{"id":31713,"date":"2022-06-30T10:58:11","date_gmt":"2022-06-30T07:58:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=31713"},"modified":"2022-06-30T10:58:11","modified_gmt":"2022-06-30T07:58:11","slug":"traian-basescu-ataca-la-ccr-legea-prin-care-a-ramas-fara-vila-de-protocol-si-protectie-spp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=31713","title":{"rendered":"Traian B\u0103sescu atac\u0103 la CCR legea prin care a r\u0103mas f\u0103r\u0103 vil\u0103 de protocol \u0219i protec\u021bie SPP"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry data-app-meta data-app-meta-article\" data-embed-base-url-canonical=\"https:\/\/www.digi24.ro\/embed\/stiri\/actualitate\/justitie\/traian-basescu-ataca-la-ccr-legea-prin-care-a-ramas-fara-vila-de-protocol-si-protectie-spp-1994549\">\n<p data-index=\"1\"><strong>Traian B\u0103sescu a atacat la Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 modific\u0103rile aduse Legii 406\/2001, prin care i-au fost retrase privilegiile cuvenite fo\u015ftilor pre\u015fedin\u0163i, respectiv <a href=\"https:\/\/www.digi24.ro\/stiri\/actualitate\/politica\/raapps-il-da-afara-pe-basescu-din-vila-de-protocol-1886533\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-skip-linkfix=\"1\">vila de protocol de la RA-APPS<\/a> \u015fi dispozitivul de protec\u0163ie al SPP.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-index=\"2\">Curtea de Apel Bucure\u015fti a admis o cerere a lui Traian B\u0103sescu \u015fi a dispus sesizarea CCR cu excep\u0163ia de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate privind o sintagm\u0103 din Legea 406\/2001, care prevede c\u0103 fo\u015ftii pre\u015fedin\u0163i \u00ee\u015fi pierd privilegiile dac\u0103 au \u00een justi\u0163ie o decizie definitiv\u0103 c\u0103 au colaborat cu fosta Securitate comunist\u0103, informeaz\u0103 Agerpres.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"3\">Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea a fost luat\u0103 \u00een cadrul unui proces \u00een care Traian B\u0103sescu a solicitat suspendarea deciziei SPP prin care i-a fost retras dispozitivul de protec\u0163ie. B\u0103sescu a pierdut \u00een prim\u0103 instan\u0163\u0103 procesul, \u00eens\u0103 a ob\u0163inut din partea Cur\u0163ii de Apel Bucure\u015fti sesizarea Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"4\">Dac\u0103 judec\u0103torii de la CCR vor declara neconstitu\u0163ionale modific\u0103rile aduse Legii 406\/2001, atunci Traian B\u0103sescu \u00ee\u015fi va rec\u0103p\u0103ta privilegiile.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"5\">Judec\u0103torul Amer Jabre, care a dispus sesizarea CCR, noteaz\u0103 de altfel c\u0103 exist\u0103 o \u201e\u00eendoial\u0103 serioas\u0103\u201d cu privire la constitu\u0163ionalitatea modific\u0103rilor aduse Legii 406\/2001, solicit\u00e2nd \u015fi analizarea unui articol din Codul administrativ.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"6\">\u201eAdmite cererea de sesizare a Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale. Sesizeaz\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 cu excep\u0163ia de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate privind: &#8211; art. 2, alin.1, lit.t si art.14, alin.1 din Legea nr.554\/2004, \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care se interpreteaz\u0103 \u00een sensul c\u0103 instan\u0163a de contencios administrativ nu poate dispune suspendarea execut\u0103rii unui act administrativ, atunci c\u00e2nd exist\u0103 o \u00eendoial\u0103 serioas\u0103 \u00een privin\u0163a constitu\u0163ionalit\u0103\u0163ii actului cu putere de lege \u00een baza c\u0103ruia a fost emis actul administrativ &#8211; Legea nr.243\/2021; &#8211; art.1, alin.3 din Legea nr.406\/2001, \u00een privin\u0163a sintagmei &#8220;\u015fi nici persoana despre care s-a constatat definitiv c\u0103 a avut calitatea de lucr\u0103tor al Securit\u0103\u0163ii sau de colaborator al acesteia&#8221;. Respinge cererea de suspendare a execut\u0103rii, ca ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103. Cu recurs, \u00een 5 zile de la comunicare\u201d, se arat\u0103 \u00een dispozitivul instan\u0163ei.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"7\">\u00cen calitate de \u015fef al statului, \u00een perioada 2004 &#8211; 2014, Traian B\u0103sescu beneficia de o serie de privilegii: a primit \u00een folosin\u0163\u0103 gratuit\u0103 o vil\u0103 de protocol pe strada Gogol din Sectorul 1 al Capitalei, avea indemniza\u0163ie \u015fi dispozitiv de protec\u0163ie \u015fi paz\u0103 de la SPP.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"8\">\u00cen octombrie 2021, Legea 406\/2001 privind acordarea unor drepturi persoanelor care au avut calitatea de \u015fef al statului rom\u00e2n a fost modificat\u0103 (prin Legea nr. 243\/2021), fiind introdus un nou articol care prevede c\u0103 fo\u015ftii pre\u015fedin\u0163i pierd dreptul la aceste beneficii dac\u0103 o instan\u0163\u0103 a constatat prin decizie definitiv\u0103 c\u0103 au avut calitatea de lucr\u0103tor al Securit\u0103\u0163ii sau de colaborator al acesteia.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"9\">Traian B\u0103sescu a primit \u00een luna martie, la Instan\u0163a suprem\u0103, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.digi24.ro\/stiri\/actualitate\/justitie\/traian-basescu-verdict-definitiv-de-colaborare-cu-securitatea-iccj-1881425\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-skip-linkfix=\"1\">o decizie definitiv\u0103 c\u0103 a fost colaborator al Securit\u0103\u0163ii<\/a> \u0219i a fost nevoit s\u0103 p\u0103r\u0103seasc\u0103 vila de protocol, iar SPP l-a anun\u0163at pe fostul pre\u0219edinte c\u0103 nu mai beneficiaz\u0103 de dreptul la protec\u0163ie \u015fi paz\u0103.<\/p>\n<p> Editor : <a href=\"https:\/\/www.digi24.ro\/autor\/mihnea-lazar\"> M.L. <\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> Source URL: https:\/\/www.digi24.ro\/stiri\/actualitate\/justitie\/traian-basescu-ataca-la-ccr-legea-prin-care-a-ramas-fara-vila-de-protocol-si-protectie-spp-1994549<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Traian B\u0103sescu a atacat la Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 modific\u0103rile aduse Legii 406\/2001, prin care i-au fost retrase privilegiile cuvenite fo\u015ftilor pre\u015fedin\u0163i, respectiv vila de protocol de la RA-APPS \u015fi dispozitivul de protec\u0163ie al SPP. Curtea de Apel Bucure\u015fti a admis o cerere a lui Traian B\u0103sescu \u015fi a dispus sesizarea CCR cu excep\u0163ia de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate privind [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":31714,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[11],"class_list":["post-31713","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","tag-digi24"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31713","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31713"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31713\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/31714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31713"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31713"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31713"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}