potential to be a really good pickup.

We’ve seen flashes of him scoring in flurries, and at times, he’s a deadly 3-point shooter. However, he hasn’t shown enough in his career to consider him anything more than streaky. He had a very reduced role on Charlotte last season, as the Hornets became more serious about winning basketball games. He also shot the ball horribly pretty much the entire season. Mann is the type of guard the Wizards need off the bench. He might get you 15-20 points on any given night. He’ll push the young guys in practice and for minutes/role. The 25-year-old has also shown himself to be a capable passer and creator in certain spots.

Even though the Wizards have Trae Young and Anthony Davis, as well as Khris Middleton and Deandre Ayton, there is still a dearth of veteran presence on this roster. Most of the other guys are very young with little experience. Mann has played in only five seasons, totaling 234 games, but he did come from the OKC system, and the Thunder usually don’t bring in guys who can’t play and contribute. The Wizards are hoping to actualize that potential within their rotation.

Grade: B+


Analyse


Post not analysed yet. Do the magic.