{"id":2019042,"date":"2026-06-30T10:45:34","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T07:45:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=2019042"},"modified":"2026-06-30T10:45:34","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T07:45:34","slug":"kawhi-leonard-returning-to-raptors-is-more-than-a-fun-thought-it-makes-sense","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=2019042","title":{"rendered":"Kawhi Leonard returning to Raptors is more than a fun thought \u2014 it makes sense"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"Article_ContentContainer__jBNW3 article-content-container bodytext1\">\n<p>On paper, it makes no sense. Why would one of the youngest teams to make the playoffs last year move future assets to acquire an injury-prone, 35-year-old star \u2014 even if that player helped produce the greatest moment in franchise history? More than that, why would the team do that <em>and then<\/em> offer the player an expensive multi-year extension?<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad-container\">\n<div class=\"ad-wrapper article-treatment\">\n<div class=\"ad-slug-container\">\n<p class=\"ad-slug\">Advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mid1\" data-position=\"mid1\" class=\"ad place-ad\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>As ever, the devil is in the details. Those details are what make the idea of the Toronto Raptors reacquiring Kawhi Leonard rational.<\/p>\n<p>The Los Angeles Clippers and Raptors have been engaged on the Leonard front for days now, with Toronto seen as the frontrunner, per league sources who were granted anonymity so they could speak freely on the talks. While Dallas is known to have pursued Leonard, as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7404487\/2026\/06\/28\/kawhi-leonard-nba-trade-discussions-mavericks-clippers\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Athletic<\/em> first reported<\/a>, the Raptors are on Leonard\u2019s list of teams that he\u2019s willing to sign an extension with (along with the San Antonio Spurs) and have a significant edge as a result. Last week, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7395133\/2026\/06\/26\/raptors-kawhi-leonard-opportunistic-return-toronto\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Athletic<\/em> reported that the interest is mutual<\/a>. The Raptors are in a position to be interested in a lot of players.<\/p>\n<p>To understand why the Raptors are interested, we first must explore why the Clippers might move Leonard. With just one year and $50.3 million left on his contract, Leonard is obviously thinking about his next deal, as that is how the league works. The Clippers got much younger in February when they traded James Harden for Darius Garland.<\/p>\n<div data-ath-video-stream=\"bd3eqEs2svbaaWh\">\n<div class=\"VideoHost_Root__QeM_i\">\n<div class=\"VideoHost_VideoWidth__XjNKI VideoHost_Portrait__XBaJC\">\n<div class=\"VideoTitleFrame_Root__AGckL\">\n<div>\n<div class=\"VideoTitleFrame_Title__npf3B\">Why the Portland Trail Blazers traded for Ja Morant<\/div>\n<div class=\"VideoTitleFrame_Authors__jxyYV\">Esfandiar Baraheni and Jeshua Kidd<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"VideoTitleFrame_VideoWrapper__Xgp47\">{&#8220;@context&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/schema.org&#8221;,&#8221;@type&#8221;:&#8221;VideoObject&#8221;,&#8221;@id&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/video\/bd3eqEs2svbaaWh\/&#8221;,&#8221;url&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/video\/bd3eqEs2svbaaWh\/&#8221;,&#8221;name&#8221;:&#8221;Why the Portland Trail Blazers traded for Ja Morant&#8221;,&#8221;description&#8221;:&#8221;The Portland Trail Blazers just landed Ja Morant in a big trade. Es Baraheni breaks down what that means for the team. &#8220;,&#8221;uploadDate&#8221;:&#8221;2026-06-29T22:37:38.914Z&#8221;,&#8221;duration&#8221;:&#8221;PT1M14S&#8221;,&#8221;thumbnailUrl&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/cdn-media.theathletic.com\/video-stream\/auto-thumbnail\/bd3eqEs2svbaaWh\/hKGXFlTaUL0M.0000000.jpg&#8221;,&#8221;contentUrl&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/video.nyt.com\/athletic\/streams\/bd3eqEs2svbaaWh\/hKGXFlTaUL0M\/hKGXFlTaUL0M.m3u8&#8243;,&#8221;transcript&#8221;:&#8221;The Portland Trail Blazers have traded for John Morant. The John Morant saga in Memphis is finally over. There&#8217;s 4 questions that immediately pop out in my mind. The first thing is, how do he and Damian Lillard work together? Not to mention the Blazers have a stacked backcourt situation between Damian Lillard, Drew Holiday, and Scoop Henderson. What does this acquisition mean for All of them. How much do the Portland Trail Blazers believe that John Morant can get back to that All-Star level that he was? John Morant is undoubtedly one of the best passers in the NBA, and he used to be one of the best drivers in all of basketball. If you were to ever get back to that level, the combination of him and Danny Adia would make the Trail Blazers one of the best driving teams in all of the NBA. And the third question I have is, what does this all mean for Scoot Henderson? What does this mean for his future as a Portland Trail Blazer with some contract decisions coming up? But overall, this is a good swing for the Portland Trail Blazers who were able to get off of Jeremy Grant&#8217;s contract, all while adding a very intriguing piece in Morant that maybe if it all works out, can work out very well for Portland.&#8221;,&#8221;ineligibleRegion&#8221;:[&#8220;BI&#8221;,&#8221;BY&#8221;,&#8221;CD&#8221;,&#8221;CF&#8221;,&#8221;CU&#8221;,&#8221;IQ&#8221;,&#8221;IR&#8221;,&#8221;KP&#8221;,&#8221;LB&#8221;,&#8221;LY&#8221;,&#8221;ML&#8221;,&#8221;NI&#8221;,&#8221;RU&#8221;,&#8221;SD&#8221;,&#8221;SO&#8221;,&#8221;SS&#8221;,&#8221;SY&#8221;,&#8221;UA&#8221;,&#8221;VE&#8221;,&#8221;YE&#8221;,&#8221;ZW&#8221;],&#8221;publisher&#8221;:{&#8220;@type&#8221;:&#8221;NewsMediaOrganization&#8221;,&#8221;@id&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/#publisher&#8221;,&#8221;name&#8221;:&#8221;The Athletic&#8221;,&#8221;url&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/&#8221;,&#8221;foundingDate&#8221;:&#8221;2016-01-25&#8243;,&#8221;logo&#8221;:{&#8220;@type&#8221;:&#8221;ImageObject&#8221;,&#8221;@id&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/theathletic.com\/app\/themes\/athletic\/assets\/img\/the-athletic-wordmark-black.png&#8221;,&#8221;url&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/theathletic.com\/app\/themes\/athletic\/assets\/img\/the-athletic-wordmark-black.png&#8221;,&#8221;contentUrl&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/theathletic.com\/app\/themes\/athletic\/assets\/img\/the-athletic-wordmark-black.png&#8221;,&#8221;creditText&#8221;:&#8221;The Athletic&#8221;,&#8221;height&#8221;:&#8221;60&#8243;,&#8221;width&#8221;:&#8221;435&#8243;},&#8221;publishingPrinciples&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/edit-guidelines\/&#8221;,&#8221;sameAs&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Athletic&#8221;},&#8221;author&#8221;:[{&#8220;@type&#8221;:&#8221;Person&#8221;,&#8221;name&#8221;:&#8221;Esfandiar Baraheni and Jeshua Kidd&#8221;}]}<\/p>\n<div class=\"AspectRatioBox_root__AKv5b\" style=\"aspect-ratio:9 \/ 16;max-height:min(100%)\">\n<div class=\"AspectRatioBox_inner__86C_2\" style=\"aspect-ratio:9 \/ 16\">\n<div class=\"VideoStreamPlayer_GridStack__2H0p2\"><video preload=\"none\"><\/video><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>It would be an understatement to say the Clippers and Leonard have gone through a lot of drama since he signed with the franchise in July 2019, leaving Toronto. Because of various injuries and related maintenance, Leonard has played in just 364 of the Clippers\u2019 604 regular-season and playoff games since he joined the team. He missed the entire 2021-22 season and failed to make it through the playoffs healthy in three of his five times getting that far with Los Angeles.<\/p>\n<p>There is also <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7095329\/2026\/03\/06\/nba-clippers-kawhi-leonard-aspiration-investigation-whistleblower\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Aspiration scandal<\/a>. Clippers executive Lawrence Frank said earlier in the offseason that his goal was to win with Leonard. But after moving Harden to the Cleveland Cavaliers and Ivica Zubac to the Indiana Pacers in a trade that got them the fifth pick in this month\u2019s draft, used on Keaton Wagler, it is reasonable for the Clippers to move in a younger direction.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad-container\">\n<div class=\"ad-wrapper article-treatment\">\n<div class=\"ad-slug-container\">\n<p class=\"ad-slug\">Advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mid2\" data-position=\"mid2\" class=\"ad place-ad\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Then why should the Raptors, whose two most important players for the long-term will be 25 (Scottie Barnes) and 21 (Collin Murray-Boyles) when the season starts, be interested if the Clippers are waffling? Well, the Raptors\u2019 cap picture isn\u2019t exactly rosy. Brandon Ingram (two years, $81.9 million, including a player option for 2027-28), Immanuel Quickley (three years, $97.5 million and Jakob Poeltl (four years, $103.6 million, with just a $5 million guarantee for 2029-30) are on contracts ranging from neutral value to cap-sheet albatrosses. They have picks and prospects to dangle in a trade, but not team-friendly contracts for veterans. Those contracts are either going to make it impossible to enter bidding wars for more in-demand players or require them to surrender more draft capital than their competitors to make competitive offers.<\/p>\n<div id=\"top-league-content-root\"><\/div>\n<p>    {&#8220;endpoint&#8221;:&#8221;https:\/\/api-prd-nyt.theathletic.com\/graphql&#8221;}<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s say the Clippers are determined not to extend Leonard. They have two options: 1) Keep him for 2026-27, allow his contract to expire and see if they want to attempt to retain him in the summer in unrestricted free agency; or 2) trade him now, and get whatever they can in return now to help build around Garland and Wagler.<\/p>\n<p id=\"article-pickem\">\n<p>This is where the Raptors come in. A team with whom Leonard has signalled a willingness to sign an extension would have more incentive to trade future pieces for him than a team without that assurance. At the same time, Leonard limiting his list of teams would theoretically cool the market and lower the offers.<\/p>\n<p>Ironically, the Raptors acquired Leonard from San Antonio in 2018 despite not having the same assurance. There is always the risk that a team without an extension in place for Leonard could make a better offer than the Raptors, seeing as the same situation played out eight years ago in Toronto\u2019s favour. Then again, Leonard is nearing the end of his career now, as opposed to in the middle of what seemed like his prime.<\/p>\n<p>If the competition is relatively modest for Leonard, the Raptors could offer a package like Ingram, Gradey Dick, a 2027 first-round pick and perhaps another draft asset for Leonard. Ingram is six years younger than Leonard, but it is not as if he is a much better bet to stay healthy. While Leonard has played 60.2 percent of games over the last seven years, Ingram has played in 69.5 percent of his. Both are coming off healthy seasons, with Ingram playing in 82 of 89 possible games and Leonard playing in 65 of 82.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad-container\">\n<div class=\"ad-wrapper article-treatment\">\n<div class=\"ad-slug-container\">\n<p class=\"ad-slug\">Advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"mid3\" data-position=\"mid3\" class=\"ad place-ad\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>However, there is no comparison between the two when they are healthy. Leonard averaged 27.9 points per game on 50.5\/38.7\/89.2 percent shooting (from the field, 3-point arc and free-throw line, respectively) last year, posting 9.2 win shares and a 27.9 player efficiency rating. Ingram averaged 21.5 points on 47.7\/38.2\/82 shooting, posting a 4.6 win shares and a 16.2 PER. The Clippers were 13.8 points per 100 possessions better with Leonard on the floor than off it in the regular season, while the Raptors were 4.9 points per 100 possessions better with Ingram off the court. Even diminished from his peak, Leonard is a better defender than Ingram and a much more credentialed playoff performer.<\/p>\n<p>If the Raptors can get Leonard at a reasonable acquisition cost and keep the extension to two years after this one, it is worth trading in a smidgeon of availability for far more per-minute production. It would give the Raptors a higher ceiling for the rest of Barnes\u2019 contract, which runs through 2029-30, without sacrificing so much of the future that they a) would be without building blocks if the second Leonard experience in Toronto is not as fruitful as the first; b) couldn\u2019t make other moves on top of this one.<\/p>\n<p>Ideally, any core-altering move would be more in line with Barnes\u2019 timeline. However, the Raptors\u2019 books do not make for an ideal world. This is silly season, so many of the reports might be just a leverage play on Leonard\u2019s part to get an extension offer he likes from the Clippers. More suitors might emerge. It is also possible that if the Raptors don\u2019t push in enough chips, the Clippers decide they\u2019d rather just wipe Leonard\u2019s contract off the books and let him leave in free agency than agree to take on more future money.<\/p>\n<p>Still, from the Raptors\u2019 perspective, there is something logical about the idea. At the very least, it\u2019s something fun to think about, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=zIwh0njInPk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Leonard would never deprive Raptors fans of fun<\/a>, would he?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On paper, it makes no sense. Why would one of the youngest teams to make the playoffs last year move future assets to acquire an injury-prone, 35-year-old star \u2014 even if that player helped produce the greatest moment in franchise history? More than that, why would the team do that and then offer the player [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[226,241],"class_list":["post-2019042","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-crawlmanager","tag-nytimes-com"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2019042","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2019042"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2019042\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2019042"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2019042"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2019042"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}