{"id":1981102,"date":"2026-06-09T21:24:05","date_gmt":"2026-06-09T18:24:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1981102"},"modified":"2026-06-09T21:24:05","modified_gmt":"2026-06-09T18:24:05","slug":"mitski-covers-one-direction-for-the-tenth-anniversary-of-puberty-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1981102","title":{"rendered":"Mitski Covers One Direction For The Tenth Anniversary Of \u2018Puberty 2\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

Lexie Alley<\/span><\/div>\n

\n
\n

Music<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Mitski Covers One Direction For The Tenth Anniversary Of \u2018Puberty 2\u2019<\/h1>\n
\n

She\u2019s got a feeling deep inside.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
by Jillian Giandurco<\/a><\/address>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Remember when we were all convinced it was 2016 again? We might not\u2019ve been so far off base after all. Today, Mitski<\/a> released a tenth anniversary deluxe edition of Puberty 2<\/em><\/a> <\/em>complete with two new song covers \u2014 one of which is very mid-2010s-coded.<\/p>\n

At 13 tracks long, the project features all your favorites from the original 2016 album and two bonus tracks: a cover of Frank Sinatra\u2019s \u201cI\u2019m A Fool To Want You\u201d and a cover of One Direction\u2019s \u201cFireproof.\u201d Both are certainly a departure from the original source material, while also being quintessentially Mitski; clocking in at just under two minutes long, \u201cFireproof\u201d sees Mitski putting a rockist spin on the Fleetwood Mac-esque love song, with her wailing vocals soaring over the punchy guitars with such a force that Harry<\/a> and co. could never recreate. The former, on the other hand, is giving Sinatra-but-make-it-shoegaze.<\/p>\n

The covers are exclusive to the digital version of the album (available to stream now<\/a>), with the limited edition 10th anniversary vinyl dropping on Oct. 30.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/i><\/a><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Whether or not it\u2019s 2016 again still remains to be seen, though we can\u2019t deny that this is pretty solid evidence in favor of the 2016-issance.<\/p>\n