{"id":208736,"date":"2014-03-29T16:06:55","date_gmt":"2014-03-29T13:06:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=208736"},"modified":"2014-03-29T16:06:55","modified_gmt":"2014-03-29T13:06:55","slug":"curtea-constitutionala-referendumul-nu-este-un-simplu-sondaj","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=208736","title":{"rendered":"Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103: Referendumul nu este un simplu sondaj"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry data-app-meta data-app-meta-article\" data-embed-base-url-canonical=\"https:\/\/www.digi24.ro\/embed\/stiri\/actualitate\/politica\/curtea-constitutionala-referendumul-nu-este-un-simplu-sondaj-221630\">\n<p data-index=\"1\">Proiectul de revizuire a Legii fundamentale a schimbat \u015fi reglement\u0103rile privind consult\u0103rile populare, \u00eens\u0103 nu suficient. Cei nou\u0103 judec\u0103tori ai Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale atrag aten\u0163ia asupra unei caren\u0163e pe care o consider\u0103 major\u0103.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"2\">Curtea constat\u0103 c\u0103 nici actuala Constitu\u0163ie \u015fi nici proiectul celei revizuite nu prev\u0103d sanc\u0163iuni \u00een cazul \u00een care autorit\u0103\u0163ile statului refuz\u0103 s\u0103 pun\u0103 \u00een aplicare rezultatele unui referendum consultativ. A\u015fa c\u0103 acesta ar fi redus, \u00een opinia judec\u0103torilor, la un simplu sondaj de opinie. <\/p>\n<p data-index=\"3\">CCR invoc\u0103 o recomandare similar\u0103 f\u0103cut\u0103 de Comisia de la Vene\u0163ia \u00eenc\u0103 din 2007. D\u0103 \u015fi un exemplu &#8211; referendumul din 2009, c\u00e2nd s-a votat cu o larg\u0103 majoritate pentru Parlamentul unicameral cu 300 de ale\u015fi.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"4\">\u201eVoin\u0163a politic\u0103 a poporului, manifestat\u0103 prin intermediul referendumului, a fost aceea a desfiin\u0163\u0103rii uneia dintre Camerele Parlamentului \u015fi a stabilirii unui num\u0103r maxim de parlamentari, determinat potrivit condi\u0163iilor legale, modific\u0103ri esen\u0163iale \u00een structura autorit\u0103\u0163ii legiuitoare, care impuneau modificarea Legii fundamentale. Voin\u021ba popular\u0103 exprimat\u0103 la acest scrutin a r\u0103mas f\u0103r\u0103 consecin\u021be juridice\u201d, precizeaz\u0103 Curtea \u00een avizul pentru proiectul de revizuire a Constitu\u0163iei.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"5\">\u201eCred c\u0103 o formulare transparent\u0103 \u015fi previzibil\u0103 a Constitu\u0163iei ar trebui s\u0103 cuprind\u0103 o referire la obliga\u0163ia Parlamentului de a lua \u00een considerare rezultatele acestui referendum m\u0103car \u015fi din perspectiva introducerii pe ordinea de zi a propunerii care a f\u0103cut obiectul unei consult\u0103ri populare\u201d, spune Ioan Stanomir, profesor de drept constitu\u0163ional.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"6\">Nu \u00een ultimul r\u00e2nd, Curtea recomand\u0103 ca pragul de validare a referendumului s\u0103 fie scos din proiectul de revizuire a Legii fundamentale sau cel pu\u0163in s\u0103 nu intre \u00een vigoare \u00eenainte de finalul anului. Aceasta, dup\u0103 ce \u00een noiembrie anul trecut, CCR a stabilit c\u0103 pragul poate fi modificat, \u00eens\u0103 nu \u00eenainte cu cel pu\u0163in un an de organizarea unui scrutin.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> Source URL: https:\/\/www.digi24.ro\/stiri\/actualitate\/politica\/curtea-constitutionala-referendumul-nu-este-un-simplu-sondaj-221630<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Proiectul de revizuire a Legii fundamentale a schimbat \u015fi reglement\u0103rile privind consult\u0103rile populare, \u00eens\u0103 nu suficient. Cei nou\u0103 judec\u0103tori ai Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale atrag aten\u0163ia asupra unei caren\u0163e pe care o consider\u0103 major\u0103. Curtea constat\u0103 c\u0103 nici actuala Constitu\u0163ie \u015fi nici proiectul celei revizuite nu prev\u0103d sanc\u0163iuni \u00een cazul \u00een care autorit\u0103\u0163ile statului refuz\u0103 s\u0103 pun\u0103 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":208737,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[11],"class_list":["post-208736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","tag-digi24"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=208736"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208736\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/208737"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=208736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=208736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=208736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}