[analyse_image type=”featured” src=”https:\/\/s.iw.ro\/gateway\/g\/ZmlsZVNvdXJjZT1odHRwJTNBJTJGJTJG\/c3RvcmFnZTA4dHJhbnNjb2Rlci5yY3Mt\/cmRzLnJvJTJGc3RvcmFnZSUyRjIwMjYl\/MkYwMiUyRjEwJTJGMjU4NDQwM18yNTg0\/NDAzX3Byb2ZpbWVkaWEtMTA3MjI0NTY0\/My5qcGcmdz0xMjAwJmg9NjMwJnpjPTEm\/aGFzaD0xYzk0M2NmNjdlNDE3NGExZjhiOTNiZjViOTUzOWVmOQ==.thumb.jpg”]<\/p>\n
Melania Trump<\/a> a ob\u021binut respingerea unei ac\u021biuni \u00een justi\u021bie intentate de autorul Michael Wolff, menit\u0103 s\u0103 previn\u0103 o ac\u021biune \u00een def\u0103imare \u00een valoare de un miliard de dolari intentat\u0103 de prima doamn\u0103 a Americii cu privire la declara\u021biile f\u0103cute de acesta \u00een mass-media. Judec\u0103toarea districtual\u0103 american\u0103 Mary Kay Vyskocil a declarat c\u0103 cererea lui Wolff \u00eempotriva lui Trump \u00een temeiul legilor anti-SLAPP, menite s\u0103 permit\u0103 p\u00e2r\u00e2\u021bilor s\u0103 resping\u0103 rapid procesele f\u0103r\u0103 temei \u0219i intimidante, era \u201epreventiv\u0103\u201d \u0219i prezentat\u0103 \u00eentr-o \u201epozi\u021bie oarecum distorsionat\u0103\u201d, anun\u021b\u0103 The Guardian<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00centr-o hot\u0103r\u00e2re de 45 de pagini, Vyskocil a afirmat c\u0103 \u201ereclamantul solicit\u0103 o declara\u021bie conform c\u0103reia, \u00een cazul \u00een care prima doamn\u0103 \u00eel d\u0103 \u00een judecat\u0103, el merit\u0103 s\u0103 c\u00e2\u0219tige. Nu a\u0219a func\u021bioneaz\u0103 instan\u021bele federale\u201d.<\/p>\n Wolff, care a scris patru c\u0103r\u021bi despre Donald Trump, a intentat procesul anul trecut ca r\u0103spuns la un proces intentat de prima doamn\u0103 dup\u0103 ce aceasta a cerut – \u0219i nu a primit – scuze pentru comentariile lui Wolff privind modul \u00een care administra\u021bia a gestionat dosarele legate de defunctul traficant sexual Jeffrey Epstein.<\/p>\n Vyskocil, numit de Trump, a recunoscut c\u0103 Wolff \u0219i prima doamn\u0103 \u201eau o disput\u0103 real\u0103\u201d, dar a afirmat c\u0103 \u201etrebuie s\u0103 o solu\u021bioneze pe cale judiciar\u0103, urm\u00e2nd acelea\u0219i proceduri ca toat\u0103 lumea\u201d.<\/p>\n Wolff a dat-o \u00een judecat\u0103 pe Melania Trump \u00een octombrie anul trecut, dup\u0103 ce avocatul acesteia, Alejandro Brito, i-a spus \u00eentr-o scrisoare c\u0103 ea \u201enu va avea alt\u0103 alternativ\u0103\u201d dec\u00e2t s\u0103-l dea \u00een judecat\u0103 dac\u0103 el nu \u00ee\u0219i retrage declara\u021biile care, potrivit avocatului, i-au cauzat \u201eun prejudiciu cople\u0219itor \u00een ceea ce prive\u0219te reputa\u021bia \u0219i situa\u021bia financiar\u0103\u201d.<\/p>\n Vyskocil a hot\u0103r\u00e2t c\u0103 Wolff \u00eencerca s\u0103 ob\u021bin\u0103 un tratament special prin intentarea unui proces \u00een afara ordinii normale \u0219i l-a acuzat de \u201ec\u0103utarea unui for favorabil \u00een mod abuziv\u201d, depun\u00e2nd pl\u00e2ngerea la New York \u00eenainte ca Trump s\u0103 fi intentat procesul de calomnie \u00een Florida.<\/p>\n \u00cen cadrul acestui demers juridic menit s\u0103 demonstreze c\u0103 declara\u021biile sale nu erau def\u0103im\u0103toare, Wolff a c\u00e2\u0219tigat \u201ecursa c\u0103tre tribunal\u201d, a scris Vyskocil, dar a afirmat c\u0103 acesta a dat dovad\u0103 de un \u201enivel inadecvat de jocuri tactice\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201eConcluzia este simpl\u0103\u201d, a continuat Vyskocil. \u201eInstan\u021ba nu va fi obligat\u0103 s\u0103 supravegheze o disput\u0103 prezentat\u0103 \u00een mod abuziv \u0219i, prin urmare, refuz\u0103 s\u0103 se pronun\u021be asupra fondului cauzei.\u201d<\/p>\n Cite\u0219te \u0219i:<\/strong><\/p>\n Melania Trump tocmai s-a aliat cu du\u0219manii declara\u021bi ai so\u021bului ei \u00een dosarul Epstein. R\u0103m\u00e2ne de v\u0103zut de partea cui va fi Congresul<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n Wolff, despre care dosarele Departamentului de Justi\u021bie au dezv\u0103luit c\u0103 a avut o comunicare intens\u0103 cu Epstein pe tema primei candidaturi preziden\u021biale a lui Donald Trump, a intentat ini\u021bial un proces la tribunalul statului New York, dar avoca\u021bii p\u00e2r\u00e2tului au ob\u021binut transferul cazului la tribunalul federal \u0219i au \u00eencercat ulterior s\u0103 ob\u021bin\u0103 respingerea acestuia sau transferul la un tribunal federal din Florida.<\/p>\n Vyskocil a declarat c\u0103, de\u0219i instan\u021ba federal\u0103 are competen\u021b\u0103, ea refuz\u0103 s\u0103 o exercite \u0219i \u201erespinge acest caz pentru a fi judecat ca oricare altul\u201d.<\/p>\n Nick Clemens, purt\u0103torul de cuv\u00e2nt al Melaniei Trump, a declarat c\u0103 prima doamn\u0103 \u201eeste m\u00e2ndr\u0103 s\u0103 continue s\u0103 se opun\u0103 \u0219i s\u0103 lupte \u00eempotriva celor care r\u0103sp\u00e2ndesc minciuni r\u0103uvoitoare \u0219i def\u0103im\u0103toare, \u00een \u00eencercarea lor disperat\u0103 de a ob\u021bine aten\u021bie nemeritat\u0103 \u0219i bani din comportamentul lor ilegal\u201d.<\/p>\n Decizia vine dup\u0103 ce Melania Trump a f\u0103cut o declara\u021bie la Casa Alb\u0103 \u00een care a negat orice leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu Epstein \u0219i a afirmat c\u0103 ea \u0219i avoca\u021bii ei vor riposta \u00eempotriva \u201eminciunilor nefondate \u0219i f\u0103r\u0103 temei\u201d potrivit c\u0103rora ar avea leg\u0103turi cu acesta.<\/p>\n \u201eMinciunile care m\u0103 leag\u0103 de ru\u0219inosul Jeffrey Epstein trebuie s\u0103 \u00eenceteze ast\u0103zi\u201d, a spus prima doamn\u0103. \u201ePersoanele care mint despre mine sunt lipsite de standarde etice, umilin\u021b\u0103 \u0219i respect. Nu m\u0103 deranjeaz\u0103 ignoran\u021ba lor, ci resping \u00eencerc\u0103rile lor r\u0103ut\u0103cioase de a-mi def\u0103ima reputa\u021bia.\u201d<\/p>\n Ea a ad\u0103ugat: \u201eNu am fost niciodat\u0103 prieten\u0103 cu Epstein. Donald \u0219i cu mine eram invita\u021bi din c\u00e2nd \u00een c\u00e2nd la acelea\u0219i petreceri ca \u0219i Epstein, deoarece suprapunerea cercurilor sociale este ceva obi\u0219nuit \u00een New York City \u0219i Palm Beach.\u201d<\/p>\n Cite\u0219te \u0219i:<\/strong><\/p>\n