{"id":1930469,"date":"2026-05-07T20:00:41","date_gmt":"2026-05-07T17:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1930469"},"modified":"2026-05-07T20:00:41","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T17:00:41","slug":"the-golden-globes-ai-rules-are-way-less-strict-than-the-oscars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1930469","title":{"rendered":"The Golden Globes\u2019 AI Rules Are Way Less Strict Than the Oscars\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

[analyse_image type=”featured” src=”https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/app\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Rhea_Seehorn_Golden_Globe-1200×675.jpg”]<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Late last week, the Oscars announced new eligibility rules with an eye toward the rise of AI. Acting roles must be \u201cdemonstrably performed by humans with their consent,\u201d while screenplays \u201cmust be human-authored.\u201d (You can read the full list of rules here.) Today, the Golden Globes countered with its own adjusted rules, and the boundaries are\u2026 somewhat blurrier.<\/p>\n

The Golden Globes cover a wider swath of media than just movies, including TV shows, made-for-TV movies, and podcasts. Moving forward, \u201cthe use of artificial intelligence (AI), including generative AI, does not automatically disqualify a work from consideration, provided that human creative direction, artistic judgment, and authorship remain primary throughout the production process,\u201d according to the Globes\u2019 new guidelines (read the full list here).<\/p>\n

\u201cAll submitted work will be evaluated based on the extent to which creative direction, artistic decision-making, and execution originate from credited individuals,\u201d it continues. \u201cAI and similar technologies may be used as part of the production process \u2026 but may not replace the core creative contributions of human talent. All submissions must include a disclosure describing any generative AI used anywhere in the production of the completed work, including if any AI alteration was made to a credited performer\u2019s likeness or voice.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, that doesn\u2019t mean your Tilly Norwoods have a green light to start taking over. \u201cPerformances submitted for acting categories must be primarily derived from the work of the credited performer. Submissions in which a performance is substantially generated or created by artificial intelligence are not eligible,\u201d the Globes caution.<\/p>\n

The use of AI \u201cfor technical or cosmetic enhancements\u201d\u2014like those freaky de-aging special effects flashbacks are so fond of using\u2014\u201dmay be permissible, provided the underlying performance remains that of the credited individual and AI does not replace or materially alter the performer\u2019s work.\u201d<\/p>\n

AI tools can only be used \u201cto enhance or support a performance that remains fundamentally human-driven and under the creative control of the credited performer, and that any such use is authorized by the performer.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Globes are careful to note that the awards will not<\/em> consider \u201cperformances generated through the unauthorized use of a performer\u2019s digital likeness, voice replication, or biometric data, whether or not the performer is otherwise credited.\u201d<\/p>\n

There\u2019s similar language applied to the non-acting categories, where work \u201cremains eligible provided that the core creative contributions in the relevant craft (including but not limited to direction, writing, composition, and animation) originate primarily from credited human individuals, and that any use of AI or generative tools serves a supporting or enhancing role rather than substituting for that human creative authorship. All disclosure requirements apply consistently to submissions in these categories.\u201d<\/p>\n

In short: your Golden Globes submissions can<\/em> use AI if you use it as an enhancement but not as a replacement, and you have to disclose when it\u2019s been used. Still, it feels like opening the door even a crack has the potential to be problematic; as has already become extremely clear, once AI slop worms its way into any form of media, it\u2019s incredibly difficult to shovel it back out again. Here\u2019s hoping Hollywood recognizes the responsibility that comes with this wiggle room\u2014and that the Golden Globes can find a realistic and ethical way to enforce its new guidelines.<\/p>\n

\n

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what\u2019s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n

\n

Late last week, the Oscars announced new eligibility rules with an eye toward the rise of AI. Acting roles must be \u201cdemonstrably performed by humans with their consent,\u201d while screenplays \u201cmust be human-authored.\u201d (You can read the full list of rules here.) Today, the Golden Globes countered with its own adjusted rules, and the boundaries are\u2026 somewhat blurrier.<\/p>\n

The Golden Globes cover a wider swath of media than just movies, including TV shows, made-for-TV movies, and podcasts. Moving forward, \u201cthe use of artificial intelligence (AI), including generative AI, does not automatically disqualify a work from consideration, provided that human creative direction, artistic judgment, and authorship remain primary throughout the production process,\u201d according to the Globes\u2019 new guidelines (read the full list here).<\/p>\n

\u201cAll submitted work will be evaluated based on the extent to which creative direction, artistic decision-making, and execution originate from credited individuals,\u201d it continues. \u201cAI and similar technologies may be used as part of the production process \u2026 but may not replace the core creative contributions of human talent. All submissions must include a disclosure describing any generative AI used anywhere in the production of the completed work, including if any AI alteration was made to a credited performer\u2019s likeness or voice.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, that doesn\u2019t mean your Tilly Norwoods have a green light to start taking over. \u201cPerformances submitted for acting categories must be primarily derived from the work of the credited performer. Submissions in which a performance is substantially generated or created by artificial intelligence are not eligible,\u201d the Globes caution.<\/p>\n

The use of AI \u201cfor technical or cosmetic enhancements\u201d\u2014like those freaky de-aging special effects flashbacks are so fond of using\u2014\u201dmay be permissible, provided the underlying performance remains that of the credited individual and AI does not replace or materially alter the performer\u2019s work.\u201d<\/p>\n

AI tools can only be used \u201cto enhance or support a performance that remains fundamentally human-driven and under the creative control of the credited performer, and that any such use is authorized by the performer.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Globes are careful to note that the awards will not<\/em> consider \u201cperformances generated through the unauthorized use of a performer\u2019s digital likeness, voice replication, or biometric data, whether or not the performer is otherwise credited.\u201d<\/p>\n

There\u2019s similar language applied to the non-acting categories, where work \u201cremains eligible provided that the core creative contributions in the relevant craft (including but not limited to direction, writing, composition, and animation) originate primarily from credited human individuals, and that any use of AI or generative tools serves a supporting or enhancing role rather than substituting for that human creative authorship. All disclosure requirements apply consistently to submissions in these categories.\u201d<\/p>\n

In short: your Golden Globes submissions can<\/em> use AI if you use it as an enhancement but not as a replacement, and you have to disclose when it\u2019s been used. Still, it feels like opening the door even a crack has the potential to be problematic; as has already become extremely clear, once AI slop worms its way into any form of media, it\u2019s incredibly difficult to shovel it back out again. Here\u2019s hoping Hollywood recognizes the responsibility that comes with this wiggle room\u2014and that the Golden Globes can find a realistic and ethical way to enforce its new guidelines.<\/p>\n

\n

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what\u2019s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

[analyse_source url=”https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/golden-globes-ai-rules-2000755850″]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[analyse_image type=”featured” src=”https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/app\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Rhea_Seehorn_Golden_Globe-1200×675.jpg”] Late last week, the Oscars announced new eligibility rules with an eye toward the rise of AI. Acting roles must be \u201cdemonstrably performed by humans with their consent,\u201d while screenplays \u201cmust be human-authored.\u201d (You can read the full list of rules here.) Today, the Golden Globes countered with its own adjusted rules, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[226,53],"class_list":["post-1930469","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","tag-crawlmanager","tag-gizmodo-com"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1930469","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1930469"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1930469\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1930469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1930469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1930469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}