{"id":334427,"date":"2018-06-22T12:35:00","date_gmt":"2018-06-22T09:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=334427"},"modified":"2018-06-22T12:35:00","modified_gmt":"2018-06-22T09:35:00","slug":"magistratii-iccj-raspuns-pentru-premierul-dancila-si-ministrul-toader-membrii-executivului-nu-au-caderea-sa-aprecieze-daca-o-hotarare-va-fi-mentinuta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=334427","title":{"rendered":"Magistra\u0163ii \u00ceCCJ, r\u0103spuns pentru premierul D\u0103ncil\u0103 \u015fi ministrul Toader: &#8220;Membrii Executivului nu au c\u0103derea s\u0103 aprecieze dac\u0103 o hot\u0103r\u00e2re va fi men\u0163inut\u0103&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"description\" data-key=\"description\">ICCJ precizeaz\u0103, dup\u0103 ce Viorica D\u0103ncil\u0103 \u015fi Tudorel Toader s-au pronun\u0163at \u00een cazul Dragnea, c\u0103 membrii Executivului sau Legislativului nu au c\u0103derea s\u0103 aprecieze \u00een ce m\u0103sur\u0103 o hot\u0103r\u00e2re judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 va fi men\u0163inut\u0103 \u015fi nici nu au competen\u0163a legal\u0103 de a constata c\u0103 aplicarea legii e sub influen\u0163a arbitrariului.<\/div>\n<div class=\"articleBody\" data-key=\"articleBody\">ICCJ precizeaz\u0103, dup\u0103 ce Viorica D\u0103ncil\u0103 \u015fi Tudorel Toader s-au pronun\u0163at \u00een cazul Dragnea, c\u0103 membrii Executivului sau Legislativului nu au c\u0103derea s\u0103 aprecieze \u00een ce m\u0103sur\u0103 o hot\u0103r\u00e2re judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 va fi men\u0163inut\u0103 \u015fi nici nu au competen\u0163a legal\u0103 de a constata c\u0103 aplicarea legii e sub influen\u0163a arbitrariului \u015fi c\u0103 a sus\u0163ine c\u0103 \u00cenalta Curte a \u00eenc\u0103lcat deciziile Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale \u00eenainte de a cunoa\u015fte con\u0163inutul \u015fi ra\u0163ionamentul logico-juridic al hot\u0103r\u00e2rii \u015fi arunc\u0103 \u00eendoiala asupra actului de justi\u0163ie.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Membrii Executivului sau Legislativului nu au c\u0103derea s\u0103 aprecieze \u00een ce m\u0103sur\u0103 o hot\u0103r\u00e2re judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 va fi men\u0163inut\u0103 sau nu \u00een c\u0103ile de atac \u015fi nici nu au competen\u0163a legal\u0103 de a constata c\u0103 aplicarea legii este sub influen\u0163a arbitrariului, toate aceste competen\u0163e apar\u0163in\u00e2nd instan\u0163elor de control judiciar sau Inspec\u0163iei Judiciare, atunci c\u00e2nd exist\u0103 indicii c\u0103 s-ar fi s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015fit o abatere disciplinar\u0103&#8221;, consider\u0103 ICCJ.<\/p>\n<p>Referindu-se la afirma\u0163iile ministrului Justi\u0163iei Tudorel Toader, instan\u0163a suprem\u0103 afirm\u0103 c\u0103 &#8220;a\u00a0sus\u0163ine c\u0103 \u00cenalta Curte a \u00eenc\u0103lcat deciziile Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale \u00eenainte de a cunoa\u015fte con\u0163inutul \u015fi ra\u0163ionamentul logico-juridic al hot\u0103r\u00e2rii nu poate sluji \u00een nici un fel la corecta informare a publicului \u015fi este de natur\u0103 a arunca \u00eendoiala \u015fi ne\u00eencrederea asupra actului de justi\u0163ie&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Instan\u0163a aminte\u015fte c\u0103 potrivit articolului 126 alineatul 1 din Constitu\u0163ia Rom\u00e2niei, justi\u0163ia se realizeaz\u0103 prin \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie \u015fi prin celelalte instan\u0163e judec\u0103tore\u015fti stabilite de lege.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Prin urmare, respectarea Constitu\u0163iei \u015fi a principiului separa\u0163iei puterilor \u00een stat impune ca justi\u0163ia s\u0103 se realizeze numai \u00een sala de judecat\u0103 \u015fi numai \u00een baza dispozi\u0163iilor constitu\u0163ionale ale legii.Derularea procedurilor judiciare \u00eentr-un stat de drept presupune faptul c\u0103 judec\u0103torii sunt singurii \u00een m\u0103sur\u0103 s\u0103 se pronun\u0163e asupra temeiniciei unei acuza\u0163ii, \u00een baza probelor aflate la dosar, dar \u015fi faptul c\u0103 orice analiz\u0103 asupra celor statuate \u00een prim\u0103 instan\u0163\u0103 nu poate fi realizat\u0103 dec\u00e2t prin intermediul c\u0103ilor de atac prev\u0103zute de lege&#8221;, aminte\u015fte ICCJ, preciz\u00e2nd c\u0103\u00a0a apreciat \u00eentotdeauna libertatea de exprimare dar reaminte\u015fte c\u0103, potrivit jurispruden\u0163ei CEDO, libertatea de exprimare nu are caracter absolut nici m\u0103car atunci c\u00e2nd este vorba de justi\u0163ie.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Apreciem \u00eendemnul la cump\u0103tare, dar ne \u00eendoim de sinceritatea unui astfel de demers atunci c\u00e2nd el este dublat de afirma\u0163ii potrivit c\u0103rora este evident c\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rile au fost politizate sau reprezint\u0103 un r\u0103spuns vindicativ la presiunea str\u0103zii.\u00a0Cump\u0103tarea, atunci c\u00e2nd este vorba de hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u015fti, presupune cunoa\u015fterea aprofundat\u0103 a procedurilor judiciare, dar, mai ales, a motiv\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rii judec\u0103tore\u015fti \u00een discu\u0163ie&#8221;, mai anun\u0163\u0103 judecv\u0103torii instan\u0163ei supreme.<\/p>\n<p>Liderul PSD, Liviu Dragnea, a fost condamnat joi la trei ani \u015fi \u015fase luni de \u00eenchisoare cu executare \u00een dosarul angaj\u0103rilor fictive de la Direc\u0163ia General\u0103 de Asisten\u0163\u0103 Social\u0103 \u015fi Protec\u0163ia Copilului (DGASPC) Teleorman, pentru instigare la abuz \u00een serviciu. El a fost achitat pentru infractiunea de fals intelectual. Decizia instan\u0163ei supreme nu este definitiv\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Premierul Viorica D\u0103ncil\u0103 sus\u0163ine c\u0103 sentin\u0163a \u00een cazul lui Liviu Dragnea &#8220;ne arat\u0103 c\u0103 modul \u00een care \u00een Rom\u00e2nia se aplic\u0103 legea este \u00eenc\u0103 sub influen\u0163a arbitrariului&#8221; \u015fi fapta pentru care a fost condamnat \u00een prim\u0103 instan\u0163\u0103 este prev\u0103zut\u0103 de un articol pentru care CCR a dat deja o decizie c\u0103 trebuie modificat, afirm\u00e2nd c\u0103 ea crede cu t\u0103rie \u00een nevinov\u0103\u0163ia liderului PSD \u015fi \u00eel asigur\u0103 de toat\u0103 sus\u0163inerea ei.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Ministrul Justi\u0163iei, Tudorel Toader, a declarat, vineri, la Ia\u015fi, c\u0103 nu poate comenta sentin\u0163a \u00een cazul liderului PSD Liviu Dragnea pentru c\u0103 nu a v\u0103zut motivarea, dar a auzit c\u0103 doi judec\u0103tori au f\u0103cut majoritate spre condamnare, c\u0103 \u201dn-au luat \u00een considerare decizia CCR\u201d. Acesta a explicat c\u0103 a f\u0103cut parte dintre judec\u0103torii Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale \u00een momentul \u00een care s-a stabilit c\u0103 abuzul \u00een serviciu exist\u0103 doar dac\u0103 s-au \u00eenc\u0103lcat prevederile unei legi sau ale unei ordonan\u0163e. \u201dNu cred c\u0103 un judec\u0103tor nu ia \u00een considerare o decizie a Cur\u0163ii\u201d, a spus Toader.<\/p>\n<p>Surs\u0103: News.ro\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> Source URL: https:\/\/observatornews.ro\/politic\/iccj-dupa-ce-dancila-si-toader-sau-pronuntat-in-cazul-dragnea-membrii-executivului-sau-legislativului-nu-au-caderea-sa-aprecieze-daca-o-hotarare-va-fi-mentinuta-258102.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ICCJ precizeaz\u0103, dup\u0103 ce Viorica D\u0103ncil\u0103 \u015fi Tudorel Toader s-au pronun\u0163at \u00een cazul Dragnea, c\u0103 membrii Executivului sau Legislativului nu au c\u0103derea s\u0103 aprecieze \u00een ce m\u0103sur\u0103 o hot\u0103r\u00e2re judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 va fi men\u0163inut\u0103 \u015fi nici nu au competen\u0163a legal\u0103 de a constata c\u0103 aplicarea legii e sub influen\u0163a arbitrariului. ICCJ precizeaz\u0103, dup\u0103 ce Viorica D\u0103ncil\u0103 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":334428,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[30],"class_list":["post-334427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","tag-observatornews-ro"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=334427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334427\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/334428"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=334427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=334427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=334427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}