{"id":2126140,"date":"2026-09-03T12:00:59","date_gmt":"2026-09-03T09:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=2126140"},"modified":"2026-09-03T12:00:59","modified_gmt":"2026-09-03T09:00:59","slug":"the-clippers-are-busted-inside-the-wachtell-report-and-the-penalties-adam-silver-chose","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=2126140","title":{"rendered":"The Clippers are busted: Inside the Wachtell report and the penalties Adam Silver chose"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"Article_ContentContainer__jBNW3 article-content-container bodytext1\">\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Caught. Nabbed. Busted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">The LA Clippers spent the last year insisting they had nothing to fear from an NBA investigation into cap circumvention and that everything would be fine.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Narrator voice: Everything was not fine. A half-decade-old scheme to funnel extra money to Kawhi Leonard has come to light, with the help of an investigative report from the \u201cPablo Torre Finds Out\u201d podcast, and the Clippers are <em>screwed<\/em>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad-container\">\n<div class=\"ad-wrapper article-treatment\">\n<div class=\"ad-slug-container\">\n<p class=\"ad-slug\">Advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mid1\" data-position=\"mid1\" class=\"ad place-ad\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">First, the basics. After a yearlong investigation that culminated in a 35-page summary report from the law firm of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz, the league <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7513882\/2026\/09\/02\/clippers-kawhi-leonard-punishment-fine-suspensions-nba-investigation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">brought down the hammer<\/a> on the Clippers on Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">For what it deemed were four separate instances of violating the league\u2019s collective bargaining agreement by engaging in cap circumvention to fill the pockets of star forward Kawhi Leonard from 2020 to 2022, the league stripped the Clippers of five first-round picks, fined the team $30 million, suspended owner Steve Ballmer and president of business operations Gillian Zucker for a full year and suspended president of basketball operations Lawrence Frank for six months. Leonard was also required to pay the league $700,000 in unreimbursed expenses, and his agent at the time, Dennis Robertson (aka \u201cUncle Dennis\u201d), was banned from the NBA five years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Clippers, for their part, have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7560693\/2026\/09\/02\/clippers-nba-investigation-witch-hunt-steve-ballmer\/?unlocked_article_code=1.-VA.uWSe.q283NTlaYfro&amp;source=emp_shared_article&amp;smid=url-share-ta\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">stuck to their story<\/a> and vowed to keep fighting, but it is not clear how. There is no appeals process for this, and courts generally give leagues wide latitude to enforce their own rules.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">What\u2019s more, the information in the Wachtell report is damning, and the Clippers\u2019 only attempt at a factual refutation has been to call it a \u201cwitch hunt.\u201d Also, it was common knowledge through the league that Uncle Dennis <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/1481876\/2019\/12\/23\/improper-requests-an-investigation-and-a-superstar-chase-gone-sideways-the-untold-stories-from-kawhi-leonards-free-agency-that-left-the-lakers-fuming\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">was asking for preposterous and blatantly illegal side benefits<\/a> in the summer of 2019, which Leonard then began receiving in 2020 ahead of his next free agency, according to the report.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">To say the burden of proof is now on the Clippers would be a massive understatement.<\/p>\n<div data-ath-video-stream=\"6cLwrbBE8PGZJTx\">\n<div class=\"VideoHost_Root__QeM_i\">\n<div class=\"VideoHost_VideoWidth__XjNKI VideoHost_Portrait__XBaJC\">\n<div class=\"VideoTitleFrame_Root__AGckL\">\n<div>\n<div class=\"VideoTitleFrame_Title__npf3B\">The Kawhi Saga: What the NBA&#8217;s investigation into the Clippers revealed<\/div>\n<div class=\"VideoTitleFrame_Authors__jxyYV\">Mike Vorkunov and Jeshua Kidd<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"VideoTitleFrame_VideoWrapper__Xgp47\">\n<div class=\"AspectRatioBox_root__AKv5b\" style=\"aspect-ratio:9 \/ 16;max-height:min(100%)\">\n<div class=\"AspectRatioBox_inner__86C_2\" style=\"aspect-ratio:9 \/ 16\">\n<div class=\"VideoStreamPlayer_GridStack__2H0p2\"><video preload=\"metadata\"><\/video><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Regarding the lack of appeals process, an important clarification is in order, because my initial understanding of the NBA investigation\u2019s endgame was incorrect. Article XIII, Section 3 of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbpa.com\/cba\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Collective Bargaining Agreement<\/a> was misunderstood by me and others, including people I know with legal backgrounds, to allow for a system arbitrator to hear a case before penalties for cap circumvention may be levied by the commissioner.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad-container\">\n<div class=\"ad-wrapper article-treatment\">\n<div class=\"ad-slug-container\">\n<p class=\"ad-slug\">Advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mid2\" data-position=\"mid2\" class=\"ad place-ad\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">That particular part <em>only<\/em> applies to penalties applied to a player, <em>not<\/em> to a team or its management, something that is poorly explained in this section (page 340 of the CBA), but is spelled out in the document clearer in Article XXXII (not until page 470, but in a gripping romp like this tome, it feels sooner).<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Because Leonard and the NBA Players Association signed off on his repaying $700,000, there was no further process that would require an arbitrator. Leonard, who made tens of millions in off-the-books, no-show endorsements, made out like a bandit with this settlement, especially since his $51 million contract for the coming season was not voided.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">The only relevant remaining section of Article XIII is the part that describes the penalties for cap circumvention. The menu Adam Silver had to choose from includes:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Imposing a fine of up to $7.5 million<\/li>\n<li>Directing the forfeiture of draft picks<\/li>\n<li>Suspending any team personnel for up to one year<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">It is notable that Silver chose to max out the potential penalties. A notion circulated for much of the last year that Ballmer might be able to \u201cplea bargain\u201d this down to a fine and lose two first-rounders, or something of that ilk.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Not so much. While the fine is the least impactful part from a basketball and material perspective, it\u2019s notable because the league implemented the maximum financial penalty four times over because it found four violations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Similarly, Ballmer and Zucker were suspended for a year because they can\u2019t be suspended any longer. (The Wachtell report casts a harsh light on Zucker, in particular.) <em>Five<\/em> first-round picks? There were only five that the Clippers owned free and clear with no strings, although the league could theoretically have forfeited a couple of swaps, as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">The draft picks are from 2029 to 2033, partly because the Clippers already traded their 2028 first and swapped their 2027 pick. The Clippers\u2019 2029 swap with the Philadelphia 76ers is unaffected, as the penalty from the league cost them their 2029 pick from the Indiana Pacers instead.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad-container\">\n<div class=\"ad-wrapper article-treatment\">\n<div class=\"ad-slug-container\">\n<p class=\"ad-slug\">Advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mid3\" data-position=\"mid3\" class=\"ad place-ad\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">(Side note: The Clippers clearly were either unaware or in denial about how deeply they were in trouble, or they would have spent last season trading all their firsts while the Wachtell investigation meandered. Instead, they received two firsts from Indiana in the Ivica Zubac trade, one of which became 2026 lottery pick Keaton Wagler and the other was forfeited in this punishment).<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Since the Clippers are still fighting in the court of public opinion, let\u2019s make one thing clear: I believe virtually anyone who has worked in the league will agree that the Wachtell report absolutely hammered them, dead to rights. The Clippers make this sound like a case of somebody forgetting to put a cover sheet on their <a href=\"http:\/\/youtube.com\/watch?v=Fy3rjQGc6lA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">TPS reports<\/a>, but the document shows a systematic process that yielded four different counts of circumvention.<\/p>\n<div data-ath-video-stream=\"b0a6D2NlXOUPVZj\">\n<div class=\"VideoHost_Root__QeM_i\">\n<div class=\"VideoHost_VideoWidth__XjNKI VideoHost_Portrait__XBaJC\">\n<div class=\"VideoTitleFrame_Root__AGckL\">\n<div>\n<div class=\"VideoTitleFrame_Title__npf3B\">&#8220;This is the largest punishment in the history of the NBA.&#8221;<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"VideoTitleFrame_VideoWrapper__Xgp47\">\n<div class=\"AspectRatioBox_root__AKv5b\" style=\"aspect-ratio:9 \/ 16;max-height:min(100%)\">\n<div class=\"AspectRatioBox_inner__86C_2\" style=\"aspect-ratio:9 \/ 16\">\n<div class=\"VideoStreamPlayer_GridStack__2H0p2\"><video preload=\"metadata\"><\/video><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let me get into this text and some of my own front-office experience to explain:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">The report starts by outlining how the league browbeats front offices with memos and other communication about cap circumvention and what qualifies, which is absolutely correct. You would have to be obtuse to work in an NBA front office for any length of time and not understand the rules on this \u2014 especially as a player-facing front-office executive, and <em>especially<\/em> an executive for a team previously found guilty of a fishy side-deal violation (during DeAndre Jordan\u2019s 2015 free agency, for which the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/los-angeles-clippers-fined-deandre-jordan-free-agency-endorsements-2015-8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Clips were fined $250,000<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">It then gets into the bizarre PR release from the Clippers two weeks ago:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>On August 17, 2026, the Clippers appeared to double down on this theory by <\/em><em>issuing a carefully worded public statement in defense of the team\u2019s actions, asserting <\/em><em>that \u201c[m]aking introductions between players and team partners is both an ordinary <\/em><em>practice by NBA teams and a common request of players and representatives.\u201d To the <\/em><em>extent these independent contentions were intended to imply that NBA rules permit <\/em><em>teams, at the request of players, to initiate off-court income opportunities for players, that <\/em><em>implication is incorrect. In any case, as set forth further below, the Clippers\u2019 misconduct <\/em><em>here extended far beyond simply initiating these opportunities.<\/em><\/p>\n<p id=\"article-pickem\">\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let me add some insider color on this. I can\u2019t vouch for anyone else\u2019s experience, but in seven years with the Memphis Grizzlies, this \u201cordinary practice\u201d happened with me zero times \u2026 probably because, as the report notes, it\u2019s illegal, and everyone knows this. Teams are periodically reminded about that by the league in case they forgot. There was one time in my tenure that the topic even came up, and it was immediately communicated to the person who asked it would be blatant cap circumvention that would put us at risk of getting \u201cJoe Smithed\u201d by the league office.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Later in the document we get to some of the meat of the cap circumvention:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>According to contemporaneous notes kept by Mr. Frank:<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>Mr. Robertson complained to Mr. Ballmer that Ms. Zucker was making \u201cintroductions\u201d for \u201cbull\u2014- deals,\u201d and that \u201cI [Mr. Robertson] cant [sic] wait on [Ms. Zucker] \u2014 I have to get <\/em><em>paid.\u201d<\/em><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>Mr. Ballmer responded by telling Mr. Robertson that he and Clippers\u2019 personnel were all \u201ccollective workers to try to help [Mr. Leonard] achieve his financial goals,\u201d\u2018 and Ms. Zucker assured Mr. Robertson that Mr. Ballmer would \u201cfollow through on his promise.\u201d<\/em><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>Mr. Robertson requested a \u201c3-6 month plan\u201d for more lucrative introductions from the Clippers, a list of \u201c5-6 companies\u201d in the \u201cpipeline\u201d for \u201cpotential introductions,\u201d and more frequent and consistent communication from Ms. Zucker.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Those who know Frank had to at least chortle in recognition, because he might be the league\u2019s most scrupulous notetaker. Bad beat for the Clippers there. But it\u2019s also the key exchange that sets up everything the report goes on to document. Also, the second Robertson started pushing for illegal benefits, the Clippers were required to notify the league, and they didn\u2019t. It\u2019s all downhill from there.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad-container\">\n<div class=\"ad-wrapper article-treatment\">\n<div class=\"ad-slug-container\">\n<p class=\"ad-slug\">Advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mid4\" data-position=\"mid4\" class=\"ad place-ad\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">By Page 15, we are already dripping in sarcasm, thanks to the mountain of circumstantial evidence towering over the Clippers\u2019 case \u2014 in particular, the team\u2019s cover story for how the endorsements got off the ground:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>Investigators do not credit the suggestion in the \u201cintroduction\u201d emails that each of these companies in fact requested to be introduced to Mr. Leonard within six days of each other, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, and while the NBA season was suspended.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">One factor in the harsh penalty for the Clippers seems to be that their cooperation and truthfulness seemed, based on the Wachtell report, something short of optimal, particularly in Zucker\u2019s case. The report asserts flatly that Zucker wasn\u2019t truthful and danced around the same accusation regarding Ballmer. (The report\u2019s introduction, in contrast, states Frank was forthcoming).<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Witness:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>In the September 5, 2025 television interview referenced above, Mr. Ballmer said this in defending the Clippers\u2019 conduct related to Aspiration: \u201c[W]e even found the email that makes the first introduction. <\/em><em>It was early November, I won\u2019t remember the exact date. So where, where could any of this circumvention have happened? It didn\u2019t. It couldn\u2019t have. The introduction got made and then <\/em><em>they were off to the races on their own. We weren\u2019t involved.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>Mr. Ballmer and Ms. Zucker told investigators the same: that the Clippers\u2019 sole involvement in Mr. Leonard\u2019s relationship with Aspiration was an introductory email. Based on the foregoing evidence, investigators find these statements to be inaccurate (at best) with respect to Mr. Ballmer and clearly false with respect to Ms. Zucker.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yikes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">From there, the report lays out how the four endorsement deals came to pass and follows the money back to the Clippers in each case, as well as tracking the timing of each and, as in the text above, noting the clear conflicts with the team\u2019s cover story.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">TL;DR: Busted.<\/p>\n<div id=\"inline-graphic\">\n<p>        a.showcase-link-container {<br \/>\n  display: flex;<br \/>\n  gap: 20px;<br \/>\n  flex-direction: column;<br \/>\n  align-items: center;<br \/>\n  padding: 20px 0px;<br \/>\n  border-top: 1px solid rgba(150, 150, 147, 0.4);<br \/>\n  border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(150, 150, 147, 0.4);<br \/>\n  text-decoration: none;<br \/>\n  color: #121212;<br \/>\n  cursor: pointer;<\/p>\n<p>  .showcase-link {<br \/>\n    font-family: nyt-franklin;<br \/>\n    font-size: 14px;<br \/>\n    font-style: normal;<br \/>\n    font-weight: 700;<br \/>\n    line-height: 13.8px;<br \/>\n    letter-spacing: 1.1px;<br \/>\n    text-transform: uppercase;<br \/>\n  }<\/p>\n<p>  .showcase-link-image {<br \/>\n    border-radius: 8px;<br \/>\n    object-fit: cover;<br \/>\n    width: 200px;<br \/>\n    height: 150px;<br \/>\n    margin: 0px;<br \/>\n    @media (max-width: 600px) {<br \/>\n      width: 120px;<br \/>\n      height: 120px;<br \/>\n    }<br \/>\n  }<\/p>\n<p>  .showcase-link-inner-content {<br \/>\n    display: flex;<br \/>\n    flex-direction: row;<br \/>\n    gap: 16px;<br \/>\n    width: 100%;<br \/>\n  }<\/p>\n<p>  .showcase-link-text-content {<br \/>\n    display: flex;<br \/>\n    flex-direction: column;<br \/>\n    gap: 20px;<br \/>\n    justify-content: center;<br \/>\n    @media (max-width: 600px) {<br \/>\n      gap: 8px;<br \/>\n    }<br \/>\n  }<\/p>\n<p>  .showcase-link-title {<br \/>\n    font-family: nyt-cheltenham;<br \/>\n    font-size: 24px;<br \/>\n    font-style: normal;<br \/>\n    font-weight: 500;<br \/>\n    line-height: 120%; \/* 24px *\/<br \/>\n    letter-spacing: 0.01px;<br \/>\n    text-overflow: ellipsis;<br \/>\n    overflow: hidden;<br \/>\n    display: -webkit-box;<br \/>\n    -webkit-box-orient: vertical;<br \/>\n    -webkit-line-clamp: 3;<br \/>\n    @media (max-width: 600px) {<br \/>\n      font-size: 16px;<br \/>\n    }<br \/>\n  }<\/p>\n<p>  .showcase-link-excerpt {<br \/>\n    font-family: nyt-imperial;<br \/>\n    font-size: 16px;<br \/>\n    font-style: normal;<br \/>\n    font-weight: 400;<br \/>\n    line-height: 139%; \/* 19.46px *\/<br \/>\n    color: #323232;<br \/>\n    text-overflow: ellipsis;<br \/>\n    overflow: hidden;<br \/>\n    display: -webkit-box;<br \/>\n    -webkit-box-orient: vertical;<br \/>\n    -webkit-line-clamp: 4;<br \/>\n    @media (max-width: 600px) {<br \/>\n      font-size: 12px;<br \/>\n      line-height: 121%;<br \/>\n    }<br \/>\n  }<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>.showcase-link-inputs {<br \/>\n  .showcase-link-input {<br \/>\n    width: 100%;<br \/>\n    font-size: 1rem;<br \/>\n    background-color: white;<br \/>\n    margin-bottom: 12px;<br \/>\n  }<\/p>\n<p>  .showcase-link-indent {<br \/>\n    margin-left: 25px;<br \/>\n  }<\/p>\n<p>  option {<br \/>\n    width: 100%;<br \/>\n  }<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {<br \/>\n  .native-mobile a.showcase-link-container {<br \/>\n    background-color: #121212;<br \/>\n    color: #f0f0ee;<br \/>\n    .showcase-link-excerpt {<br \/>\n      color: #c4c4c0;<br \/>\n    }<br \/>\n  }<br \/>\n}<\/p>\n<p>            \/\/ Remove all onclicks on imgs for apps to prevent image zoom on click<br \/>\n            document.querySelectorAll(&#8216;.showcase-link-image&#8217;).forEach((img) =&gt; img.removeAttribute(&#8216;onclick&#8217;));<\/p>\n<p>        <a id=\"showcase-link-7560457\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7560457\/2026\/09\/02\/clippers-aspiration-punishment-kawhi-leonard-steve-ballmer\/\" class=\"showcase-link-container in-content-module-link testbed-shortcode\" data-shortcode-id=\"101\" data-shortcode-string=\"showcase-link\" data-content-id=\"7560457\" data-content-post-type=\"article\"><\/p>\n<div class=\"showcase-link\">What You Should Read Next<\/div>\n<div class=\"showcase-link-inner-content\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/athletic\/uploads\/wp\/2026\/09\/02181929\/GettyImages-2243507107-scaled-e1788387599965-1024x683.jpg?width=400&amp;quality=70\" alt=\"What to know about NBA\u2019s punishment of Clippers, Kawhi Leonard\" class=\"showcase-link-image\" width=\"200\" height=\"200\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/p>\n<div class=\"showcase-link-text-content\">\n<div class=\"showcase-link-title\">\n                  What to know about NBA\u2019s punishment of Clippers, Kawhi Leonard\n              <\/div>\n<div class=\"showcase-link-excerpt\">\n                  Following the NBA&#8217;s investigation against the LA Clippers, here\u2019s what known about each part of the penalty.\n              <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>        <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Silver had discretion in how to penalize these violations, and he hammered the Clippers. He <em>had to<\/em>. Twenty-nine other owners would have been varying shades of furiousness if he hadn\u2019t, especially with this much evidence. Even setting that aside, Silver had to disincentivize this type of behavior in the future.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad-container\">\n<div class=\"ad-wrapper article-treatment\">\n<div class=\"ad-slug-container\">\n<p class=\"ad-slug\">Advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mid5\" data-position=\"mid5\" class=\"ad place-ad\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">That\u2019s because what\u2019s done is done: The Clippers still got seven years* of superstar play from Leonard, and we have no idea if that would have happened if not for the assorted circumventions outlined here. All the teams they beat still took home an L.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>(* \u2014 He did miss half the games, but still.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">In line with that, there was one penalty not mentioned in the CBA that I would have loved to see: restitution to the Dallas Mavericks and Utah Jazz, the two teams the Clippers beat in the 2021 playoffs while, according to the Wachtell report, funneling Leonard an additional $18 million off the books.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">They can\u2019t undo the scores of the games, and the NBA doesn\u2019t really do \u201cvacated wins\u201d like the NCAA, but let\u2019s not pretend this didn\u2019t have an impact. Losing to the Clippers was the precursor to the Jazz blowing up their team a year later; Utah only came out of hibernation this past summer. Dallas changed coaches after losing to the Clippers in a tough seven-game series in the first round, although it worked out well for Rick Carlisle. Either squad could have plausibly won the 2021 Western Conference in a relatively down year.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">That season\u2019s trip to the West finals, alas, underscores what a disaster the Leonard era has been for this franchise, even as Leonard generally played amazingly. The Clippers\u2019 price for signing Leonard was a simultaneous trade for Paul George that cost them five first-round picks, two swaps and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. The shenanigans with Leonard and Uncle Dennis just cost them an additional five firsts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thus, while the Clippers in 2021 made the conference finals for the first and only time in franchise history, they effectively traded a two-time MVP and <em>10\u00a0firsts<\/em> to win three playoff series in seven years \u2014 and were realistic contenders in only two of the seven.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Now what? It\u2019s hard to believe given the team\u2019s pre-Ballmer history, but the Clippers are working on a streak of 15 straight winning seasons. They might not have another for some time.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad-container\">\n<div class=\"ad-wrapper article-treatment\">\n<div class=\"ad-slug-container\">\n<p class=\"ad-slug\">Advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mid6\" data-position=\"mid6\" class=\"ad place-ad\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Step one is figuring out who is even in charge. With the owner and president of basketball operations both suspended, one presumes that general manager Trent Redden is now holding the conch. His first order of business is likely completing the agreed-to trade of Leonard to Toronto, which the Clippers have even more incentive to finish given that the Raptors are sending them much-needed draft picks in 2031 and 2033, as well as a pick swap in 2027. (The Clippers, ironically, now would benefit hugely if Leonard faceplants as a Raptor.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Otherwise, this feels like a franchise in limbo. The Clippers missed the playoffs last season, don\u2019t control their own draft pick until Darius Garland is 34 years old(!), and their biggest offseason move other than the Leonard trade was letting a 24-year-old guard walk so they could retain 33-year-old Bradley Beal and trade for 30-year-old Max Strus. Frank\u2019s suspension will carry through the trade deadline, but it would be hard for Redden or whoever is in charge to make significant moves regardless.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Clippers, however, do have cap room in 2027 and will likely have abundant space in the summer of 2028. With little in the way of young players or draft capital aside from Wagler, scoring a big star in free agency is probably their best hope of digging themselves out of this mess in the next decade or so. Let\u2019s hope that the money they offer above the table will be enough this time.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Caught. Nabbed. Busted. The LA Clippers spent the last year insisting they had nothing to fear from an NBA investigation into cap circumvention and that everything would be fine. Narrator voice: Everything was not fine. A half-decade-old scheme to funnel extra money to Kawhi Leonard has come to light, with the help of an investigative [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[226,241],"class_list":["post-2126140","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-crawlmanager","tag-nytimes-com"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2126140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2126140"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2126140\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2126140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2126140"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2126140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}