{"id":1920888,"date":"2026-05-06T06:10:56","date_gmt":"2026-05-06T03:10:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1920888"},"modified":"2026-05-06T06:10:56","modified_gmt":"2026-05-06T03:10:56","slug":"judecatoare-acuzata-de-incompatibilitate-avocatul-cristian-winzer-i-a-facut-plangere-disciplinara-pentru-incompatibilitate-neabtinere-lipsa-motivarii-si-grava-neglijenta-judecatoarei-camel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1920888","title":{"rendered":"JUDEC\u0102TOARE ACUZAT\u0102 DE INCOMPATIBILITATE \u2013 Avocatul Cristian Winzer i-a f\u0103cut pl\u00e2ngere disciplinar\u0103 pentru incompatibilitate, neab\u021binere, lipsa motiv\u0103rii \u0219i grav\u0103 neglijen\u021b\u0103 judec\u0103toarei Camelia Grecu de la Tribunalul Cluj din cazul \u0219efului ARR Cristian Anton"},"content":{"rendered":"

[analyse_image type=”featured” src=”https:\/\/ziardesuceava.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Camelia_Dorina_Grecu.png”]<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n
\n

Evolu\u021bie nea\u0219teptat\u0103 \u00een dosarul \u00een care\u00a0procuroarea Alina-Andreea Berchi\u0219an de la DNA Cluj<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0l-a re\u021binut pe\u00a0inginerul Cristian Anton \u00a0\u2013 directorul Autorit\u0103\u021bii Rutiere Rom\u00e2ne (ARR), pentru luare de mit\u0103 \u0219i grup infrac\u021bional organizat, potrivi luju.ro<\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Avocatul Cristian Winzer\u00a0(foto 2)\u00a0\u2013 ap\u0103r\u0103torul lui Anton<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u2013 i-a f\u0103cut joi, 30 aprilie 2026, pl\u00e2ngere disciplinar\u0103\u00a0judec\u0103toarei Camelia<\/strong><\/b>-Dorina Grecu\u00a0(foto 1)\u00a0de la Tribunalul Cluj<\/strong><\/b>, cea care a dispus arestarea preventiv\u0103 a \u0219efului ARR.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Winzer o acuz\u0103 pe Grecu de urm\u0103toarele abateri prev\u0103zute de\u00a0art. 271 din Legea nr. 303\/2022 privind statutul judec\u0103torilor \u0219i procurorilor<\/strong><\/b>:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013 a) teza I:\u00a0\u201e\u00eenc\u0103lcarea prevederilor legale referitoare la incompatibilit\u0103\u0163i\u201d<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>;<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013 h) teza I:\u00a0\u201enerespectarea \u00eendatoririi de a se ab\u0163ine atunci c\u00e2nd judec\u0103torul \u015ftie c\u0103 exist\u0103 una din cauzele prev\u0103zute de lege pentru ab\u0163inerea sa\u201d<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>;<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013 r) teza a II-a:\u00a0\u201elipsa total\u0103 a motiv\u0103rii (\u2026), de natur\u0103 s\u0103 afecteze prestigiul justi\u0163iei sau demnitatea func\u0163iei de judec\u0103tor\u201d<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>;<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2013 s) teza a II-a:\u00a0\u201eexercitarea func\u0163iei cu grav\u0103 neglijen\u0163\u0103\u201d<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Judec\u0103toarea, acuzat\u0103 de antepronun\u021bare \u0219i de copy-paste dup\u0103 DNA<\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Concret, \u00een sesizarea pe care Lumea Justi\u021biei o prezint\u0103 integral,\u00a0avocatul sus\u021bine c\u0103 judec\u0103toarea ar fi trebuit s\u0103 se ab\u021bin\u0103 de la judecarea cererii DNA privind arestarea preventiv\u0103 a lui Cristian Anton, din moment ce tot ea solu\u021bionase solicit\u0103rile parchetului anticorup\u021bie privind perchezi\u021biile, intercept\u0103rile \u0219i ob\u021binerea de date privind tranzac\u021biile financiare ale aceluia\u0219i inculpat. \u0218i nu doar c\u0103 le solu\u021bionase, dar folosise un ton inchizitorial \u00een \u00eencheieri, ca \u0219i c\u00e2nd vinov\u0103\u021bia lui Anton a fost deja stabilit\u0103, adaug\u0103 Cristian Winzer.<\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Proced\u00e2nd astfel,\u00a0magistrata i-a \u00eenc\u0103lcat inculpatului dreptul la un proces echitabil, mai reclam\u0103 avocatul \u00een pl\u00e2ngerea trimis\u0103 Inspec\u021biei Judiciare<\/strong><\/b>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nu \u00een ultimul r\u00e2nd,\u00a0ap\u0103r\u0103torul \u0219efului ARR arat\u0103 c\u0103 judec\u0103toarea a preluat cu copy-paste pasaje din cererile DNA \u2013 inclusiv gre\u0219elile de scriere ale parchetului<\/strong><\/b>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Prezent\u0103m principalul pasaj din sesizarea disciplinar\u0103:<\/strong><\/b><\/span>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201e<\/em><\/i>Aspecte preliminare:<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

1.1.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00cen fapt, ar\u0103t c\u0103\u00a0am calitatea\u00a0<\/strong><\/b><\/em><\/i>de INCULPAT \u00een cauza care face obiectul Dosarului 4697\/159\/P\/2024, aflat \u00een instrumentarea P.\u00ce.C.C.J. \u2013 Direc\u021bia Na\u021bional\u0103 Anticorup\u021bie \u2013 Serviciul Teritorial Cluj<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>, privind s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219irea infrac\u021biunilor de\u00a0(i)\u00a0luare de mit\u0103 \u00een form\u0103 continuat\u0103\u00a0(prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 289 alin. (1) C.Pen., cu aplicarea art. 6 din Legea nr. 78\/2000, cu aplicarea art. 35 alin. (1) C.Pen.), (ii)\u00a0folosirea, \u00een orice mod, direct sau indirect, de informa\u021bii care nu sunt destinate publicit\u0103\u021bii ori permiterea accesului unor persoane neautorizate la aceste informa\u021bii, \u00een scopul ob\u021binerii de foloase necuvenite\u00a0(prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 12 lit. b) din Legea nr. 78\/2000),\u00a0respectiv\u00a0(iii)\u00a0constituirea unui grup infrac\u021bional organizat\u00a0(prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 367 alin. (1) C.Pen.). \u2013 a se vedea Procesul-verbal de aducere la cuno\u0219tin\u021b\u0103 a calit\u0103\u021bii de inculpat \u0219i de comunicare a drepturilor \u0219i obliga\u021biilor procesuale ale inculpatului nr. 4697\/159\/P\/2024 din data de 31 martie 2026.\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

1.2.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Prin\u00a0Referatul nr. 4697\/159\/P\/2024 din data de 01 aprilie 2026,\u00a0<\/strong><\/b><\/em><\/i>P.\u00ce.C.C.J. \u2013 Direc\u021bia Na\u021bional\u0103 Anticorup\u021bie \u2013 Serviciul Teritorial Cluj a solicitat arestarea preventiv\u0103\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>(pentru o perioad\u0103 de 30 de zile, \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu data de 01 aprilie 2026 \u0219i p\u00e2n\u0103 la data de 30 aprilie 2026)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0a subsemnatului pentru s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219irea infrac\u021biunilor men\u021bionate\u00a0supra\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>(a se vedea ANEXA nr. 2), iar prin\u00a0\u00cencheierea penal\u0103 nr. 953\/C\/2026, pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een \u0219edin\u021ba camerei de consiliu din data de 01 aprilie 2026\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>(\u00een solu\u021bionarea cauzei care a f\u0103cut obiectul Dosarului nr. 1646\/117\/2026),\u00a0doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a admis cererea Ministerului Public, dispun\u00e2nd arestarea preventiv\u0103 a subsemnatului\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>(\u0219i deopotriv\u0103 a celuilalt inculpat din cauz\u0103, \u00een persoana numitului RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru).\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Aspecte viz\u00e2nd abaterile disciplinare s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219ite de doamna judec\u0103tor GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    1.3.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00cen primul r\u00e2nd<\/em><\/i>, este important de observat c\u0103 d<\/em><\/i>osarul av\u00e2nd ca obiect propunerea P.\u00ce.C.C.J. \u2013 D.N.A. \u2013 Serviciul Teritorial Cluj de arestare preventiv\u0103 a subsemnatului a fost solu\u021bionat \u00een fond la nivelul Tribunalului Cluj de doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, respectiv acela\u0219i judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi care analizase \u0219i care admisese, ANTERIOR, TOATE cererile D.N.A \u2013 Serviciul Teritorial Cluj de \u00eencuviin\u021bare \u0219i de prelungire a m\u0103surilor de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103), TOATE cererile D.N.A. \u2013 Serviciul Teritorial Cluj de ob\u021binere a datelor privind tranzac\u021biile financiare ale subsemnatului \u0219i ale membrilor familiei\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele prin care a fost autorizat\u0103 ob\u021binerea datelor privind aceste tranzac\u021bii financiare), respectiv TOATE cererile aceleia\u0219i structuri specializate a Ministerului Public de \u00eencuviin\u021bare a efectu\u0103rii perchezi\u021biilor domiciliare\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de perchezi\u021bie domiciliar\u0103).<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.4.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Legal, pentru a \u00eencuviin\u021ba aceste cereri, judec\u0103torul \u00een cauz\u0103 a fost obligat s\u0103 analizeze \u0219i s\u0103 confirme DAC\u0102 exist\u0103 o suspiciune rezonabil\u0103 cu privire la s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219irea de c\u0103tre subsemnatul a unor infrac\u021biuni\u00a0(prin suspiciuni rezonabile \u00een\u021beleg\u00e2ndu-se existen\u021ba unor date \u0219i informa\u021bii rezultate din probele administrate \u00eentr-o cauz\u0103, apte s\u0103 conving\u0103 un observator obiectiv \u0219i impar\u021bial c\u0103 este posibil ca o persoan\u0103 s\u0103 fi s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219it o infrac\u021biune).\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.5.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Or, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 pentru a decide asupra libert\u0103\u021bii sau a deten\u021biei subsemnatului, judec\u0103torul de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi era chemat s\u0103 reanalizeze\u00a0(\u00een sensul dispozi\u021biilor art. 139 alin. (1) lit. a) C.Proc.Pen., ale art. 146 ind. 1 lit. a) C.Proc.Pen., respectiv ale art. 157 alin. (1) C.Proc.Pen.)\u00a0acelea\u0219i suspiciuni rezonabile, \u00eentemeiate pe acelea\u0219i date \u0219i informa\u021bii, rezultate din acelea\u0219i probe administrate \u00een cauz\u0103,<\/em><\/i>\u00a0asupra c\u0103rora avea \u00eens\u0103 deja CERTE\u00a0\u2018REPREZENT\u0102RI ANTERIOARE\u2019\u00a0(confirmate de dep\u0103\u0219irea standardului suspiciunii rezonabile, prin utilizarea, \u00een mod direct \u0219i constant, a unor formul\u0103ri specifice unei analize pe fond a acuza\u021biilor re\u021binute \u00een sarcina subsemnatului, respectiv a unor formul\u0103ri specifice unor convingeri consolidate \u0219i definitive\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>(incompatibile cu aceast\u0103 etap\u0103 procesual\u0103),<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u00een sensul descrierii mecanismului infrac\u021bional ca realitate factual\u0103 cert\u0103, cu caracter clandestin, de amploare \u0219i perfec\u021bionat \u00een timp, re\u021binerii implic\u0103rii active, directe \u0219i certe a subsemnatului \u00een activitatea infrac\u021bional\u0103, prezent\u0103rii circuitului sumelor de bani \u0219i a activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale eviden\u021biate de c\u0103tre acuzare ca fapte dovedite\/ fapte confirmate, respectiv atribuirii directe a unei conduite infrac\u021bionale subsemnatului, F\u0102R\u0102 rezerve \u0219i F\u0102R\u0102 nuan\u021b\u0103ri)<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>,<\/em><\/i>\u00a0solu\u021bia asupra propunerii de arestare preventiv\u0103 era v\u0103dit prefigurat\u0103 \u0219i previzibil\u0103\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u2013 \u00een sensul admiterii cererii D.N.A. \u2013 Serviciul Teritorial Cluj,\u00a0<\/em><\/i>tocmai ca rezult\u00e2nd dintr-o OPINIE DEJA FORMAT\u0102<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.6.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Din perspectiva unui observator obiectiv, informat \u0219i rezonabil, rezult\u0103 cu eviden\u021b\u0103 c\u0103\u00a0judec\u0103torul de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi \u00ee\u0219i formase deja, ANTERIOR solu\u021bion\u0103rii propunerii de arestare preventiv\u0103, o OPINIE ANTICIPAT\u0102 asupra aspectelor esen\u021biale ale cauzei. NU este vorba despre simpla participare anterioar\u0103 a judec\u0103torului \u00een proceduri judiciare preliminare, ci despre \u00eemprejurarea c\u0103 acesta validase deja, \u00een termeni de certitudine, \u00eens\u0103\u0219i teza factual\u0103 a acuz\u0103rii, trat\u00e2nd existen\u021ba faptelor, mecanismul pretins infrac\u021bional \u0219i implicarea subsemnatului, ca fiind deja CONTURATE \u0219i CONFIRMATE.<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.7.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00cen aceste condi\u021bii,\u00a0judec\u0103torul NU a mai procedat\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>(la momentul solu\u021bion\u0103rii propunerii de arestare preventiv\u0103)\u00a0la o analiz\u0103 real\u0103, autonom\u0103 \u0219i neutr\u0103 a condi\u021biilor prev\u0103zute de art. 223 C.Proc.Pen., ci s-a limitat, \u00een mod evident, la RECONFIRMAREA propriilor evalu\u0103ri anterioare<\/strong><\/b>. Or, atunci c\u00e2nd acela\u0219i judec\u0103tor este chemat s\u0103 se pronun\u021be ulterior asupra unei m\u0103suri preventive privative de libertate, DUP\u0102 ce exprimase deja, \u00een repetate r\u00e2nduri, concluzii ferme asupra nucleului factual al acuza\u021biilor, aparen\u021ba de impar\u021bialitate este grav afectat\u0103, iar garan\u021bia impar\u021bialit\u0103\u021bii obiective este compromis\u0103.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.8.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Aceast\u0103 concluzie rezult\u0103 \u00een mod direct din considerentele mai multor \u00eencheieri pronun\u021bate anterior, \u00een care au fost utilizate, \u00een mod direct \u0219i constant,\u00a0formul\u0103ri care\u00a0(i)\u00a0relev\u0103 o pozi\u021bionare clar\u0103 a judec\u0103torului, dincolo de rolul s\u0103u de filtru preliminar specific procedurilor de autorizare a unor m\u0103suri intruzive,\u00a0(ii)\u00a0indic\u0103 adoptarea unui standard probator apropiat celui necesar pentru stabilirea vinov\u0103\u021biei, dep\u0103\u0219ind standardul suspiciunii rezonabile \u0219i\u00a0(iii)\u00a0exprim\u0103 \u0219i valideaz\u0103 veritabile constat\u0103ri de fapt, nefire\u0219ti aprecieri factuale asumate de instan\u021b\u0103<\/strong><\/b>,\u00a0ori aprecieri de certitudine<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0dup\u0103 cum dovedesc \u00een cele de urmeaz\u0103:<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (i)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 1862\/C\/P\/2025 din data de 17 octombrie 2025<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 4187\/117\/2025), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a confirmat\/ a \u00eencuviin\u021bat autorizarea unor m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), iar pentru aceasta a concluzionat c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>gravitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale desf\u0103\u0219urate \u0219i calitatea persoanelor implicate, dar \u0219i amploarea fenomenului\u2019<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0conduc\u00a0\u2018la certitudinea c\u0103 modul de operare a fost unul de durat\u0103, perfec\u021bionat \u00een timp<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 400, parag. IV)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Faptele care fac obiectul prezentei cauze prezint\u0103 un grad de periculozitate sporit, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 \u00een cauz\u0103 s-a conturat un mecanism de natur\u0103 a leza iremediabil valoarea social\u0103 const\u00e2nd \u00een probitatea moral\u0103 a func\u021bionarului public, care trebuie s\u0103 guverneze rela\u021biile de serviciu ale acestuia, func\u021bionarul chemat s\u0103 se asigure de corectitudinea sus\u021binerii unui examen fiind acela\u0219i care accept\u0103 primirea de sume de bani pentru a asigura fraudarea acestuia<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 400, parag. final, respectiv fila 400 verso, parag. I)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>m\u0103sura este propor\u021bional\u0103 \u00een raport de gravitatea conduitei func\u021bionarului public care se implic\u0103 \u00een mod direct \u0219i activ \u00een fraudarea examenului, respectiv prin \u00eenm\u00e2narea personal\u0103 a r\u0103spunsurilor la \u00eentreb\u0103ri, dar \u0219i prin prisma mecanismului de fraudare dezvoltat, care porne\u0219te de la candida\u021bii la examen, la intermediari, la persoana care \u021bine leg\u0103tura cu to\u021bi intermediarii \u0219i ulterior la membrul comisiei A.R.R.<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 400 verso, parag. II)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (ii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 2051\/C\/P\/2025 din data de 05 noiembrie 2025<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 4448\/117\/2025), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a \u00eencuviin\u021bat m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>gravitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale desf\u0103\u0219urate \u0219i calitatea persoanelor implicate, dar \u0219i amploarea fenomenului\u2019<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0conduc\u00a0\u2018la certitudinea c\u0103 modul de operare a fost unul de durat\u0103, perfec\u021bionat \u00een timp<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 357, parag. V)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Raportat la pericolul social concret al faptelor \u0219i la modalitatea de comitere, judec\u0103torul apreciaz\u0103 c\u0103 m\u0103surile de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 sunt propor\u021bionale cu restr\u00e2ngerea drepturilor \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bilor fundamentale ale persoanei, iar aceast\u0103 propor\u021bionalitate rezult\u0103 din particularit\u0103\u021bile cauzei \u2013 gravitatea conduitei func\u021bionarului public care se implic\u0103 \u00een mod direct \u0219i activ \u00een fraudarea examenului, respectiv prin \u00eenm\u00e2narea personal\u0103 a r\u0103spunsurilor la \u00eentreb\u0103ri, dar \u0219i prin prisma mecanismului de fraudare dezvoltat, care porne\u0219te de la candida\u021bii la examen, la intermediari, la persoana care \u021bine leg\u0103tura cu to\u021bi intermediarii \u0219i ulterior la membrul comisiei A.R.R. Totodat\u0103, necesitatea \u0219i propor\u021bionalitatea m\u0103surii rezult\u0103 din gravitatea infrac\u021biunilor s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219ite, a clandestinit\u0103\u021bii activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale, dar \u0219i din amploarea \u0219i durata acesteia<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 358, parag. penultim \u0219i ultim)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (iii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 2112\/C\/P\/2025 din data de 18 noiembrie 2025<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 4688\/117\/2025), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a \u00eencuviin\u021bat autorizarea unor m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>gravitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale desf\u0103\u0219urate<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u2019\u00a0<\/em><\/i>este\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>ridicat\u0103 raportat la calitatea persoanelor implicate \u0219i \u00eentinderea \u00een timp a acestei activit\u0103\u021bi, amploarea fenomenului conduc\u00e2nd la certitudinea c\u0103 modul de operare a fost perfec\u021bionat \u00een timp<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 303 verso, parag. penultim)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv c\u0103 m\u0103sura intruziv\u0103\u2019(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>se justific\u0103 raportat la gravitatea conduitei func\u021bionarului public din cadrul A.R.R. \u0219i amploarea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale cercetate<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 304, parag. penultim)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i raport\u00e2ndu-se, \u00een argumentarea solu\u021biei dispuse,\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>la clandestinitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale \u0219i la precau\u021bia cu care se desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103 aceasta<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 304 verso, parag. I)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (iv)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 2301\/C\/P\/2025 din data de 24 noiembrie 2025<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 4801\/117\/2025), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a \u00eencuviin\u021bat prelungirea unor m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 autorizate anterior\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>m\u0103surile solicitate se impun raportat la dificultatea de penetrare a unui asemenea mediu infrac\u021bional care ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 cu discre\u021bie<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 277 verso, parag. V)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Ingerin\u021ba care rezult\u0103 din punerea \u00een aplicare a m\u0103surilor de supraveghere este propor\u021bional\u0103 cu gravitatea faptelor cercetate \u0219i cu scopurile pentru care se \u00eencuviin\u021beaz\u0103 m\u0103sura (\u2026) \u00een cauz\u0103 contur\u00e2ndu-se existen\u021ba unui mecanism complex de fraudare a examenelor privind ob\u021binerea atestatelor, care are prin sine un caracter clandestin, raportat la calitatea persoanelor implicate, dar \u0219i la amploarea fenomenului<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 277 verso, parag. VII)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>au fost documentate p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een prezent trei examene de acest fel, iar tiparul se p\u0103streaz\u0103 la toate, metodele sunt perfec\u021bionate \u00een timp, persoanele angrenate \u00een circuitul infrac\u021bional adapt\u00e2ndu-se la schimb\u0103ri<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 278, parag. IV)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>se p\u0103streaz\u0103 tiparul privind remiterea sumelor de bani de c\u0103tre RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru la apartamentul lui ANTON Cristian<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 278, parag. V)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>dup\u0103 finalizarea examenului, sumele de bani colectate de la intermediari ajung la ANTON Cristian prin intermediul lui RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, care se deplaseaz\u0103 la locuin\u021ba amintit\u0103 (\u2026), aspect ce reiese \u00een urma recurgerii la tehnica de supraveghere instalat\u0103 la fa\u021ba locului<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 278, parag. VI)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i raport\u00e2ndu-se, \u00een argumentarea solu\u021biei dispuse,\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>la clandestinitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale \u0219i la precau\u021bia cu care se desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103 aceasta<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol V, fila 278, parag. VIII)<\/em><\/i>, pentru a certifica c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>numitul ANTON Cristian este cel care, prin modul de operare ales, \u0219i-a expus o loca\u021bie \u00een care \u00ee\u0219i desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103 \u00een parte via\u021ba privat\u0103 \u2013 colectarea banilor ob\u021binu\u021bi din s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219irea de infrac\u021biuni de corup\u021bie comise chiar din postura de director general al Autorit\u0103\u021bii Rutiere Rom\u00e2ne<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 278, parag. VIII)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (v)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 2354\/C\/P\/2025 din data de 27 noiembrie 2025<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 4879\/117\/2025), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a \u00eencuviin\u021bat prelungirea unor m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 autorizate anterior\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>m\u0103surile solicitate se impun raportat la dificultatea de penetrare a unui asemenea mediu infrac\u021bional care ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 cu discre\u021bie<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 222 verso, parag. V)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Ingerin\u021ba care rezult\u0103 din punerea \u00een aplicare a m\u0103surilor de supraveghere este propor\u021bional\u0103 cu gravitatea faptelor cercetate \u0219i cu scopurile pentru care se \u00eencuviin\u021beaz\u0103 m\u0103sura (\u2026) \u00een cauz\u0103 contur\u00e2ndu-se existen\u021ba unui mecanism complex de fraudare a examenelor privind ob\u021binerea atestatelor, care are prin sine un caracter clandestin, raportat la calitatea persoanelor implicate, dar \u0219i la amploarea fenomentului<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 222 verso, parag. VII)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103, \u00een referire direct\u0103 la persoana subsemnatului,\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>s-a confirmat \u00een mod concret c\u0103 acesta este implicat \u00een circuitul infrac\u021bional \u0219i c\u0103 o mare parte din sumele de bani colectate ajung la apartamentul acestuia<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 223, parag. III)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>se constat\u0103 c\u0103 au fost documentate p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een prezent trei examene (Bucure\u0219ti, Arad, Bucure\u0219ti), iar tiparul se p\u0103streaz\u0103, metodele sunt perfec\u021bionate \u00een timp, persoanele implicate \u00een circuitul infrac\u021bional adapt\u00e2ndu-se la schimb\u0103ri<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 223, parag. IV)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>se p\u0103streaz\u0103 tiparul privind remiterea sumelor de bani de c\u0103tre RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru la apartamentul lui ANTON Cristian<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 223, parag. V)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>dup\u0103 finalizarea examenului, sumele de bani colectate de la intermediari ajung la ANTON Cristian prin intermediul lui RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, care se deplaseaz\u0103 la locuin\u021ba amintit\u0103 (\u2026), aspect ce reiese \u00een urma recurgerii la tehnica de supraveghere instalat\u0103 la fa\u021ba locului<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 223, parag. VI)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i raport\u00e2ndu-se, \u00een explicitarea propor\u021bionalit\u0103\u021bii m\u0103surii cu privire direct\u0103 la persoana subsemnatului,\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>la datele concrete existente p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een prezent, care confirm\u0103 implicarea sa<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00een activitatea infrac\u021bional\u0103<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 223 verso, parag. VI)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (vi)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 2368\/C\/P\/2025 din data de 02 decembrie 2025<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 4930\/117\/2025), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a autorizat m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Probele nu s-ar putea ob\u021bine \u00een alt mod raportat la modul de operare, conturat clar la acest moment, \u00een raport de clandestinitatea mecanismului infrac\u021bional \u0219i de precau\u021bia cu care se ac\u021bioneaz\u0103<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 174 verso, parag. IX)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>M\u0103sura este propor\u021bional\u0103 raportat la mecanismul de fraudare dezvoltat, care porne\u0219te de la candida\u021bii la examen, la intermediari, la persoana care \u021bine leg\u0103tura cu to\u021bi intermediarii, respectiv, numitul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u0219i la membrul comisiei A.R.R. \u2013 directorul general al acestei institu\u021bii<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 175, parag. III)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv c\u0103, \u00een referire direct\u0103 la persoana subsemnatului,\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>M\u0103sura este propor\u021bional\u0103 cu gravitatea infrac\u021biunilor \u0219i gravitatea \u00een sine a conduitei func\u021bionarului public care se implic\u0103 \u00een mod direct \u0219i activ \u00een fraudarea unor examene \u2013 \u00eenm\u00e2narea personal\u0103 a r\u0103spunsurilor la \u00eentreb\u0103ri<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 175 verso, parag. II)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>M\u0103sura supravegherii \u00een spa\u021bii private este justificat\u0103 de gravitatea conduitei func\u021bionarului public din cadrul A.R.R. \u0219i de amploarea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale cercetate<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 175 verso, parag. IV)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (vii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 2527\/C\/P\/2025 din data de 12 decembrie 2025<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 5084\/117\/2025), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a confirmat\/ a \u00eencuviin\u021bat autorizarea unor m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00een cauz\u0103 se contureaz\u0103 existen\u021ba unui mecanism complex de fraudare a examenelor privind ob\u021binerea atestatelor, care are prin sine un caracter clandestin, raportat la gravitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale desf\u0103\u0219urate \u0219i la calitatea persoanelor implicate, dar \u0219i la amploarea fenomenului<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 123 verso, parag. VII)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Faptele care fac obiectul prezentei cauze prezint\u0103 un grad de periculozitate sporit\u0103, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 \u00een cauz\u0103 s-a conturat un mecanism de natur\u0103 a leza iremediabil valoarea social\u0103 const\u00e2nd \u00een probitatea moral\u0103 a func\u021bionarului public, care trebuie s\u0103 guverneze rela\u021biile de serviciu ale acestuia, func\u021bionarul chemat s\u0103 se asigure de corectitudinea sus\u021binerii unui examen fiind acela\u0219i care accept\u0103 primirea de sume de bani pentru a asigura fraudarea acestuia<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 124, parag. III)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>m\u0103sura este propor\u021bional\u0103 \u00een raport de gravitatea conduitei func\u021bionarului public care se implic\u0103 \u00een mod direct \u0219i activ \u00een fraudarea examenului, respectiv prin \u00eenm\u00e2narea personal\u0103 a r\u0103spunsurilor la \u00eentreb\u0103ri, dar \u0219i prin prisma mecanismului de fraudare dezvoltat, care porne\u0219te de la candida\u021bi, la intermediari, la persoana care \u021bine leg\u0103tura cu to\u021bi intermediarii \u0219i ulterior la membrii comisiei A.R.R.<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 124, parag. IV)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv c\u0103 m\u0103sura intruziv\u0103\u2019(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>a fost necesar\u0103 \u00een raport de gravitatea conduitei func\u021bionarului public din cadrul A.R.R. \u0219i de amploarea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale cercetate<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 124, parag. VIII)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i raport\u00e2ndu-se, \u00een argumentarea solu\u021biei dispuse,\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>la clandestinitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale \u0219i la precau\u021bia cu care se desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103 aceasta<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 124, parag. final)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (viii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 2451\/C\/P\/2025 din data de 09 decembrie 2025<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 5024\/117\/2025), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a autorizat m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u2019(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>gravitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale desf\u0103\u0219urate<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u2019\u00a0<\/em><\/i>este\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>ridicat\u0103 raportat la calitatea persoanelor implicate \u0219i \u00eentinderea \u00een timp a acestei activit\u0103\u021bi, amploarea fenomenului conduc\u00e2nd la certitudinea c\u0103 modul de operare a fost perfec\u021bionat \u00een timp<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 77, parag. V)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (ix)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 2543\/C\/P\/2025 din data de 15 decembrie 2025<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 5123\/117\/2025), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a \u00eencuviin\u021bat prelungirea unor m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 autorizate anterior\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>m\u0103surile de supraveghere se impun raportat la dificultatea de penetrare a unui asemenea mediu infrac\u021bional, care ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 cu discre\u021bie<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 14 verso, parag. II)<\/em><\/i>, referindu-se la\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>amploarea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale, mecanismul adoptat \u00een concret gener\u00e2nd sume de bani extrem de ridicate, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103, \u00een fiecare lun\u0103, numitul ANTON Cristian este membru \u00een comisia de examinare din mun. Bucure\u0219ti, din jud. Arad \u0219i din jud. Mehedin\u021bi\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 14 verso, parag. III)<\/em><\/i>, concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Ingerin\u021ba care rezult\u0103 din punerea \u00een aplicare a m\u0103surilor de supraveghere este propor\u021bional\u0103 cu gravitatea faptelor cercetate \u0219i cu scopurile pentru care se \u00eencuviin\u021beaz\u0103 m\u0103sura (\u2026) \u00een cauz\u0103 contur\u00e2ndu-se existen\u021ba unui mecanism complex de fraudare a examenelor privind ob\u021binerea atestatelor, care are prin sine un caracter clandestin, raportat la calitatea persoanelor implicate, dar \u0219i la amploarea fenomenului<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 14 verso, parag. IV)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>importan\u021ba informa\u021biilor ob\u021binute prin aceast\u0103 metod\u0103 de cercetare este de net\u0103g\u0103duit, raportat la num\u0103rul mare de candida\u021bi \u0219i intermediari implica\u021bi \u00een activitatea infrac\u021bional\u0103<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 14 verso, parag. VI)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Necesitatea prelungirii m\u0103surilor dispuse cu privire la ANTON Cristian transpare \u00een mod clar din faptul c\u0103 s-a confirmat \u00een mod concret c\u0103 acesta este implicat \u00een circuitul infrac\u021bional \u0219i c\u0103 o mare parte din sumele de bani colectate ajung la apartamentul acestuia<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 14 verso, parag. VII)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103 prelungirea m\u0103surilor este raportat\u0103 \u0219i\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>la activitatea cu caracter de continuitate desf\u0103\u0219urat\u0103 de c\u0103tre numitul ANTON Cristian, la care ajunge o mare parte din sumele de bani colectate\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 15, parag. VI)<\/em><\/i>, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>se p\u0103streaz\u0103 tiparul privind remiterea sumelor de bani de c\u0103tre RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru la apartamentul lui ANTON Cristian<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 15, parag. IX)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>atingerea adus\u0103 vie\u021bii private a lui ANTON Cristian va fi propor\u021bional\u0103 cu modul de operare ales, acesta \u00eensu\u0219i expun\u00e2ndu-\u0219i locul unde \u00ee\u0219i desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103 via\u021ba privat\u0103 ca mediu \u00een care colecteaz\u0103 banii ob\u021binu\u021bi din s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219irea de infrac\u021biuni de corup\u021bie, comise din postura de director general al Autorit\u0103\u021bii Rutiere Rom\u00e2ne<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. V, fila 15 verso, parag. II)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (x)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 577\/C\/P\/2026 din data de 26 februarie 2026<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 926\/117\/2026), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a autorizat m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), (re)concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>gravitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale desf\u0103\u0219urate<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019<\/em><\/i>\u00a0<\/em><\/i>este\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>ridicat\u0103 raportat la calitatea persoanelor implicate \u0219i \u00eentinderea \u00een timp a acestei activit\u0103\u021bi, amploarea fenomenului conduc\u00e2nd la certitudinea c\u0103 modul de operare a fost perfec\u021bionat \u00een timp<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea I, fila 105 verso, parag. VI)<\/em><\/i>, referindu-se la\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>starea de alert\u0103 \u0219i precau\u021bie \u00een care se reg\u0103sesc persoanele angrenate \u00een circuitul infrac\u021bional, care \u0219i-au perfectat la acest moment modul de operare<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea I, fila 105 verso, parag. VIII)<\/em><\/i>, apreciind c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Faptele care fac obiectul prezentei cauze prezint\u0103 un grad de periculozitate sporit\u0103 (\u2026), fa\u021b\u0103 de valoarea obiectului infrac\u021biunilor de corup\u021bie \u0219i raportat la num\u0103rul mare de candida\u021bi \u0219i intermediari implica\u021bi \u00een activitatea infrac\u021bional\u0103 exist\u00e2nd propor\u021bionalitate cu atingerea adus\u0103 unor drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi fundamentale ale persoanelor supravegheate<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea I, fila 106, parag. II)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i re\u021bin\u00e2nd c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>mecanismul de fraudare al examenelor s-a dezvoltat \u00een timp, porne\u0219te de la candida\u021bii la examen, la intermediari, la persoana care \u021bine leg\u0103tura cu to\u021bi intermediarii \u0219i la membrii comisiei A.R.R., exist\u00e2nd o ritmicitate a examenelor la care ANTON Cristian particip\u0103, \u00een calitate de membru al comisiei de examinare, \u0219i o participare constant\u0103 a lui RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru la toate examenele la care ANTON Cristian este membru \u00een comisia de examinare<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea I, fila 106, parag. III)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (xi)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 613\/C\/P\/2026 din data de 03 martie 2026<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 1011\/117\/2026), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a prelungit \u0219i a autorizat m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), (re)apreciind c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Faptele care fac obiectul prezentei cauze prezint\u0103 un grad de periculozitate sporit, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 \u00een cauz\u0103 s-a conturat un mecanism de natur\u0103 a leza iremediabil valoarea social\u0103 const\u00e2nd \u00een probitatea moral\u0103 a func\u021bionarului public, care trebuie s\u0103 guverneze rela\u021biile de serviciu ale acestuia, func\u021bionarul chemat s\u0103 se asigure de corectitudinea sus\u021binerii unui examen fiind acela\u0219i care accept\u0103 primirea de sume de bani pentru a asigura fraudarea acestuia, chiar din postura de director general al unei institu\u021bii centrale din cadrul Ministerului Transporturilor<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea I, fila 18 verso, parag. IX)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>m\u0103sura este propor\u021bional\u0103 \u00een raport de gravitatea conduitei func\u021bionarului public care se implic\u0103 \u00een mod direct \u0219i activ \u00een fraudarea examenului, respectiv prin \u00eenm\u00e2narea personal\u0103 a r\u0103spunsurilor la \u00eentreb\u0103ri, dar \u0219i prin prisma mecanismului de fraudare dezvoltat, care porne\u0219te de la candida\u021bii la examen, la intermediari, la persoana care \u021bine leg\u0103tura cu to\u021bi intermediarii \u0219i ulterior la membrul comisiei A.R.R. \u2013 directorul general al acestei institu\u021bii<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea I, fila 18 verso, parag. X)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i raport\u00e2ndu-se, \u00een argumentarea solu\u021biei dispuse,\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>la clandestinitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale \u0219i la precau\u021bia cu care se desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103 aceasta<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea I, fila 19, parag. VII)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (xii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 234\/C\/P\/2026 din data de 27 ianuarie 2026<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 257\/117\/2026), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a autorizat m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u2019(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>gravitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale desf\u0103\u0219urate<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u2019\u00a0<\/em><\/i>este\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>ridicat\u0103 raportat la calitatea persoanelor implicate \u0219i \u00eentinderea \u00een timp a acestei activit\u0103\u021bi, amploarea fenomenului conduc\u00e2nd la certitudinea c\u0103 modul de operare a fost perfec\u021bionat \u00een timp<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea II, fila 350 verso, parag. final, respectiv fila 351, parag. I)<\/em><\/i>, raport\u00e2ndu-se, \u00een argumentarea solu\u021biei dispuse, la\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>persisten\u021ba infrac\u021bional\u0103 a numitului ANTON Cristian<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea II, fila 351, parag. V)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv la\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>modul de operare, conturat clar la acest moment, pionii principali ai mecanismului infrac\u021bional fiind ANTON Cristian \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea II, fila 351, parag. VIII)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i eviden\u021biind c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>m\u0103sura apare necesar\u0103 \u00een raport de gravitatea conduitei func\u021bionarului public din cadrul A.R.R. \u0219i de amploarea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea II, fila 351 verso, parag. VIII)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (xiii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 397\/C\/P\/2026 din data de 10 februarie 2026<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 552\/117\/2026), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a confirmat m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 autorizate provizoriu de procurorul de caz, concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u2019(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Faptele care fac obiectul prezentei cauze prezint\u0103 un grad de periculozitate sporit\u0103, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 \u00een cauz\u0103 s-a conturat un mecanism de natur\u0103 a leza iremediabil valoarea social\u0103 const\u00e2nd \u00een probitatea moral\u0103 a func\u021bionarului public, care trebuie s\u0103 guverneze rela\u021biile de serviciu ale acestuia, func\u021bionarul chemat s\u0103 se asigure de corectitudinea sus\u021binerii unui examen fiind acela\u0219i care accept\u0103 primirea de sume de bani pentru a asigura fraudarea acestuia, angren\u00e2nd \u00een acest circuit ilicit un num\u0103r extrem de ridicat de persoane<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea II, fila 278, parag. IX)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>m\u0103sura este propor\u021bional\u0103 \u00een raport de mecanismului de fraudare dezvoltat, care porne\u0219te de la candida\u021bii la examen, la intermediari, la persoana care \u021bine leg\u0103tura cu to\u021bi intermediarii \u0219i ulterior la membrii comisiei A.R.R.<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VI, partea II, fila 278, parag. X)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (xiv)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 2358\/C\/P\/2025 din data de 28 noiembrie 2025<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 4888\/117\/2025), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a autorizat m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u2019(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Astfel cum rezult\u0103 din starea de fapt, exist\u0103 un mecanism complex de fraudare a examenelor privind ob\u021binerea atestatelor, iar gravitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale desf\u0103\u0219urate \u0219i calitatea persoanelor implicate, dar \u0219i amploarea fenomenului, justific\u0103 autorizarea la baza de date A.R.R.<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VII, fila 186, parag. IV)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv c\u0103 m\u0103sura de supraveghere este justificat\u0103 de\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>gravitatea faptelor \u0219i consecin\u021ba deosebit de periculoas\u0103 a promov\u0103rii frauduloase a examenului \u2013 ob\u021binerea atestatelor de c\u0103tre persoane care nu au o baz\u0103 teoretic\u0103 suficient\u0103 sau corespunz\u0103toare desf\u0103\u0219ur\u0103rii activit\u0103\u021bilor pentru care sunt autoriza\u021bi, respectiv transport profesional de persoane\/ m\u0103rfuri, inclusiv periculoase sau agabaritice.<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VII, fila 186, parag. VIII)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (xv)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 747\/C\/P\/2026 din data de 16 martie 2026<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 1265\/117\/2026), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a \u00eencuviin\u021bat prelungirea \u0219i luarea unor m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), apreciind \u0219i concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u2019(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>activitatea infrac\u021bional\u0103 care face obiectul cercet\u0103rilor<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u2019\u00a0<\/em><\/i>este\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>extrem de grav\u0103, \u00een cauz\u0103 contur\u00e2ndu-se existen\u021ba unui mecanism complex de fraudare a examenelor privind ob\u021binerea diferitelor atestate, activitatea av\u00e2nd \u00een sine un caracter clandestin.<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VII, fila 83 verso, parag. V)<\/em><\/i>, respectiv c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00een cauz\u0103 s-a conturat un mecanism de natur\u0103 a leza valoarea social\u0103 const\u00e2nd \u00een probitatea moral\u0103 a func\u021bionarului public, care trebuie s\u0103 guverneze rela\u021biile de serviciu ale acestuia, dar \u0219i \u00een siguran\u021ba circula\u021biei pe drumurile publice, dat fiind num\u0103rul mare de candida\u021bi care promoveaz\u0103 examenele pentru ob\u021binerea atestatelor f\u0103r\u0103 a avea o baz\u0103 teoretic\u0103 \u00een acest sens<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VII, fila 83 verso, parag. IX)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i raport\u00e2ndu-se, \u00een argumentarea solu\u021biei dispuse,\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>la clandestinitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale \u0219i la precau\u021bia cu care se desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103 aceasta<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VII, fila 84, parag. VI)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (xvi)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 859\/C\/P\/2026 din data de 26 martie 2026<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 1503\/117\/2026), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a \u00eencuviin\u021bat prelungirea \u0219i luarea unor m\u0103suri de supraveghere tehnic\u0103\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 aferente), apreciind \u0219i concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103\u2019(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>activitatea infrac\u021bional\u0103 care face obiectul cercet\u0103rilor<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u2019\u00a0<\/em><\/i>este\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>extrem de grav\u0103, \u00een cauz\u0103 contur\u00e2ndu-se existen\u021ba unui mecanism complex de fraudare a examenelor privind ob\u021binerea diferitelor atestate, activitatea av\u00e2nd \u00een sine un caracter clandestin.<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VII, fila 21, parag. IV)<\/em><\/i>, f\u0103c\u00e2nd referire direct\u0103 \u0219i clar\u0103 la\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>amploarea fenomenului, modul de operare fiind unul de durat\u0103 \u0219i perfec\u021bionat \u00een timp<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VII, fila 21, parag. V, teza final\u0103)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i stabilind, la nivel de certitudine, c\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00een cauz\u0103 s-a conturat un mecanism de natur\u0103 a leza valoarea social\u0103 const\u00e2nd \u00een probitatea moral\u0103 a func\u021bionarului public, care trebuie s\u0103 guverneze rela\u021biile de serviciu ale acestuia, dar \u0219i \u00een siguran\u021ba circula\u021biei pe drumurile publice, dat fiind num\u0103rul mare de candida\u021bi care promoveaz\u0103 examenele pentru ob\u021binerea atestatelor f\u0103r\u0103 a avea o baz\u0103 teoretic\u0103 \u00een acest sens<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VII, fila 21, parag. VIII)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i raport\u00e2ndu-se, \u00een argumentarea solu\u021biei dispuse, din nou,\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>la clandestinitatea activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale \u0219i la precau\u021bia cu care se desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103 aceasta<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. VII, fila 21, parag. penultim)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (xvii)\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 2355\/C\/P\/2025 din data de 27 noiembrie 2025<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Dosarul nr. 4880\/117\/2025), prin care doamna GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina, \u00een calitate de judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, a \u00eencuviin\u021bat cererile D.N.A. \u2013 Serviciul Teritorial Cluj de ob\u021binere a datelor privind tranzac\u021biile financiare ale subsemnatului \u0219i ale membrilor familiei\u00a0(emi\u021b\u00e2nd \u0219i mandatele prin care a fost autorizat\u0103 ob\u021binerea datelor privind aceste tranzac\u021bii financiare), apreciind \u0219i concluzion\u00e2nd, la nivel de certitudine, c\u0103\u2019(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00een cauz\u0103 exist\u0103 un mecanism complex de fraudare a examenelor de ob\u021binere a atestatelor<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. X, fila 39 verso, parag. IV teza ini\u021bial\u0103)<\/em><\/i>, ar\u0103t\u00e2nd, \u00een referire expres\u0103 la persoana subsemnatului, c\u0103 din procesul-verbal de redare a comunic\u0103rilor ambientale rezult\u0103\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>date clare c\u0103 aceast\u0103 persoan\u0103 de\u021bine sume importante de bani (din infrac\u021biuni de corup\u021bie)<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. X, fila 39 verso, parag. IV teza final\u0103)<\/em><\/i>, argument\u00e2nd necesitatea autoriz\u0103rii ob\u021binerii datelor privind tranzac\u021biile financiare \u00een raport\u2019(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>de modalitatea de comitere a infrac\u021biunilor de corup\u021bie, de caracterul inerent clandestin al acestora, de m\u0103surile de precau\u021bie pe care \u0219i le iau persoanelor angrenate \u00een circuitul financiar<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. X, fila 39 verso, parag. final)<\/em><\/i>, re\u021bin\u00e2nd cu claritate c\u0103 gravitatea infrac\u021biunilor rezid\u0103 \u00een\u00a0\u2018(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>mecanismul de fraudare dezvoltat, care porne\u0219te de la candida\u021bii la examen, la intermediari, la persoana care \u021bine leg\u0103tura cu to\u021bi intermediarii \u0219i, ulterior, la membrul comisiei A.R.R. \u2013 directorul general al acestei institu\u021bii<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. X, fila 40, parag. IV)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i c\u0103\u2019(\u2026)\u00a0<\/em><\/i>fapta este grav\u0103 \u0219i fa\u021b\u0103 de consecin\u021ba imediat\u0103 a promov\u0103rii frauduloase a examenului \u2013 ob\u021binerea atestatelor de c\u0103tre persoane care nu au o baz\u0103 teoretic\u0103 suficient\u0103 sau corespunz\u0103toare desf\u0103\u0219ur\u0103rii activit\u0103\u021bilor pentru care sunt autoriza\u021bi, respectiv transport profesional de persoane\/ m\u0103rfuri, inclusiv periculoase sau agabaritice.<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019. (a se vedea D.U.P., vol. X, fila 40, parag. V)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.9.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Or,\u00a0asemenea formul\u0103ri NU exprim\u0103 o simpl\u0103 verificare sumar\u0103 a condi\u021biilor legale necesare autoriz\u0103rii unor m\u0103suri procesuale, ci relev\u0103 faptul c\u0103 judec\u0103torul dep\u0103\u0219ise deja rolul de filtru preliminar, av\u00e2nd, \u00een termeni de certitudine, o CONVINGERE JUDICIAR\u0102 DEJA CRISTALIZAT\u0102<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0asupra existen\u021bei mecanismului infrac\u021bional, asupra modului \u0219i circumstan\u021belor de s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219ire a faptelor imputate, asupra implic\u0103rii directe a subsemnatului \u0219i asupra realit\u0103\u021bii tezei acuzatorii formulate \u00eempotriva mea.<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0Tocmai aceasta este \u00eemprejurarea care diferen\u021biaz\u0103 prezenta situa\u021bie de ipoteza obi\u0219nuit\u0103 \u00een care un judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi autorizeaz\u0103 anterior m\u0103suri intruzive f\u0103r\u0103 a deveni, prin aceasta, incompatibil. \u00cen spe\u021b\u0103,\u00a0problema nu rezid\u0103 \u00een simpla implicare anterioar\u0103 a aceluia\u0219i judec\u0103tor, ci \u00een \u00eentinderea \u0219i con\u021binutul evalu\u0103rilor deja exteriorizate de c\u0103tre acesta<\/strong><\/b>.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.10.\u00a0\u00a0Prin urmare, la momentul solu\u021bion\u0103rii propunerii de arestare preventiv\u0103, doamna judec\u0103tor GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina NU mai ap\u0103rea, \u00een mod obiectiv, ca fiind \u00een pozi\u021bia de a reevalua cu deplin\u0103 neutralitate acelea\u0219i date, acelea\u0219i informa\u021bii \u0219i acelea\u0219i probe, ci ca titularul unei opinii deja formate \u0219i exprimate anterior \u00een termeni de certitudine \u2013 condi\u021bii \u00een care,\u00a0din perspectiva standardului aparen\u021bei de impar\u021bialitate, devine evident c\u0103 judec\u0103torul de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi NU mai oferea garan\u021biile necesare unei examin\u0103ri independente \u0219i efective a cererii de arestare preventiv\u0103<\/strong><\/b>.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.11.\u00a0\u00a0\u00cen raport de \u00eemprejur\u0103rile expuse anterior, rezult\u0103 existen\u021ba unei suspiciuni legitime \u0219i rezonabile c\u0103\u00a0doamna judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina se afla \u00eentr-o situa\u021bie care impunea formularea unei cereri de ab\u021binere<\/strong><\/b>, \u00een sensul dispozi\u021biilor procesual penale incidente privind garantarea impar\u021bialit\u0103\u021bii instan\u021bei. Din perspectiva unui observator obiectiv, informat \u0219i rezonabil, succesiunea actelor procesuale anterior pronun\u021bate, precum \u0219i con\u021binutul considerentelor acestora\u00a0(\u00een care sunt utilizate formul\u0103ri de certitudine cu privire la existen\u021ba mecanismului infrac\u021bional, la modul de operare \u0219i la implicarea subsemnatului)\u00a0erau \u0219i sunt de natur\u0103 s\u0103 creeze o aparen\u021b\u0103 serioas\u0103 de lips\u0103 de impar\u021bialitate, incompatibil\u0103 cu exigen\u021bele unui proces echitabil. \u00cen aceste condi\u021bii,\u00a0neformularea unei cereri de ab\u021binere \u00een momentul solu\u021bion\u0103rii propunerii de arestare preventiv\u0103 este de natur\u0103 s\u0103 atrag\u0103 inciden\u021ba abaterii disciplinare prev\u0103zute de art. 271 lit. h)<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0din\u00a0Legea nr. 303\/2022<\/strong><\/b>, iar\u00a0pentru c\u0103 situa\u021bia descris\u0103 se circumscrie \u00een mod evident \u0219i unui caz legal de incompatibilitate, \u0219i pe cea prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 271 lit. a) din aceea\u0219i lege.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.12.\u00a0\u00a0Ap\u0103rarea eviden\u021biaz\u0103 c\u0103, potrivit art. 21 alin. (3) teza \u00eent\u00e2i din Constitu\u0163ie,\u00a0\u2018p\u0103r\u0163ile au dreptul la un proces echitabil (\u2026)\u201c,\u00a0iar, potrivit art. 6 din Conven\u0163ia pentru ap\u0103rarea drepturilor omului \u015fi a libert\u0103\u0163ilor fundamentale,\u00a0\u2018orice persoan\u0103 are dreptul la judecarea cauzei sale \u00een mod echitabil, \u00een mod public \u015fi \u00een termen rezonabil, de c\u0103tre o instan\u0163\u0103 independent\u0103 \u015fi IMPAR\u0162IAL\u0102, instituit\u0103 de lege, care va hot\u0103r\u00ee fie asupra \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii drepturilor \u015fi obliga\u0163iilor sale cu caracter civil, fie asupra temeiniciei oric\u0103rei acuza\u0163ii \u00een materie penal\u0103 \u00eendreptate \u00eempotriva sa\u201c.\u00a0Astfel,\u00a0un element esen\u0163ial al dreptului la un proces echitabil \u00eel constituie independen\u0163a \u015fi IMPAR\u0162IALITATEA INSTAN\u0162EI, aceasta din urm\u0103 definindu-se, de regul\u0103, prin LIPSA ORIC\u0102REI PREJUDEC\u0102\u0162I sau ATITUDINI P\u0102RTINITOARE<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(a se vedea Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea din 21 decembrie 2000, pronun\u0163at\u0103 \u00een Cauza WETTSTEIN \u00eempotriva Elve\u0163iei, paragrafele 42-43).<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.13.\u00a0\u00a0\u00centr-o societate democratic\u0103, \u00eencrederea pe care instan\u021bele de judecat\u0103 trebuie s\u0103 o inspire justi\u021biabililor constituie o component\u0103 esen\u021bial\u0103 a dreptului la un proces echitabil. Aceast\u0103 exigen\u021b\u0103 este cu at\u00e2t mai accentuat\u0103 \u00een materia m\u0103surilor preventive privative de libertate, unde judec\u0103torul este chemat s\u0103 decid\u0103 asupra celui mai important atribut al persoanei \u2013 libertatea individual\u0103. Or, \u00een contextul particular al prezentei cauze, succesiunea actelor procesuale anterior pronun\u021bate de doamna judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi GRECU Camelia\u2013Dorina, precum \u0219i con\u021binutul considerentelor prin care aceasta a validat \u00een mod repetat, \u00een termeni de certitudine, aceea\u0219i tez\u0103 factual\u0103 a acuz\u0103rii, sunt de natur\u0103 s\u0103 afecteze \u00een mod serios \u00eencrederea legitim\u0103 c\u0103 propunerea de arestare preventiv\u0103 a fost examinat\u0103 de un judec\u0103tor aflat \u00eentr-o pozi\u021bie de deplin\u0103 neutralitate \u0219i echidistan\u021b\u0103. Prin urmare, elementele expuse anterior contureaz\u0103 existen\u021ba unei suspiciuni obiective \u0219i rezonabile privind afectarea aparen\u021bei de impar\u021bialitate a doamnei judec\u0103tor de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina. Aceast\u0103 temere nu are un caracter subiectiv, ci se \u00eentemeiaz\u0103 pe \u00eemprejur\u0103ri concrete \u0219i verificabile, care demonstreaz\u0103 c\u0103 analiza condi\u021biilor de legalitate \u0219i temeinicie a m\u0103surii arest\u0103rii preventive nu a fost realizat\u0103 de c\u0103tre un judec\u0103tor aflat \u00eentr-o pozi\u021bie de deplin\u0103 neutralitate.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.14.\u00a0\u00a0\u00cen al doilea r\u00e2nd<\/em><\/i>, din perpectiva dispozi\u021biilor art. 271 lit. r) din Legea nr. 303\/2022, const\u00e2nd \u00een LIPSA TOTAL\u0102 a motiv\u0103rii solu\u021biei de arestare preventiv\u0103 a subsemnatului, v\u0103 rog s\u0103 observa\u021bi c\u0103, potrivit dispozi\u021biilor\u00a0art. 203 alin. (5) C.Proc.Pen<\/strong><\/b>.,\u00a0\u2018\u00cen cursul urm\u0103rii penale, (\u2026) cererile, propunerile (\u2026) privitoare la m\u0103surile preventive se solu\u021bioneaz\u0103 \u00een camera de consiliu,\u00a0PRIN \u00ceNCHEIERE MOTIVAT\u0102<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019, iar potrivit dispozi\u021biilor\u00a0art. 226 alin. (1) C.Proc.Pen<\/strong><\/b>.,\u00a0\u2018Judec\u0103torul de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, dac\u0103 apreciaz\u0103 c\u0103 sunt \u00eentrunite condi\u021biile prev\u0103zute de lege, admite propunerea procurorului \u0219i\u00a0dispune arestarea preventiv\u0103 a inculpatului, PRIN \u00ceNCHEIERE MOTIVAT\u0102<\/strong><\/b>\u2019., dup\u0103 cum, potrivit dispozi\u021biilor\u00a0art. 280 alin. (1) C.Proc.Pen<\/strong><\/b>.,\u00a0\u2018\u00eenc\u0103lcarea dispozi\u021biilor legale care reglementeaz\u0103 desf\u0103\u0219urarea procesului penal atrage\u00a0NULITATEA ACTULUI<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u00een condi\u021biile prev\u0103zute expres de prezentul cod\u2019.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.15.\u00a0\u00a0Or, din \u00eenscrisurile anexate rezult\u0103 c\u0103, \u00een cauz\u0103,\u00a0<\/em><\/i>judec\u0103torul de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi NU a realizat o analiz\u0103 judiciar\u0103 proprie, efectiv\u0103 \u0219i autonom\u0103, ci a preluat \u00een mod formal \u0219i, \u00een propor\u021bie cov\u00e2r\u0219itoare, con\u021binutul Referatului D.N.A. \u2013 S.T. Cluj nr. 4697\/159\/P\/2024 din 01 aprilie 2026<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>. \u00cen concret, motivarea \u00eencheierii NU exprim\u0103 un ra\u021bionament judiciar distinct, rezultat din evaluarea personal\u0103 a probelor, a sus\u021binerilor procurorului, a ap\u0103r\u0103rilor formulate \u0219i a condi\u021biilor prev\u0103zute de lege pentru luarea m\u0103surii arest\u0103rii preventive, ci\u00a0<\/em><\/i>este construit\u0103 direct pe strutura, pe con\u021binutul \u0219i pe formul\u0103rile referatului procurorului\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>(preluate extensiv, inclusiv la nivel de exprimare de organizare a argumenta\u021biei)<\/em><\/i>\u00a0\u0219i reproduce, aproape integral, expunerea acuz\u0103rii, cu minime interven\u021bii de tehnoredactare \u0219i f\u0103r\u0103 o veritabil\u0103 individualizare a analizei judiciare<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(interven\u021biile instan\u021bei fiind minime \u0219i pur formale, F\u0102R\u0102 a modifica substan\u021ba expunerii \u2013 ceea ce demonstreaz\u0103 inexisten\u021ba unui ra\u021bionament judiciar propriu).<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.16.\u00a0\u00a0Din analiza obiectiv\u0103 a \u00cencheierii penale nr. 953\/C\/2026 nu rezult\u0103 c\u0103 doamna judec\u0103tor GRECU Camelia \u2013 Dorina ar fi efectuat o examinare proprie a actelor \u0219i lucr\u0103rilor dosarului, a criticilor formulate de inculpa\u021bi, a pozi\u021biei procesuale a fiec\u0103ruia \u0219i a necesit\u0103\u021bii concrete de a dispune arestarea preventiv\u0103, \u00een raport cu posibilitatea aplic\u0103rii unei m\u0103suri preventive mai pu\u021bin intruzive. Totodat\u0103,\u00a0NU rezult\u0103 o analiz\u0103 real\u0103 \u0219i efectiv\u0103 a \u00eendeplinirii condi\u021biilor de legalitate \u0219i temeinicie prev\u0103zute de lege, \u00een raport de ap\u0103r\u0103rile formulate \u0219i de particularit\u0103\u021bile individuale ale cauzei<\/strong><\/b>.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.17.\u00a0\u00a0Aceast\u0103 absen\u021b\u0103 a ra\u021bionamentului judiciar propriu NU reprezint\u0103 o simpl\u0103 omisiune de motivare, ci rezult\u0103 direct din modalitatea de redactare a \u00eencheierii, caracterizat\u0103 prin preluarea extensiv\u0103 \u0219i necritic\u0103 a con\u021binutului referatului procurorului, F\u0102R\u0102 interven\u021bii reale ale instan\u021bei \u00een sensul unei evalu\u0103ri autonome a probelor \u0219i ap\u0103r\u0103rilor formulate.<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.18.\u00a0\u00a0De\u0219i \u00een cuprinsul \u00eencheierii sunt utilizate sintagme\/ expresii\/ formule precum\u00a0\u2018judec\u0103torul consider\u0103 c\u0103\u2019 (pag. 120, parag. V),\u00a0\u2018judec\u0103torul de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi re\u021bine\u2019 (pag. 120, parag. VII),\u00a0\u2018observ\u00e2nd c\u0103\u2019 (pag. 120, parag. VI),\u00a0\u2018judec\u0103torul nu poate dec\u00e2t s\u0103 concluzioneze\u2019 (pag. 120, parag. XII)\u00a0sau \u2018judec\u0103torul observ\u0103\u2019 (pag. 123, parag. III), \u00eencerc\u00e2nd a crea aparen\u021ba unor reale \u0219i personale analize \u0219i dezleg\u0103ri oferite cauzei deduse judec\u0103\u021bii, v\u0103 rog s\u0103 observa\u021bi c\u0103\u00a0<\/em><\/i>aceste sintagme nu sunt urmate, \u00een realitate, de o motivare proprie, ci doar de reluarea aproape ad litteram a con\u021binutului referatului procurorului<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>.\u00a0Astfel,\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00een majoritatea cov\u00e2r\u0219itoare a considerentelor, \u00eencheierea reproduce aceea\u0219i ordine a expunerii, aceea\u0219i selec\u021bie a probelor, acelea\u0219i formul\u0103ri descriptive \u0219i acelea\u0219i concluzii factuale ale acuz\u0103rii, completate doar cu unele expresii introductive ori cu considera\u021bii generale, teoretice, care nu sunt transpuse concret asupra datelor particulare ale cauzei \u0219i asupra situa\u021biei individuale a fiec\u0103rui inculpat<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.19.\u00a0\u00a0O asemenea modalitate de redactare nu satisface exigen\u021ba legal\u0103 a motiv\u0103rii. Preluarea integral\u0103 a referatului procurorului, a analizei acestuia asupra probelor administrate \u00een cursul urm\u0103ririi penale \u0219i a situa\u021biei de fapt imputate inculpa\u021bilor transform\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 \u00eentr-o\u00a0validare formal\u0103 a perspectivei acuz\u0103rii<\/strong><\/b>, iar nu \u00eentr-un act jurisdic\u021bional rezultat dintr-o analiz\u0103 independent\u0103 \u0219i efectiv\u0103. \u00cen acest mod,\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00eencheierea NU mai reflect\u0103 propriul ra\u021bionament al judec\u0103torului, ci exclusiv teza acuzatorie, preluat\u0103 \u0219i asumat\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 distan\u021ba critic\u0103 \u0219i f\u0103r\u0103 evaluarea autonom\u0103 pe care legea o impune<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.20.\u00a0\u00a0\u00cen acest sens, ap\u0103rarea face trimitere, exemplificativ\u0103, la\u00a0utilizarea \u00een cuprinsul pretinsei motiv\u0103ri a unor sintagme\/expresii\/descrieri cu con\u021binut fie SIMILAR<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(sensul fiind \u00eens\u0103 identic, diferen\u021ba fiind dat\u0103 strict de utilizarea unor cuvinte\/expresii diferite),\u00a0fie IDENTIC\/aproape IDENTIC, COPIATE fiind din Referatul D.N.A.<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0prin metoda copy-paste, modalitatea de tehnoredactare<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(caracterizat\u0103 inclusiv prin preluarea acelora\u0219i prescurt\u0103ri ale cuvintelor (exemplu. \u2018Mun. Bucure\u0219ti), a acelora\u0219i explica\u021bii inserate \u00eentre paranteze, cu ad\u0103ugarea\/ eliminarea unor simple cuvinte sau cu reformularea unor expresii\/ sintagme \u2013 bolduite \u00een tabelul de mai jos, pentru a eviden\u021bia minima \u0219i irelevanta interven\u021bie a judec\u0103torului)\u00a0contur\u00e2nd cu claritate ipoteza \u00een care<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u00eencheierea Tribunalului Cluj NU reprezint\u0103 rezultatul unei motiv\u0103ri judiciare autonome<\/strong><\/b>, fiind tehnoredactat\u0103 DIRECT pe draftul Referatului D.N.A. \u2013 S.T. Cluj.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.21.\u00a0\u00a0Astfel, judec\u0103torul de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi arat\u0103 c\u0103\u00a0\u2018<\/em><\/i>\u00ee\u015fi contureaz\u0103 suspiciunea rezonabil\u0103 de s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015fire a faptelor sus amintite prin raportare la proba\u0163iunea administrat\u0103 \u00een urm\u0103rire penal\u0103\u2019 (a se vedea pag. 77, parag. II)<\/em><\/i>,\u00a0<\/em><\/i>reproduc\u00e2nd ulterior, \u00een mod sistematic, DOAR perspectiva, interpretarea \u0219i concluziile procurorului de caz<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u0219i men\u021bioneaz\u0103 c\u0103\u00a0\u2018va re\u021bine astfel ca fiind relevante la acest moment pentru formarea suspiciunii rezonabile aspectele redate din convorbirile care se refer\u0103 la acte materiale pentru care s-a dispus punerea \u00een mi\u0219care a ac\u021biunii penale\u2019 (a se vedea pag. 77, parag. III),\u00a0<\/em><\/i>reproduc\u00e2nd ulterior ACELEA\u0218I pasaje eviden\u021biate de procurorul de caz \u00een cuprinsul referatului cu propunere de arestare preventiv\u0103 \u0219i \u00eensu\u0219indu-\u0219i \u00een integralitate concluziile D.N.A<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>.\u00a0(inclusiv prin preluarea acelora\u0219i gre\u0219eli de tehnoredactare \u2013 exemplu \u2018atesatate\u2019 \u00een loc de \u2018atestate\u2019).\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    \n

    Crt.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 953\/C\/2026 din data de 01 aprilie 2026\u00a0(redactat\u0103 la data de 08 aprilie 2026)<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    Referat D.N.A. \u2013 S.T. Cluj nr. 4697\/159\/P\/2024<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0din data de 01 aprilie 2026<\/strong><\/b><\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    1.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) \u00eentre ANTON Cristian \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru\u00a0ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0avut loc o \u00eent\u00e2lnire \u00een autoturismul acestuia dint\u00e2i, \u00een care\u00a0s-a discutat despre<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0un\u00a0posibil<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0nou mod de operare,\u00a0de unde ar reie\u015fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0c\u0103 se remit sume de bani\u00a0c\u0103tre<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0beneficiarul final pentru fraudarea examenelor,\u00a0precum<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u015fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0o amploare a mecanismului infrac\u021bional \u00een interiorul Autorit\u0103\u021bii Rutiere Rom\u00e2ne (ar exista mai multe comisii care ar permite fraudarea examenelor \u2013 unele posibil controlate de ANTON Cristian pe baza unor rela\u021bii de prietenie, altele pe baza pozi\u021biei ierarhice superioare a acestuia \u00een cadrul institu\u021biei, \u0219i altele, la un nivel mai redus, pe cont propriu (discu\u021bie redat\u0103 \u00een dosar penal nr. 92\/8\/P\/2025). (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 77, parag. I, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 77 \u2013 84)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) \u00eentre ANTON Cristian \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a avut loc o \u00eent\u00e2lnire \u00een autoturismul acestuia dint\u00e2i, \u00een care cei doi stabilesc un nou mod de operare, decel\u00e2ndu-se faptul c\u0103 se remit sume de bani la beneficiarul final pentru fraudarea examenelor, dar totodat\u0103 contur\u00e2ndu-se o amploare \u0219i mai mare a mecanismului infrac\u021bional, de aceast\u0103 dat\u0103 din interiorul Autorit\u0103\u021bii Rutiere Rom\u00e2ne, p\u00e2r\u00e2nd c\u0103 exist\u0103 mai multe comisii care ar permite fraudarea examenelor \u2013 unele posibil controlate de ANTON Cristian pe baza unor rela\u021bii de prietenie, altele controlate pe baza pozi\u021biei ierarhice superioare a lui ANTON Cristian \u00een cadrul institu\u021biei, \u0219i altele care, la un nivel mai redus, ar p\u0103rea c\u0103 ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 pe cont propriu (discu\u021bia fiind redat\u0103 \u00een cadrul dosarului penal nr. 92\/8\/P\/2025). (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 50, parag. final \u0219i pag. 51, parag. I, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 51 \u2013 58)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    2.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) La data de 19.02.2026\u00a0\u00eentr-o<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0nou\u0103 \u00eent\u00e2lnire dintre ANTON Cristian \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, \u00een fa\u021ba Ministerului Transporturilor, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru s-a urcat \u00een autoturismul numitului ANTON Cristian, unde\u00a0s-a<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0purtat urm\u0103toarea discu\u021bie (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 84, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 84 \u2013 85), respectiv de concluzionarea c\u0103 \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0Din aceste intercept\u0103ri ar reie\u015fi c\u0103 inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru\u00a0este cel care pare s\u0103 \u00eei duc\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0sumele de bani ob\u021binute ca urmare a fraud\u0103rii examenelor, \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara,\u00a0inculpatului<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0Anton Cristian spun\u00e2ndu-i\u00a0clar\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u2018hai s\u0103 ne mai \u0219i \u00eenchidem\u2019. \u2013 pag. 85, parag. II<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) La data de 19.02.2026\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>a fost surprins\u0103 o nou\u0103 \u00eent\u00e2lnire \u00eentre ANTON Cristian \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, \u00een fa\u021ba Ministerului Transporturilor, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru urc\u00e2ndu-se \u0219i de aceast\u0103 dat\u0103 \u00een autoturismul numitului ANTON Cristian, unde au purtat urm\u0103toarea discu\u021bie (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 58, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 58 \u2013 60), respectiv de concluzionarea c\u0103 \u2018(\u2026) transpare \u00een mod clar c\u0103 RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00eei aduce sumele de bani ob\u021binute ca urmare a fraud\u0103rii examenelor, \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara, inculpatului Anton Cristian spun\u00e2ndu-i clar \u2018hai s\u0103 ne mai \u0219i \u00eenchidem\u2019. \u2013 pag. 60, parag. III<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    3.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Discu\u021bia purtat\u0103 \u00eentre ANTON Cristian \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a avut ecou \u0219i \u00een autoturismul acestuia din urm\u0103, fiind surprins\u0103 o convorbire \u00eentre acesta \u0219i alte dou\u0103 persoane, c\u0103rora RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru le repro\u0219a\u00a0diverse<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0aspecte (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 85, parag. III, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 85 \u2013 87)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Discu\u021bia purtat\u0103 \u00eentre ANTON Cristian \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a avut ecou \u0219i \u00een autoturismul acestuia din urm\u0103, fiind surprins\u0103 o convorbire \u00eentre acesta \u0219i alte dou\u0103 persoane, c\u0103rora RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru le repro\u0219a aspecte legate de acea discu\u021bie (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 60, parag. IV, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 60 \u2013 62)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    4.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) \u00cen conformitate cu cele stabilite cu\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian,\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru\u00a0ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0trimis candida\u021bi pentru examenul din data de 21.02.2026 din jud. Constan\u021ba, \u00een acest sens fiind discu\u021bia din aceea\u0219i dat\u0103, cu o persoan\u0103 care \u00eei transmite componen\u021ba comisiei din jud. Constan\u021ba (\u2026)\u2019\u2013 pag. 87, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 87)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) \u00een conformitate cu cele stabilite cu inculpatul ANTON Cristian, inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a trimis candida\u021bi pentru examenul din data de 21.02.2026 din jud. Constan\u021ba (\u2026). \u00cen acest sens este \u0219i discu\u021bia din aceea\u0219i dat\u0103, cu o persoan\u0103 care \u00eei transmite componen\u021ba comisiei din jud. Constan\u021ba (\u2026)\u2019\u2013 pag. 62, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 62 \u2013 63)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    5.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0Anumite discu\u0163ii contureaz\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0implicarea\u00a0inculpatului\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00een mecanismul infrac\u021bional, dar \u0219i leg\u0103tura cu alte persoane\u00a0cercetate \u00een cauz\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u2013 19 februarie 2026, cu PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel, BOCA Angelica, dar \u0219i cu persoane interesate de promovarea frauduloas\u0103 a examenului (\u2026)\u2019.- pag. 88, parag. I, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 88 \u2013 91), respectiv de urm\u0103toarea concluzionare: \u2018(\u2026) Convorbirile sunt relevante raportat la num\u0103rul mare de intermediari cu care ar colabora inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, pe care pare c\u0103 \u00eei coordoneaz\u0103, \u0219i c\u0103rora le fixeaz\u0103 sumele de bani necesare a fi remise pentru diferite tipuri de\u00a0atesatate<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u2013 1.300 de euro CPI, 800 de euro colete \/ cisterne. (\u2026)\u2019. \u2013 pag. 91, parag. II<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) pentru a rezulta cu \u0219i mai mult\u0103 claritate implicarea inculpatului RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00een mecanismul infrac\u021bional, dar \u0219i leg\u0103tura sa cu persoanele documentate \u00een cadrul prezentei cauze, se au \u00een vedere discu\u021biile purtate de acesta, \u00een aceea\u0219i zi de 19 februarie 2026, cu PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel, BOCA Angelica, dar \u0219i cu persoane interesate de promovarea frauduloas\u0103 a examenului (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 63, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 63 \u2013 67), respectiv de urm\u0103toarea concluzionare: \u2018(\u2026) Convorbirile sunt relevante deoarece fixeaz\u0103, pe de-o parte, num\u0103rul mare de intermediari cu care colaboreaz\u0103 RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, intermediari pe care pare c\u0103 \u00eei coordoneaz\u0103, \u0219i pe de alt\u0103 parte, fixeaz\u0103 sumele de bani necesare a fi remise pentru diferite tipuri de\u00a0atesatate<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u2013 1.300 de euro CPI, 800 de euro colete \/ cisterne. (\u2026)\u2019. \u2013 pag. 68, parag. I<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    6.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) La data de 20.02.2026, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru are o discu\u021bie cu PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel, din care rezult\u0103 \u00een mod cert c\u0103 acesta a trimis candida\u021bi la examenul din jud. Mehedin\u021bi (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 91, parag. III, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 91)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) La data de 20.02.2026, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru are o discu\u021bie cu PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel, din care rezult\u0103 \u00een mod cert c\u0103 acesta a trimis candida\u021bi la examenul din jud. Mehedin\u021bi (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 68, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 68)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    7.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0Inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a fost localizat la aceea\u0219i dat\u0103 pe raza jud. Mehedin\u021bi, iar la data de 22.02.2026 pe raza mun. Timi\u0219oara, conform \u00een\u021belegerii prealabile pe care a avut-o cu inculpatul ANTON Cristian.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    La data de 23.02.2026, autoturismul utilizat de RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, cu care s-a \u0219i deplasat \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara la data de 22.02.2026 (tot conform \u00een\u021belegerii cu ANTON Cristian) a fost localizat \u00een intervalul 09:28-10:12 la sediul societ\u0103\u021bilor administrate de DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara, respectiv, CONS AUTO SRL,\u00a0aspect ce confirm\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0leg\u0103tura dintre ace\u0219tia.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103,<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0la data de 21.02.2026, c\u00e2nd se desf\u0103\u0219ura sesiune de examinare \u0219i \u00een jud. Constan\u021ba, numitul FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru a fost localizat, prin postul telefonic utilizat de acesta, pe raza mun. Constan\u021ba, confirm\u00e2ndu-se astfel planul \u00eentocmit de\u00a0inculpa\u0163ii<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru privind trimiterea unor candida\u021bi \u0219i \u00een acea loca\u021bie.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Din punerea \u00een executare a m\u0103surilor de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 autorizate \u00een spa\u021biul privat \u2013 autoturismul utilizat de c\u0103tre\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, marca BWM cu nr. de \u00eenmatriculare IF-15-UXP, cu care acesta s-a deplasat al\u0103turi de RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius la examenul din jud. Mehedin\u021bi\u00a0au fost ob\u0163inute<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u00eenregistr\u0103ri importante din care rezult\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0num\u0103rul\u00a0ridicat<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0de candida\u021bi care\u00a0ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0remis sume de bani prin RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru pentru fraudarea examenului, organizarea de la fa\u021ba locului \u0219i amploarea fenomenului (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 92, parag. I, II \u0219i III, paragrafe urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 92 \u2013 95)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a fost localizat la aceea\u0219i dat\u0103 pe raza jud. Mehedin\u021bi, iar la data de 22.02.2026 pe raza mun. Timi\u0219oara, conform \u00een\u021belegerii prealabile pe care a avut-o cu inculpatul ANTON Cristian.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    La data de 23.02.2026, autoturismul utilizat de RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, cu care s-a \u0219i deplasat \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara la data de 22.02.2026 (tot conform \u00een\u021belegerii cu ANTON Cristian) a fost localizat \u00een intervalul 09:28-10:12 la sediul societ\u0103\u021bilor administrate de DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara, respectiv, CONS AUTO SRL, ceea ce \u00eent\u0103re\u0219te \u00eenc\u0103 odat\u0103 leg\u0103tura dintre ace\u0219tia.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Nu \u00een ultimul r\u00e2nd, conform planului, la data de 21.02.2026, c\u00e2nd se desf\u0103\u0219ura sesiune de examinare \u0219i \u00een jud. Constan\u021ba, numitul FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru a fost localizat, prin postul telefonic utilizat de acesta, pe raza mun. Constan\u021ba, confirm\u00e2ndu-se astfel punerea \u00een scen\u0103 a planului \u00eentocmit de inculpa\u0163ii ANTON Cristian \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru privind trimiterea unor candida\u021bi \u0219i \u00een acea loca\u021bie.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00cen paralel, au fost ob\u021binute date de interes din punerea \u00een executare a m\u0103surilor de supraveghere tehnic\u0103 autorizate \u00een spa\u021biul privat const\u00e2nd \u00een autoturismul utilizat de c\u0103tre inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, marca BWM cu nr. de \u00eenmatriculare IF-15-UXP, cu care acesta s-a deplasat al\u0103turi de RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius la examenul din jud. Mehedin\u021bi. Discu\u021biile purtate cu acea ocazie sunt extrem de numeroase, suprinz\u00e2nd \u00een detaliu dinamica mecanismului infrac\u021bional, num\u0103rul extrem de mare de candida\u021bi care au remis sume de bani prin RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru pentru fraudarea examenului, organizarea de la fa\u021ba locului \u0219i amploarea fenomenului (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 71, parag. III \u2013 VII, paragrafe urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 71 \u2013 75)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    8.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Dincolo de discu\u021biile purtate cu intermediarii \u0219i cu candida\u021bii la examen, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a discutat \u0219i cu\u00a0numitul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru care se afla la examenul din jud. Constan\u021ba la acel moment, cu privire la problemele pe care le-a \u00eent\u00e2mpinat acolo (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 95, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 95 \u2013 99)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Dincolo de discu\u021biile purtate cu intermediarii \u0219i cu candida\u021bii la examen, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a discutat \u0219i cu numitul FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru care se afla la examenul din jud. Constan\u021ba la acel moment, cu privire la problemele pe care le-a \u00eent\u00e2mpinat acolo (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 75, parag. final, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 76 \u2013 80)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    9.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0Inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0a discutat \u0219i cu privire la incidentul din data de 20.12.2026 c\u00e2nd a g\u0103sit tehnica de \u00eenregistrare asupra martorului colaborator, ar\u0103t\u00e2nd c\u0103 era preg\u0103tit pentru oprirea \u00een trafic de c\u0103tre organele de poli\u021bie, sens \u00een care\u00a0\u0219i-ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0f\u0103cut \u2018cur\u0103\u021benie\u2019 \u00een autoutilitar\u0103, asupra lui nefiind g\u0103site sume \u00eensemnate de bani, ci doar c\u00e2teva mii de euro. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 99, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 99)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) De asemenea, acesta a discutat \u0219i cu privire la incidentul din data de 20.12.2026 c\u00e2nd a g\u0103sit tehnica de \u00eenregistrare asupra martorului colaborator, ar\u0103t\u00e2nd c\u0103 la acel moment era preg\u0103tit pentru oprirea \u00een trafic de c\u0103tre organele de poli\u021bie, sens \u00een care \u0219i-ar fi f\u0103cut \u2018cur\u0103\u021benie\u2019 \u00een autoutilitar\u0103, astfel c\u0103 asupra lui nu au fost g\u0103site sume \u00eensemnate de bani, ci doar c\u00e2teva mii de euro. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 80, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 80 \u2013 81)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    10.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) La fa\u021ba locului cu ocazia examenului, ar mai fi fost inculpatul PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel, \u015fi, probabil, numitul POPESCU Constantin \u2013 Bogdan, c\u0103ruia RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru i s-a adresat \u00een repetate r\u00e2nduri cu apelativul \u2018Bogd\u0103nele\u2019 (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 100, parag. I, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 100)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Cu privire la persoanele care s-au mai aflat la fa\u021ba locului cu ocazia examenului, s-a decelat prezen\u021ba inculpatului PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel, dar \u015fi cel mai probabil a inculpatului POPESCU Constantin \u2013 Bogdan, c\u0103ruia RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru i s-a adresat \u00een repetate r\u00e2nduri cu apelativul \u2018Bogd\u0103nele\u2019 (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 82, parag. I, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 82)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    11.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Relevant\u0103 este discu\u021bia purtat\u0103 cu\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b,\u00a0din care reiese leg\u0103tura dintre ace\u015ftia<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u015fi diversele nemul\u021bumiri pe care le au fa\u021b\u0103 de\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian,\u00a0stabilind<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0o \u00eent\u00e2lnire care urma s\u0103 aib\u0103 loc \u00een 22.02.2026 la Timi\u0219oara, cu\u00a0acesta<\/strong><\/b>, conform \u00een\u021belegerii dintre\u00a0cu inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru (\u2026)\u2019\u2013 pag. 100, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 100 \u2013 101)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Relevant\u0103 este \u0219i discu\u021bia purtat\u0103 cu inculpatul DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b, care \u00eent\u0103re\u0219te \u00eenc\u0103 odat\u0103 rela\u021bia de colaborare \u00eentre ei, dar \u015fi diversele nemul\u021bumiri pe care le au fa\u021b\u0103 de inculpatul ANTON Cristian (\u2026), fix\u00e2ndu-se totodat\u0103 \u0219i o \u00eent\u00e2lnire care urma s\u0103 aib\u0103 loc \u00een cursul zilei de 22.02.2026 la Timi\u0219oara, cu ANTON Cristian, conform \u00een\u021belegerii dintre acesta \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru (\u2026)\u2019\u2013 pag. 82, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 82 \u2013 83)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    12.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Suplimentar, imaginile camerelor de supraveghere ridicate de la Complexul West Residence din mun. Timi\u0219oara unde s-a cazat RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, la data de 22.02.2026, ora 16:22, l-au surprins pe acesta urc\u00e2nd \u00een autoturismul Renault Arkana cu nr. de \u00eenmatriculare TM-96-DNT condus de DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b, av\u00e2nd asupra sa un rucsac \u0219i o cutie.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Datele de localizare a postului telefonic utilizat de\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian \u00een acea dat\u0103 \u00een intervalul orar 17-18.30, l-au plasat pe celule apropiate de postul telefonic utilizat de\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103, din discu\u021biile din interiorul autoturismului, la data de 22.02.2026,\u00a0rezult\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0planificarea unei \u00eent\u00e2lniri cu\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 101, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 101 \u2013 102)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Suplimentar, imaginile camerelor de supraveghere ridicate de la Complexul West Residence din mun. Timi\u0219oara unde s-a cazat RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, la data de 22.02.2026, ora 16:22, l-au surprins pe acesta urc\u00e2nd \u00een autoturismul Renault Arkana cu nr. de \u00eenmatriculare TM-96-DNT condus de DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b, av\u00e2nd asupra sa un rucsac \u0219i o cutie.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (\u2026) datele de localizare a postului telefonic utilizat de inculpatul ANTON Cristian \u00een acea dat\u0103 \u0219i \u00een intervalul orar 17-18.30, l-au plasat pe celule apropiate de postul telefonic utilizat de inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103, din discu\u021biile din interiorul autoturismului, la data de 22.02.2026, se deceleaz\u0103 planificarea unei \u00eent\u00e2lniri cu inculpatul ANTON Cristian (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 84, parag. II, paragraf urmat de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 84 \u2013 85)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    13.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) La data de 28.02.2026 au avut loc activit\u0103\u021bi de supraveghere operativ\u0103, stabilindu-se c\u0103,\u00a0la acea dat\u0103 inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian s-a aflat \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara, la adresa de domiciliu, acesta desemn\u00e2nd alte persoane ca membri \u00een comisia de examinare, conform discu\u021biei purtate cu RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru care s-a aflat pe tot parcursul zilei, p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een jurul orei 15.30, la sediul societ\u0103\u021bii pe care o controleaz\u0103, de pe bd. Burebista din mun. Bucure\u0219ti, punctul de \u00eent\u00e2lnire \u0219i de colectare a sumelor de bani aferente promov\u0103rii frauduloase a examenelor.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00cen zon\u0103 au fost repera\u021bi \u0219i RADU Daniel \u2013 Mihail, dar \u0219i RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius \u0219i FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Se re\u0163ine c\u0103,<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0pe lista candida\u021bilor \u00eenscrisi la examen s-a aflat\u00a0inclusiv<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0numitul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius, parte din modul de operare pentru proba la calculator fiind cel mai probabil \u00eenscrierea pe lista de candida\u021bi a unui membru al circuitului infrac\u021bional, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t\u00a0s\u0103 existe<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0o acoperire legal\u0103, oficial\u0103, a motivului prezen\u021bei \u00een sal\u0103 (\u00een acela\u0219i mod s-a reg\u0103sit pe listele din mun. Arad din data de 01.02.2026 POP Valentin \u2013 Olimpiu,\u00a0respectiv<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b la data de 01.03.2026 tot \u00een mun. Arad).<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Dup\u0103 finalizarea examenului, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru s-a urcat la volanul autoturismului s\u0103u marca BMW cu nr. de \u00eenmatriculare IF-15-UXP \u00eempreun\u0103 cu RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius, cei doi deplas\u00e2ndu-se spre R\u00e2mnicu V\u00e2lcea, \u0219i, ulterior, spre mun. Timi\u0219oara, unde au ajuns \u00een cursul nop\u021bii. (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 102, parag. II \u2013 IV, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 102 \u2013 105)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) La data de 28.02.2026 au avut loc activit\u0103\u021bi de supraveghere operativ\u0103 (\u2026), stabilindu-se c\u0103, la la data de 28.02.2026 ANTON Cristian s-a aflat \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara, la adresa de domiciliu, confirm\u00e2ndu-se c\u0103 acesta a desemnat alte persoane ca membri \u00een comisia de examinare, conform discu\u021biei purtate cu RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru (\u2026) care s-a aflat pe tot parcursul zilei, p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een jurul orei 15.30, la sediul societ\u0103\u021bii pe care o controleaz\u0103, de pe bd. Burebista din mun. Bucure\u0219ti, punctul de \u00eent\u00e2lnire \u0219i de colectare a sumelor de bani aferente promov\u0103rii frauduloase a examenelor.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00cen zon\u0103 au fost repera\u021bi \u0219i RADU Daniel \u2013 Mihail, dar \u0219i RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius \u0219i FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Mai mult, pe lista candida\u021bilor \u00eenscrisi la examen s-a aflat \u0219i numitul RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius, aspect care conduce la ideea c\u0103 parte din modul de operare pentru proba la calculator este \u00eenscrierea pe lista de candida\u021bi a unui membru al circuitului infrac\u021bional, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t acesta s\u0103 aib\u0103 o acoperire legal\u0103, oficial\u0103, a motivului prezen\u021bei sale \u00een sala \u00een care se sus\u021bine proba la calculator (\u00een acela\u0219i mod s-a reg\u0103sit pe listele din mun. Arad din data de 01.02.2026 POP Valentin \u2013 Olimpiu \u0219i DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b la data de 01.03.2026 tot \u00een mun. Arad).<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Dup\u0103 finalizarea examenului, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru s-a urcat la volanul autoturismului s\u0103u marca BMW cu nr. de \u00eenmatriculare IF-15-UXP \u00eempreun\u0103 cu RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius, cei doi deplas\u00e2ndu-se spre R\u00e2mnicu V\u00e2lcea, \u0219i, ulterior, spre mun. Timi\u0219oara, unde au ajuns \u00een cursul nop\u021bii. (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 85, parag. I-V de la punctul 11, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 85 \u2013 89)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    14.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Discu\u021biile purtate de RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00een seara dinaintea examenului din jud. Arad sunt relevante deoarece puncteaz\u0103 aspecte esen\u021biale \u00een dinamica infrac\u021bional\u0103 \u2013 se discut\u0103\u00a0despre<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0membrii comisiilor de examinare, pe care\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian \u00eei configureaz\u0103 dup\u0103 cum consider\u0103, pentru propriile interese, aspecte cunoscute de\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Se\u00a0eviden\u0163iaz\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0starea de alert\u0103 \u00een care se afla numitul ANTON Cristian care\u00a0ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0aflat c\u0103 exist\u0103 anumite controale cu privire la examenele sus\u021binute, \u0219i solicit\u0103ri ale organelor judiciare privind predarea de imagini,\u00a0precum<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u0219i revolta lui RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru c\u0103, \u00een ciuda acestei st\u0103ri tensionate, ANTON Cristian nu dore\u0219te \u00eencetarea activit\u0103\u021bii ilicite, cel pu\u021bin pentru o perioad\u0103. Totodat\u0103, se discut\u0103 de relocarea activit\u0103\u021bii la Bucure\u0219ti, \u0219i de faptul c\u0103 la Arad\u00a0ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0un mediu propice continu\u0103rii activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale. Se\u00a0contureaz\u0103 faptul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0c\u0103 persoanele din grupul lui RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru\u00a0\u015fi-ar<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0schimba \u00eembr\u0103c\u0103mintea \u00een timpul examenelor, pentru a fi mai greu de reperat, ca o m\u0103sur\u0103 de precau\u021bie.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Judec\u0103torul observ\u0103 c\u0103, din intercept\u0103rile redate la dosar, ar reie\u015fi faptul c\u0103 inculpatul<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian\u00a0ar\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>lucra \u0219i cu alte persoane, aspect necunoscut de\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru,\u00a0cu sume<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0de 4500 de euro;\u00a0iar numitul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius\u00a0estimeaz\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0c\u00e2\u0219tigul \u00een urma examenului de la Arad, spun\u00e2nd c\u0103 \u201820 de mii tot se vor str\u00e2nge\u2019.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103, pare c\u0103 exist\u0103 o stare de<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ne\u00eencredere \u00een privin\u0163a lui \u2018Alin\u2019 (GR\u0102DINARU Alexandru \u2013 Florin) \u0219i a lui \u2018Petre\u2019 (PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel), numitul RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius \u2018sf\u0103tuindu-l\u2019 pe\u00a0inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0s\u0103 nu mai colecteze sume de bani la sediul de pe bd. Burebista.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00cen sus\u0163inerea gravit\u0103\u0163ii fenomenului infrac\u0163ional se re\u0163ine c\u0103 inculpatul<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a\u00a0precizat<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0c\u0103 cel mai mult, a avut cash suma de 160.000 de euro \u00een bancnote de 500 de euro, f\u0103r\u0103 o leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu anumite examene individualizate. (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 105, parag. final, respectiv pag. 106, parag. I \u2013 III<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Discu\u021biile purtate de RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00een seara dinaintea examenului din jud. Arad sunt relevante deoarece puncteaz\u0103 aspecte esen\u021biale \u00een dinamica infrac\u021bional\u0103. Pe de o parte se discut\u0103 de membrii comisiilor de examinare, pe care inculpatul ANTON Cristian \u00eei configureaz\u0103 dup\u0103 cum consider\u0103, pentru a-\u0219i urm\u0103ri propriile interese, aspecte cunoscute de inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (\u2026) Se vorbe\u0219te despre starea de alert\u0103 \u00een care se afla numitul ANTON Cristian care a aflat c\u0103 exist\u0103 anumite controale cu privire la examenele sus\u021binute, \u0219i solicit\u0103ri ale organelor judiciare privind predarea de imagini, precum \u0219i revolta lui RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru c\u0103, \u00een ciuda acestei st\u0103ri tensionate, ANTON Cristian nu dore\u0219te \u00eencetarea activit\u0103\u021bii ilicite, cel pu\u021bin pentru o perioad\u0103. Totodat\u0103, se discut\u0103 de relocarea activit\u0103\u021bii la Bucure\u0219ti, \u0219i de faptul c\u0103 la Arad este un mediu propice continu\u0103rii activit\u0103\u021bii infrac\u021bionale. Se creeaz\u0103 totodat\u0103 impresia c\u0103 persoanele din grupul lui RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00ee\u0219i schimb\u0103 \u00eembr\u0103c\u0103mintea \u00een timpul examenelor, pentru a fi mai greu de reperat, tot ca o m\u0103sur\u0103 de precau\u021bie.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    De asemenea, se lanseaz\u0103 ideea c\u0103 ANTON Cristian lucreaz\u0103 \u0219i cu alte persoane, aspect necunoscut de inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, pe tarife de 4500 de euro; totodat\u0103, RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius face o estimare a c\u00e2\u0219tigului pe care \u00eel vor ob\u021bine \u00een urma examenului de la Arad, spun\u00e2nd c\u0103 \u201820 de mii tot se vor str\u00e2nge\u2019.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Nu \u00een ultimul r\u00e2nd, transpar anumite animozit\u0103\u021bi \u0219i ne\u00eencrederi \u00een nucleul grupului controlat de RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru la sediul de pe bl. Burebista, RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius sf\u0103tuindu-l acesta s\u0103 nu mai colecteze sume de bani la sediul acolo, \u00een prezen\u021ba lui \u2018Alin\u2019 (GR\u0102DINARU Alexandru \u2013 Florin) \u0219i a lui \u2018Petre\u2019 (PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel).<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Adiacent, \u0219i f\u0103r\u0103 a putea fi stabilit\u0103 leg\u0103tura cu examenele, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 cel mai mult, a avut cash suma de 160.000 de euro \u00een bancnote de 500 de euro. (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 90, parag.. I \u2013 VI<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    15.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0Judec\u0103torul re\u0163ine c\u0103<\/strong><\/b>, \u00een diminea\u021ba zilei de 01.03.2026, ANTON Cristian\u00a0s-ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0deplasat la loca\u021bia de examinare din mun. Arad, cu autoturismul marca Volvo cu care circul\u0103 atunci c\u00e2nd se afl\u0103 \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara, la fa\u021ba locului fiind observa\u021bi \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u0219i RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius, dar \u0219i POP Valentin \u2013 Olimpiu.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    De\u0219i\u00a0numitul\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b nu a fost printre persoanele din exteriorul loca\u021biei de examinare,\u00a0\u015fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0acesta\u00a0ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0fost localizat pe celule \u00een zona examenului, figur\u00e2nd printre candida\u021bii \u00eenscri\u0219i la sesiunea de examinare din data de 01.03.2026 \u015fi, cel mai probabil,\u00a0fiind<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u00een majoritatea timpului \u00een sala de examinare unde se sus\u021binea<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0proba pe calculator a examenului.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    La finalul examenului,\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian a fost observat \u00een loc. de domiciliu \u2013 comuna Ghiroda, unde s-a \u00eent\u00e2lnit la brut\u0103ria din localitate cu DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b, iar ulterior, cu POP Valentin \u2013 Olimpiu \u00een fa\u021ba casei acestuia din urm\u0103, care a urcat \u00een interiorul autoturismului lui ANTON Cristian.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Ulterior, \u00een cursul serii,\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a ajuns cu autoturismul s\u0103u la imobilul unde locuie\u0219te\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian, din com. Ghiroda, str. Apele Repezi nr. 1, \u0219i a cobor\u00e2t din autoturism cu un co\u0219 de flori \u0219i cu o geant\u0103\/borset\u0103 asupra sa,\u00a0numitul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius a\u0219tept\u00e2ndu-l \u00een ma\u0219in\u0103. Dup\u0103 aproximativ 20 de minute, a ie\u0219it din imobil\u00a0plec\u00e2nd<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0spre locul de cazare \u2013 West Residence din mun. Timi\u0219oara.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00cen discu\u021bia purtat\u0103 \u00een interiorul autoturismului marca BMW cu care s-au deplasat \u00een mun. Arad RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00eei spune lui RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius, ulterior examenului din data de 01.03.2026, c\u0103 trebuie s\u0103 se deplaseze \u00een centrul mun. Timi\u0219oara pentru a schimba 14.000 de euro, RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius spun\u00e2nd c\u0103 \u2018\u0103sta nu vrea s\u0103-i duci lei\u2019, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru replic\u00e2nd c\u0103 da,\u00a0referirea fiind la inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian. Ulterior, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru discut\u0103 cu DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b pentru ca acesta din urm\u0103 s\u0103-i dea adresa lui ANTON Cristian (str. Apele Repezi din com. Ghiroda) \u0219i s\u0103-l anun\u021be c\u0103 a sosit. (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 106, parag. IV \u2013 VIII, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 106 \u2013 108)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Conform celor preconizate \u00een urma datelor existente, \u00een diminea\u021ba zilei de 01.03.2026, ANTON Cristian s-a deplasat la loca\u021bia de examinare din mun. Arad, cu autoturismul marca Volvo cu care circul\u0103 atunci c\u00e2nd se afl\u0103 \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara. La fa\u021ba locului au fost observa\u021bi \u0219i RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u0219i RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius, dar \u0219i POP Valentin \u2013 Olimpiu.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    De\u0219i numitul DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b nu a fost observat printre persoanele din exteriorul loca\u021biei de examinare, \u015fi acesta a fost localizat pe celule \u00een zona examenului, acesta figur\u00e2nd printre candida\u021bii \u00eenscri\u0219i la sesiunea de examinare din data de 01.03.2026 (\u2026) cel mai probabil, acesta afl\u00e2ndu-se \u00een majoritatea timpului \u00een sala de examinare unde se sus\u021binea proba pe calculator a examenului.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    La finalul examenului, inculpatul ANTON Cristian a fost observat \u00een loc. de domiciliu \u2013 comuna Ghiroda, unde s-a \u00eent\u00e2lnit la brut\u0103ria din localitate cu DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b, iar ulterior, cu POP Valentin \u2013 Olimpiu \u00een fa\u021ba casei acestuia din urm\u0103, POP Valentin \u2013 Olimpiu urcnd \u00een interiorul autoturismului lui ANTON Cristian.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Ulterior, \u00een cursul serii, inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a ajuns cu autoturismul s\u0103u la imobilul unde locuie\u0219te inculpatul ANTON Cristian, din com. Ghiroda, str. Apele Repezi nr. 1, \u0219i a cobor\u00e2t din autoturism cu un co\u0219 de flori \u0219i cu o geant\u0103\/borset\u0103 asupra sa, numitul RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius a\u0219tept\u00e2ndu-l \u00een ma\u0219in\u0103. Dup\u0103 un interval de aproximativ 20 de minute, acesta a ie\u0219it din imobil, \u00eendrept\u00e2ndu-se spre locul de cazare, respectiv West Residence din mun. Timi\u0219oara.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    De o importan\u021b\u0103 deosebit\u0103 este o discu\u021bie purtat\u0103 \u00een interiorul autoturismului marca BMW cu care s-au deplasat \u00een mun. Arad RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u0219i RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius, \u00een care RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00eei spune, ulterior examenului din data de 01.03.2026, c\u0103 trebuie s\u0103 se deplaseze \u00een centrul mun. Timi\u0219oara pentru a schimba 14.000 de euro, RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius spun\u00e2nd \u2018\u0103sta nu vrea s\u0103-i duci lei\u2019, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru replic\u00e2nd c\u0103 da, cei doi referindu-se la ANTON Cristian. Ulterior, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru discut\u0103 cu DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b pentru ca acesta din urm\u0103 s\u0103-i dea adresa lui ANTON Cristian (str. Apele Repezi din com. Ghiroda) \u0219i s\u0103-l anun\u021be c\u0103 a sosit. (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 90, punctul 12, respectiv pag. 91, parag. I \u0219i II, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 91 \u2013 93)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    16.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Ulterior, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a fost observat intr\u00e2nd \u00een locuin\u021ba inculpatului ANTON Cristian, unde\u00a0este posibil s\u0103 \u00eei fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0remis cel pu\u021bin suma de 14.000 de euro\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>despre care a f\u0103cut vorbire \u00een autoturism.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00cen paralel au fost surprinse alte conversa\u021bii de interes \u00een autoturismul utilizat de RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, care confirm\u0103 prezen\u021ba la examen a persoanelor\u00a0cercetate \u00een cauz\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 108, parag. II \u0219i III, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 108 \u2013 110), respectiv de urm\u0103toarea concluzionare:<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Discu\u021biile purtate la data de 01.03.2026\u00a0par s\u0103 confirme<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0rela\u021bia dintre RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u0219i DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b, \u0219i leg\u0103tura ambilor cu ANTON Cristian, DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b fiind cel care l-a anun\u021bat pe ANTON Cristian c\u0103 RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru va veni la locuin\u021ba sa.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103,\u00a0numitul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius\u00a0pare s\u0103 fie implicat<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0direct \u00een mecanismul infrac\u021bional, fiind surprins\u0103 discu\u021bia sa cu un candidat \u0219i num\u0103rarea unor sume de bani (75 \u0219i 8 \u2013 cel mai probabil 7500 de lei pentru proba teoretic\u0103 \u0219i 800 de lei pentru traseu \u2013 sume practicate \u00een cadrul grupului), dar \u0219i faptul c\u0103 acesta i-a zis candidatului c\u0103 pentru manager de transport tariful este de 1500 (de euro). (\u2026)\u2019. \u2013 pag. 110, parag. II \u0219i III<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Ulterior, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a fost observat intr\u00e2nd \u00een locuin\u021ba inculpatului ANTON Cristian, unde cel mai probabil i-a remis cel pu\u021bin suma de 14.000 de euro\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>despre care a f\u0103cut vorbire \u00een autoturism.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00cen paralel au fost surprinse alte conversa\u021bii de interes \u00een autoturismul utilizat de RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, care confirm\u0103 prezen\u021ba la examen a persoanelor de interes (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 93, parag. II \u0219i III, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 93 \u2013 96), respectiv de urm\u0103toarea concluzionare:<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Discu\u021biile purtate la data de 01.03.2026 \u00eent\u0103resc rela\u021bia dintre RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u0219i DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b, \u0219i (\u2026) leg\u0103tura ambilor cu ANTON Cristian, DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b fiind cel care l-a anun\u021bat pe ANTON Cristian c\u0103 RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru va veni la locuin\u021ba sa.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103, numitul RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius se implic\u0103 direct \u00een mecanismul infrac\u021bional, fiind surprins\u0103 discu\u021bia sa cu un candidat \u0219i num\u0103rarea unor sume de bani (75 \u0219i 8 \u2013 cel mai probabil 7500 de lei pentru proba teoretic\u0103 \u0219i 800 de lei pentru traseu \u2013 sume practicate \u00een cadrul grupului), dar \u0219i faptul c\u0103 acesta i-a zis candidatului c\u0103 pentru manager de transport tariful este de 1500 (de euro). (\u2026)\u2019. \u2013 pag. 96, parag. II \u0219i III<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    17.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0La acest moment<\/strong><\/b>, a fost introdus investigatorul sub acoperire MAVRICHE Adrian, care a luat leg\u0103tura cu\u00a0inculpatul\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, \u00een vederea promov\u0103rii examenului privind ob\u021binerea atestatului CPI.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Astfel, \u00een jurul orei 06.30, investigatorul sub acoperire a fost chemat la sediul societ\u0103\u021bii Investasig SRL controlat\u0103 de\u00a0inculpat<\/strong><\/b>, loca\u021bie unde se aflau mai mul\u021bi candida\u021bi (aproximativ 20 din observa\u021biile investigatorului), dar \u0219i RADU Daniel \u2013 Mihail, RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius, FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru \u0219i GR\u0102DINARU Alexandru \u2013 Florin,\u00a0precum<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u0219i alte dou\u0103 persoane neidentificate p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een prezent.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru le-a spus candida\u021bilor c\u0103 examenul este compus din dou\u0103 probe, una \u2018calculator\u2019 \u0219i una scris\u0103, suger\u00e2nd c\u0103 testul la calculator va fi rezolvat de altcineva. Investigatorul sub acoperire a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 nu\u00a0\u015ftie<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0felul \u00een care a promovat proba la calculator.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Ulterior, RADU Daniel \u2013 Mihail le-a \u021binut un instructaj cu privire la desf\u0103\u0219urarea examenului scris, comunic\u00e2ndu-le s\u0103 transcrie exact r\u0103spunsurile primite pe foaie \u0219i s\u0103 nu discute cu nicio persoan\u0103 despre modalitatea \u00een care au sus\u021binut examenul.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Investigatorul sub acoperire l-a observat pe\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00eencas\u00e2nd o sum\u0103 de bani \u00een euro de la un candidat, \u0219i apoi solicit\u00e2nd suma de 1100 de euro de la un altul, sum\u0103 care i-a fost remis\u0103 \u00een lire sterline.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru i-a solicitat \u0219i investigatorului suma de 1100 de euro, iar apoi a dirijat persoanele aflate la fa\u021ba locului spre loca\u021bia de examen de pe pe bd. Metalurgiei- sala 4.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Intr\u00e2nd \u00een sala 4, investigatorul sub acoperire i-a \u00eenm\u00e2nat buletinul membrului comisiei de examinare \u2013 ANTON Cristian, observ\u00e2ndu-l anterior, al\u0103turi de el, \u0219i pe FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru, cei doi discut\u00e2nd \u00een \u0219oapt\u0103.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Ulterior,\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian i-a \u00eenm\u00e2nat investigatorului sub acoperire dou\u0103 file A4, conform celor ar\u0103tate de RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00een cadrul instructajului \u2013 una alb\u0103 unde trebuiau completate datele de identificare \u0219i scris\u0103 rezolvarea subiectelor, iar o alta, care cuprindea rezolvarea probei scrise.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00cen timp ce investigatorul transcria subiectele, a observat \u0219i alte persoane \u00een jurul s\u0103u care procedau\u00a0similar<\/strong><\/b>, deci care primiseser\u0103 la r\u00e2ndul lor, subiectele rezolvate. \u00cen acela\u0219i timp, l-a observat pe FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru care mai supraveghea candida\u021bii \u00een sala de examinare \u0219i mai discuta cu ANTON Cristian.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    La finalizarea transcrierii r\u0103spunsurilor, investigatorul a predat subiectele \u0219i a p\u0103r\u0103sit sala, iar ulterior, verific\u00e2nd baza de date A.R.R, a constatat c\u0103 a fost declarat admis la examenul privind ob\u021binerea atestatului CPI. (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 110, parag. IV \u2013 IX \u0219i pag. 111, parag. I \u0219i II, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 111 \u2013 112)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Cu ocazia examenului de la aceast\u0103 dat\u0103, \u00een cauz\u0103 a fost introdus investigatorul sub acoperire MAVRICHE Adrian, care a luat leg\u0103tura cu inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, \u00een vederea promov\u0103rii examenului privind ob\u021binerea atestatului CPI.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Astfel, \u00een jurul orei 06.30, investigatorul sub acoperire a fost chemat de acesta la sediul societ\u0103\u021bii Investasig SRL controlat\u0103 de RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru, loca\u021bie unde se aflau mai mul\u021bi candida\u021bi (aproximativ 20 din observa\u021biile investigatorului), dar \u0219i RADU Daniel \u2013 Mihail, RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius, FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru \u0219i GR\u0102DINARU Alexandru \u2013 Florin, dar \u0219i alte dou\u0103 persoane neidentificate p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een prezent.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru le-a spus candida\u021bilor c\u0103 examenul este compus din dou\u0103 probe, una \u2018calculator\u2019 \u0219i una scris\u0103, suger\u00e2ndu-le c\u0103 testul la calculator va fi rezolvat de altcineva. Investigatorul sub acoperire a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 nu cunoa\u0219te felul \u00een care a promovat proba la calculator.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Ulterior, RADU Daniel \u2013 Mihail le-a \u021binut un instructaj cu privire la desf\u0103\u0219urarea examenului scris, comunic\u00e2ndu-le s\u0103 transcrie exact r\u0103spunsurile primite pe foaie \u0219i s\u0103 nu discute cu nicio persoan\u0103 despre modalitatea \u00een care au sus\u021binut examenul.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (\u2026) investigatorul sub acoperire l-a observat pe inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00eencas\u00e2nd o sum\u0103 de bani \u00een euro de la un candidat, \u0219i apoi solicit\u00e2nd suma de 1100 de euro de la un altul, sum\u0103 care i-a fost remis\u0103 \u00een lire sterline.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru i-a solicitat \u0219i investigatorului suma de 1100 de euro, iar apoi a dirijat persoanele aflate la fa\u021ba locului spre loca\u021bia de examen de pe pe bd. Metalurgiei- sala 4.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Intr\u00e2nd \u00een sala 4, investigatorul sub acoperire i-a \u00eenm\u00e2nat buletinul membrului comisiei de examinare \u2013 ANTON Cristian, observ\u00e2ndu-l anterior, al\u0103turi de el, \u0219i pe FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru, cei doi discut\u00e2nd \u00een \u0219oapt\u0103.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Ulterior, inculpatul ANTON Cristian i-a \u00eenm\u00e2nat investigatorului sub acoperire dou\u0103 file A4, conform celor ar\u0103tate de RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u00een cadrul instructajului \u2013 una alb\u0103 unde trebuiau completate datele de identificare \u0219i scris\u0103 rezolvarea subiectelor, iar o alta, care cuprindea rezolvarea probei scrise.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00cen timp ce investigatorul transcria subiectele, acesta a observat \u0219i alte persoane \u00een jurul s\u0103u care procedau de aceea\u0219i manier\u0103, deci care primiseser\u0103 la r\u00e2ndul lor, subiectele rezolvate. \u00cen acela\u0219i timp, l-a observat pe FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru care mai supraveghea candida\u021bii \u00een sala de examinare \u0219i mai discuta cu ANTON Cristian.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    La finalizarea transcrierii r\u0103spunsurilor, investigatorul a predat subiectele \u0219i a p\u0103r\u0103sit sala, iar ulterior, verific\u00e2nd baza de date A.R.R, a constatat c\u0103 a fost declarat admis la examenul privind ob\u021binerea atestatului CPI. (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 96, punctul 13, respectiv pag. 97 parag. I \u2013 V, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 97 \u2013 99)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    18.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) \u00cen sala de examinare, investigatorul sub acoperire a primit foaia cu r\u0103spunsurile de la\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian, pe care le-a copiat, observ\u00e2ndu-se c\u0103 prima foaie primit\u0103 (extras\u0103 din cuprinsul teancului), con\u021binea un text tehnoredactat (\u00een concret, aspecte de ordin teoretic din domeniul transporturilor rutiere), iar cea de-a doua foaie primit\u0103, care a mascat-o pe prima, a fost foaia de examen pentru proba scris\u0103 (\u2018Studiu de Caz Conduc\u0103tor Auto CPI Transport Marf\u0103\u2019), dar care nu con\u021binea nicio \u00eentrebare \/ cerin\u021b\u0103.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00cen paralel, cu ocazia aceluia\u0219i examen, a fost surprins\u0103 o convorbire telefonic\u0103 \u00eentre PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel (zis \u2018Petre Blondu\u2019) \u0219i persoana identificat\u0103 ca fiind ZONTEA Ovidiu \u2013 candidat la sesiunea de examinare aceea\u0219i dat\u0103, persoana \u00een cauz\u0103 spun\u00e2ndu-i c\u0103 nu a copiat bine r\u0103spunsurile \u0219i a p\u0103r\u0103sit sala. (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 113, parag. II \u0219i III, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 113 \u2013 115)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) \u00cen sala de examinare, investigatorul sub acoperire a primit foaia cu r\u0103spunsurile de la inculpatul ANTON Cristian, pe care le-a copiat, observ\u00e2ndu-se c\u0103 prima foaie primit\u0103 (extras\u0103 din cuprinsul teancului), con\u021binea un text tehnoredactat (\u00een concret, aspecte de ordin teoretic din domeniul transporturilor rutiere), iar cea de-a doua foaie primit\u0103, care practic a mascat-o pe prima, a fost foaia de examen pentru proba scris\u0103 (\u2018Studiu de Caz Conduc\u0103tor Auto CPI Transport Marf\u0103\u2019), dar care nu con\u021binea nicio \u00eentrebare \/ cerin\u021b\u0103.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00cen paralel, cu ocazia aceluia\u0219i examen, a fost surprins\u0103 o convorbire telefonic\u0103 \u00eentre PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel (zis \u2018Petre Blondu\u2019) \u0219i persoana identificat\u0103 ca fiind ZONTEA Ovidiu \u2013 candidat la sesiunea de examinare aceea\u0219i dat\u0103, persoana \u00een cauz\u0103 spun\u00e2ndu-i c\u0103 nu a copiat bine r\u0103spunsurile \u0219i a p\u0103r\u0103sit sala. (\u2026)\u2019- pag. 100, parag. II \u0219i III, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 100 \u2013 102)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    19.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Aceast\u0103 discu\u021bie confirm\u0103 suplimentar modul de operare din sala de examen \u0219i fraudarea examenelor de c\u0103tre persoanele\u00a0aflate<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu\u00a0inculpatul\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Judec\u0103torul re\u0163ine c\u0103, la finalul zilei, dup\u0103 examen, inculpatul\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>ANTON Cristian s-a deplasat \u00een zona societ\u0103\u021bii Investasig de pe bd. Burebista, unde a fost a\u0219teptat de\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru cu o pung\u0103 cu inscrip\u021bia \u2018Boss\u2019, acesta urc\u00e2nd \u00een autoturismul marca Dacia Duster condus de ANTON Cristian \u0219i purt\u00e2nd urm\u0103toarea discu\u021bie (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 115, parag. II \u0219i III, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 115 \u2013 118)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Aceast\u0103 discu\u021bie confirm\u0103 suplimentar modul de operare din sala de examen \u0219i fraudarea examenelor de c\u0103tre persoanele aflate \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Nu \u00een ultimul r\u00e2nd, extrem de relevant este momentul final al zilei c\u00e2nd, la finalizarea examenului, ANTON Cristian s-a deplasat \u00een zona societ\u0103\u021bii Investasig de pe bd. Burebista, unde a fost a\u0219teptat de inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru cu o pung\u0103 cu inscrip\u021bia \u2018Boss\u2019, acesta urc\u00e2nd \u00een autoturismul marca Dacia Duster condus de ANTON Cristian \u0219i purt\u00e2nd urm\u0103toarea discu\u021bie (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 102, parag. II \u0219i III, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 102 \u2013 107)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    20.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0Judec\u0103torul observ\u0103 c\u0103 aceast\u0103 convorbire contureaz\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u00eentreg mecanismul infrac\u021bional\u00a0\u015fi, totodat\u0103, a contribuit la stabilirea<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0sumelor\u00a0presupus<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0remise de c\u0103tre\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru\u00a0inculpatului<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian \u00een urma examenului din data de 07.03.2026,\u00a0corectitudinea calculului efectiv nef\u0103c\u00e2nd obiectul analizei \u00een concrete \u00een prezenta procedur\u0103<\/strong><\/b>.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    La data de 17.03.2026, a existat o discu\u0163ie \u00een continuare, c\u00e2nd RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru s-a \u00eent\u00e2lnit cu ANTON Cristian \u00een autoturismul marca Dacia Duster, cei doi desocotindu-se cu privire la examenele trecute, a\u0219a cum au r\u0103mas \u00een\u021bele\u0219i la data de 07.03.2026 (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 119, parag. I \u0219i II, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 119)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Discu\u021bia este relevant\u0103 nu doar pentru c\u0103 prezint\u0103 de o manier\u0103 coerent\u0103 \u00eentreg mecanismul infrac\u021bional, dar \u0219i pentru c\u0103 s-au putut stabili sumele remise de c\u0103tre inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru inculpatului ANTON Cristian \u00een urma examenului din data de 07.03.2026, fiind a\u0219adar f\u0103r\u0103 dubii c\u0103 aspectele ini\u021biale s-au confirmat.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Mai mult, discu\u0163ia a avut o continuare la data de 17.03.2026, c\u00e2nd RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru s-a \u00eent\u00e2lnit cu ANTON Cristian \u00een autoturismul marca Dacia Duster, cei doi desocotindu-se cu privire la examenele trecute, a\u0219a cum au r\u0103mas \u00een\u021bele\u0219i la data de 07.03.2026 (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 107, parag. II \u0219i III, paragrafe urmate de redarea unor ample convorbiri (pag. 107 \u0219i 108)<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    \n

    21.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) sumele de bani datorate\u00a0inculpatului<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian sunt explicite: 31.000 la \u2018Bucure\u0219tiu \u0103la\u2019, 8600 la Arad, 22.000 la Mehedin\u021bi, cu men\u021biunea c\u0103 \u2018ultima dat\u0103 la Bucure\u0219ti\u2019 (deci la 07.03.2026), inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru i-a remis suma de 30.000 de euro (trebuia s\u0103 \u00eei dea 26.000 \u0219i i-a dat 30.000), banii remi\u0219i pentru ultimul examen din Mun. Bucure\u0219ti fiind diferi\u021bi fa\u021b\u0103 de sumele de bani despre care s-a f\u0103cut vorbire \u00een cadrul discu\u021biei.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Din ansamblul discu\u021biei purtate ar rezulta c\u0103, la momentul 17.03.2026,\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru i-ar fi remis deja suma de 34.000 de euro lui ANTON Cristian, \u0219i mai trebuia s\u0103 \u00eei remit\u0103 suma de 28.000 de euro, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru ar\u0103t\u00e2nd c\u0103, din acea sum\u0103, \u20185.000 sunt la Robi\u2019, \u0219i diferen\u021ba i-o va aduce el personal lui ANTON Cristian. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 120, parag. II \u0219i III<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) sumele de bani datorate inculpatului ANTON Cristian, astfel: 31.000 la \u2018Bucure\u0219tiu \u0103la\u2019, 8600 la Arad, 22.000 la Mehedin\u021bi, cu men\u021biunea c\u0103 \u2018ultima dat\u0103 la Bucure\u0219ti\u2019 (deci la 07.03.2026), RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru i-a remis suma de 30.000 de euro (trebuia s\u0103 \u00eei dea 26.000 \u0219i i-a dat 30.000). Din formularea folosit\u0103 se deceleaz\u0103 c\u0103 banii remi\u0219i pentru ultimul examen din Mun. Bucure\u0219ti fiind diferi\u021bi fa\u021b\u0103 de sumele de bani despre care s-a f\u0103cut vorbire \u00een cadrul discu\u021biei.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Din ansamblul discu\u021biei purtate ar rezulta c\u0103, la momentul 17.03.2026, inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru i-ar fi remis deja suma de 34.000 de euro lui ANTON Cristian, \u0219i c\u0103 mai trebuia s\u0103 \u00eei remit\u0103 suma de 28.000 de euro, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru ar\u0103t\u00e2nd c\u0103, din acea sum\u0103, \u20185.000 sunt la Robi\u2019, \u0219i diferen\u021ba i-o va aduce el personal lui ANTON Cristian. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 108, parag. II \u0219i III<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    22.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Astfel, exist\u0103 o suspiciune rezonabil\u0103 c\u0103, pentru aceste examene \u2013 21.02.2026 din jud. Mehedin\u021bi, 28.02.2026 din mun. Bucure\u0219ti, 01.03.2026 din jud. Arad, suma care\u00a0i-ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0parvenit\u00a0inculpatului<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian, conform propriilor calcule din autoturism,\u00a0ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0fost de 54 800 de euro, din care inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru\u00a0i-ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0remis deja suma de 34.000 de euro, urm\u00e2nd s\u0103 \u00eei mai remit\u0103 suma de 20.800 de euro. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 120, parag. IV<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Prin urmare, cu privire la aceste examene \u2013 cel mai probabil 21.02.2026 din jud. Mehedin\u021bi, 28.02.2026 din mun. Bucure\u0219ti, 01.03.2026 din jud. Arad, suma care i-ar fi parvenit inculpatului ANTON Cristian, conform propriilor calcule din autoturism, ar fi fost de 54.800 de euro, din care inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru i-ar fi remis deja suma de 34.000 de euro, urm\u00e2nd s\u0103 \u00eei mai remit\u0103 suma de 20.800 de euro. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 108, parag. IV<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    23.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0\u00cen egal\u0103 m\u0103sur\u0103, judec\u0103torul consider\u0103 c\u0103, din discu\u0163ii reiese faptul c\u0103<\/strong><\/b>, la data de 01.03.2026,\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru\u00a0ar fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0remis\u00a0inculpatului<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian cel pu\u021bin suma de 14.000 de euro\u00a0(suma schimbat\u0103 din lei)<\/strong><\/b>, iar suma de 8600 de euro despre care s-a vorbit la data de 17.03.2026 este cel mai probabil un rest, dup\u0103 incidentul din data de 20.12.2026 nemaip\u0103str\u00e2ndu-se tiparul privind remiterea banilor \u00een aceea\u0219i zi cu examenele.\u00a0Este posibil ca<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0acei minim 14.000 de euro\u00a0s\u0103 fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0fost, \u00een realitate, 30.000 de euro,\u00a0deoarece\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>la examene candida\u021bii\u00a0par s\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0aduc\u0103 sumele de bani \u0219i \u00een moneda euro; iar cei 14.000 de euro, converti\u021bi din lei,\u00a0ar<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0reprezenta doar sumele primite \u00een\u00a0lei<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0cu ocazia examenului. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 120, parag. V<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Cu toate acestea, este cert\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>c\u0103, la data de 01.03.2026, inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru i-a remis inculpatului ANTON Cristian acestuia cel pu\u021bin suma de 14.000 de euro (suma schimbat\u0103 din lei), de unde se deduce c\u0103 suma de 8600 de euro despre care a f\u0103cut vorbire la data de 17.03.2026 este cel mai probabil un rest din suma total\u0103, dup\u0103 incidentul din data de 20.12.2026 nemaip\u0103str\u00e2ndu-se tiparul privind remiterea banilor \u00een aceea\u0219i zi cu examenele. Mai mult dec\u00e2t at\u00e2t, din discu\u021bie rezult\u0103 c\u0103 acei minim 14.000 de euro au fost, \u00een realitate, 30.000 de euro, ceea ce este plauzibil, dat find c\u0103\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>la examene candida\u021bii aduc sumele de bani \u0219i \u00een moneda euro; a\u0219adar, cei 14.000 de euro, converti\u021bi din lei, reprezent\u0103 doar sumele primite \u00een moneda leu cu ocazia examenului. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 108, parag. final, pag. 109, parag. I<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    24.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0Observ\u00e2nd c\u0103 inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian i-a cerut inculpatului RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u2018s\u0103 se mai \u00eenchid\u0103\u2019, pare c\u0103 banii colecta\u021bi\u00a0de la examene<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0sunt p\u0103stra\u021bi\u00a0o perioad\u0103 de timp<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0de c\u0103tre RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u0219i\u00a0doar ulterior<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0sunt du\u0219i la ANTON Cristian, c\u00e2nd situa\u021bia o permite, \u0219i nu consecutiv fiec\u0103rui examen. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 120, parag. VI<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) De altfel, ANTON Cristian i-a \u0219i cerut inculpatului RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u2018s\u0103 se mai \u00eenchid\u0103\u2019, de unde rezult\u0103 aceea\u0219i concluzie, respectiv c\u0103 banii colecta\u021bi sunt p\u0103stra\u021bi o perioad\u0103 de timp de c\u0103tre RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru \u0219i doar ulterior c\u0103 sunt du\u0219i la ANTON Cristian atunci c\u00e2nd situa\u021bia o permite, \u0219i nu consecutiv fiec\u0103rui examen. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 109, parag. II<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    25.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0Judec\u0103torul de drepturi \u015fi libert\u0103\u0163i re\u0163ine faptul c\u0103, \u00een urma<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0perchezi\u021biilor domiciliare desf\u0103\u0219urate \u00een cursul zilei de 31.03.2026, s-au identificat la locuin\u021bele inculpatului ANTON Cristian din mun. Bucure\u0219ti \u0219i din jud. Timi\u0219 numeroase sume de bani, \u00een valoare total\u0103 de aproximativ 500.000 de euro.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103, la\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a fost identificat\u0103 suma aproximativ\u0103 de 25.000 de euro \u0219i dou\u0103 ceasuri de lux marca Cartier, iar la fratele acestuia, inculpatul RADU Daniel \u2013 Mihail, suma de aproximativ 30.000 de euro.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    De asemenea, au fost identificate sume de bani, prinse \u00een elastice, cu men\u021biuni de tipul,\u2019Roby\u2019, \u00een cuantum de 17.500 lei (posibil DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b) la locuin\u021ba inculpatului POPESCU Constantin \u2013 Bogdan, unde a fost identificat\u0103 suplimentar \u0219i suma total\u0103 de peste 58.000 de euro.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    La inculpatul FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru a fost g\u0103sit\u0103 suma de aproximativ 13.000 de euro.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103, \u00een autoturismul lui PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel a fost identificat\u0103 o sum\u0103 de bani prins\u0103 \u00een elastic, cu o h\u00e2rtie alb\u0103 cu men\u021biunile olografe \u2018Petre \u2013 6 lungi 2 scur\u021bi, 10.100 ron, 2800 euro, total 4800 euro\u2019, sume de bani posibil destinate fraud\u0103rii examenelor,\u00a0raportat la<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0terminologia \u2018scur\u021bi\/ lungi\u2019\u00a0utilizat\u0103 \u00een convorbirile redate la dosar<\/strong><\/b>.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    F\u0103r\u0103 a stabili cu titlu definitiv provenien\u0163a acestor sume de bani, judec\u0103torul nu poate dec\u00e2t s\u0103 concluzioneze \u00een sensul c\u0103 sumele mari de bani g\u0103site \u00een numerar la persoanele cercetate \u00een cauz\u0103, nu se pot reg\u0103si \u00een economii raportate la venituri licite aferente profesiilor pe care inculpa\u0163ii le desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 120, parag. VII \u2013 XII<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Suplimentar, cu ocazia perchezi\u021biilor domiciliare desf\u0103\u0219urate \u00een cursul zilei de 31.03.2026, s-au identificat la locuin\u021bele inculpatului ANTON Cristian din mun. Bucure\u0219ti \u0219i din jud. Timi\u0219 numeroase sume de bani, \u00een valoare total\u0103 de aproximativ 500.000 de euro.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103, la inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a fost identificat\u0103 suma aproximativ\u0103 de 25.000 de euro \u0219i dou\u0103 ceasuri de lux marca Cartier, iar la fratele acestuia, inculpatul RADU Daniel \u2013 Mihail, suma de aproximativ 30.000 de euro.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    De asemenea, au fost identificate sume de bani, prinse \u00een elastice, cu men\u021biuni de tipul,\u2019Roby\u2019, \u00een cuantum de 17.500 lei (posibil DR\u0102GHIA<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b) la locuin\u021ba inculpatului POPESCU Constantin \u2013 Bogdan, unde a fost identificat\u0103 suplimentar \u0219i suma total\u0103 de peste 58.000 de euro.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u0218i la inculpatul FRIGUR\u0102 Dumitru \u2013 Alexandru a fost g\u0103sit\u0103 suma de aproximativ 13.000 de euro.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103, \u00een autoturismul lui PARASCHIV Petric\u0103 \u2013 Marinel a fost identificat\u0103 o sum\u0103 de bani prins\u0103 \u00een elastic, cu o h\u00e2rtie alb\u0103 cu men\u021biunile olografe \u2018Petre \u2013 6 lungi 2 scur\u021bi, 10.100 ron, 2800 euro, total 4800 euro\u2019, de unde rezult\u0103 clar c\u0103 acelea erau sume de bani pentru fraudarea examenelor, terminologia \u2018scur\u021bi\/ lungi\u2019 fiind tipic\u0103 limbajului \u00een domeniu.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    A\u0219adar, sumele de bani g\u0103site \u00een valoare at\u00e2t de mare la to\u021bi membrii grupului, persoane care, de altfel, nu ar putea justifica \u00een mod rezonabil aceste sume raportat la veniturile lor licite \u0219i la profesiile pe care le desf\u0103\u0219oar\u0103, confirm\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 odat\u0103 c\u0103 aspectele cercetate s-au confirmat. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 115, parag. III \u2013 VII<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    26.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) ulterior examenului din data de 01.03.2026, la aceea\u0219i dat\u0103,\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a schimbat suma de 14.000 de euro \u00eentr-un loc din mun. Timi\u0219oara unde nu\u00a0era<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0nevoie de legitimarea cu cartea de identitate, \u00een discu\u0163ia cu RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius privind convertirea echivalentului \u00een lei a sumei,\u00a0acesta preciz\u00e2nd c\u0103 inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian nu vrea sume de bani \u00een lei.\u00a0Ulterior<\/strong><\/b>, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a luat leg\u0103tura cu DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b, care i-a intermediat vizita la locuin\u021ba lui ANTON Cristian din mun. Timi\u0219oara, activit\u0103\u021bile de supraveghere operativ\u0103\u00a0confirm\u00e2nd \u00eent\u00e2lnirea<\/strong><\/b>.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>, discu\u021bia din data de 17.03.2026 cu privire la examenul din mun. Arad se refer\u0103 la suma de 30.000 de euro,\u00a0iar<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0la data de 07.03.2026, dup\u0103 examenul din mun. Bucure\u0219ti,\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a fost surprins a\u0219tept\u00e2ndu-l pe\u00a0inculpatul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0ANTON Cristian cu o plas\u0103 \u00een m\u00e2n\u0103, \u00een autoturismul condus de acesta discut\u00e2nd c\u0103,\u2019\u00eei las\u0103 \u0103\u0219tia de azi plus cinci mii\u2019, iar ulterior zic\u00e2nd \u2018dou\u0103jdou\u0103 ori dou\u0103 mii patru sute plus cin\u0219pe mii\u2019 \u2013\u00a0la acea dat\u0103 inculpatul ANTON Cristian primind cel mai probabil suma de 30.000 de euro<\/strong><\/b>.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Restul datorat pentru examenele din Bucure\u0219ti, Arad \u0219i Mehedin\u021bi\u00a0ar fi\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>de 20.800 (din 54.800), bani pe care urma s\u0103 \u00eei aduc\u0103 RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru la ANTON Cristian \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara, suma de 5000 de euro din acest rest\u00a0fiind<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0la \u2018Robi\u2019 (DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b). \u2013 pag. 120, parag. final, respectiv pag. 121, parag. I \u0219i II<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) \u2013 ulterior examenului din data de 01.03.2026, la aceea\u0219i dat\u0103, inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a schimbat suma de 14.000 de euro \u00eentr-un loc din mun. Timi\u0219oara unde nu este nevoie de legitimarea cu cartea de identitate; \u00een discu\u0163ia cu RACHIERU Nicolae \u2013 Marius privind convertirea echivalentului \u00een lei a sumei, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 ANTON Cristian nu vrea sume de bani \u00een lei; imediat dup\u0103, \u00een aceea\u0219i sear\u0103, RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a luat leg\u0103tura cu DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b, care i-a intermediat vizita la locuin\u021ba lui ANTON Cristian din mun. Timi\u0219oara, activit\u0103\u021bile de supraveghere operativ\u0103 desf\u0103\u0219urate la acea dat\u0103 plas\u00e2ndu-l pe RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru la locuin\u021ba lui ANTON Cristian.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Totodat\u0103, discu\u021bia din data de 17.03.2026 cu privire la examenul din mun. Arad se refer\u0103 la suma de 30.000 de euro; la data de 07.03.2026, dup\u0103 examenul din mun. Bucure\u0219ti, inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru a fost surprins a\u0219tept\u00e2ndu-l pe inculpatul ANTON Cristian cu o plas\u0103 \u00een m\u00e2n\u0103, acesta intr\u00e2nd \u00een autoturismul condus de ANTON Cristian \u0219i discut\u00e2nd c\u0103,\u2019\u00eei las\u0103 \u0103\u0219tia de azi plus cinci mii\u2019, iar ulterior zic\u00e2nd \u2018dou\u0103jdou\u0103 ori dou\u0103 mii patru sute plus cin\u0219pe mii\u2019, stabilindu-se ulterior, din convorbirea din data de 17.03.2026, c\u0103 la acea dat\u0103 ANTON Cristian a primit suma de 30.000 de euro;<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (\u2026) restul datorat pentru examenele din Bucure\u0219ti, Arad \u0219i Mehedin\u021bi este de 20.800 (din 54.800), bani pe care urma s\u0103 \u00eei aduc\u0103 RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru la ANTON Cristian \u00een mun. Timi\u0219oara, suma de 5000 de euro din acest rest afl\u00e2ndu-se la \u2018Robi\u2019 (DR\u0102GHIA DONATI Robert \u2013 Ionu\u021b). \u2013 pag. 109, parag. final, respectiv pag. 121, parag. III<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.38.\u00a0\u00a0Deopotriv\u0103 \u00een dezvoltarea acestei critici\u00a0(\u0219i \u00een ceea ce prive\u0219te punctul\u00a0Situa\u021bia inculpatului ANTON Cristian<\/strong><\/b>), ar\u0103t c\u0103\u00a0inclusiv perspectiva \u0219i concluziile<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0NU apar\u021bin Tribunalului Cluj, ci tot EXCLUSIV D.N.A. \u2013 S.T. Cluj<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(fiind copiate \u0219i \u00eensu\u0219ite \u00een integralitate de c\u0103tre judec\u0103torul de drepturi \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bi, F\u0102R\u0102 o analiz\u0103 direct\u0103 \u0219i personal\u0103),\u00a0<\/em><\/i>dup\u0103 cum probez \u00een cele ce urmeaz\u0103:<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    \n

    Crt.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u00cencheiere penal\u0103 nr. 953\/C\/2026 din data de 01 aprilie 2026\u00a0(redactat\u0103 la data de 08 aprilie 2026)<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    Referat D.N.A. \u2013 S.T. Cluj nr. 4697\/159\/P\/2024<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0din data de 01 aprilie 2026<\/strong><\/b><\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    1.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) faptele\u00a0presupus<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015fite\u00a0fiind<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0de o gravitate semnificativ\u0103,\u00a0raportat la calitatea sa<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0de director general al Autorit\u0103\u021bii Rutiere Rom\u00e2ne, institu\u021bie public\u0103 aflat\u0103 \u00een subordinea Ministerului Transporturilor, \u00een cadrul c\u0103reia se sus\u021bin examenele privind ob\u021binerea atestatelor profesionale \u00een domeniu. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 123, parag. II<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) faptele presupus s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015fite sunt de o<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    gravitate semnificativ\u0103, mai ales fiind realziate din postura de director general al Autorit\u0103\u021bii Rutiere Rom\u00e2ne, institu\u021bie public\u0103 aflat\u0103 \u00een subordinea Ministerului Transporturilor, \u00een cadrul c\u0103reia se sus\u021bin examenele privind ob\u021binerea atestatelor profesionale \u00een domeniu. (\u2026) \u2013 pag. 122, sec\u021biunea A, parag. IV<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    1.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0Judec\u0103torul observ\u0103 c\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0inculpatul ANTON Cristian\u00a0pare s\u0103 se fi<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0folosit de func\u021bia sa \u0219i de atribu\u021biile sale de serviciu care deriv\u0103 din calitatea de examinator \u2013 membru \u00een comisia de examinare, pentru a dezvolta un mecanism infrac\u021bional amplu, \u00eentins \u0219i perfec\u021bionat pe o perioad\u0103 semnificativ\u0103 de timp, prin care a ajuns s\u0103 controleze mai multe loca\u021bii de examinare, at\u00e2t direct, c\u00e2t \u0219i indirect, prin al\u021bi membri de comisie agrea\u021bi, \u00een scopul fraud\u0103rii examenelor, \u00een schimbul remiterii unor sume de bani cu titlu de mit\u0103. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 123, parag. III<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) inculpatul s-a folosit de func\u021bia sa de\u021binut\u0103 \u00een cadrul Autorit\u0103\u021bii Rutiere Rom\u00e2ne \u0219i de atribu\u021biile sale de serviciu care deriv\u0103 din calitatea de examinator \u2013 membru \u00een comisia de examinare de la aceste examene, pentru a dezvolta un mecanism infrac\u021bional amplu, \u00eentins \u0219i perfec\u021bionat pe o perioad\u0103 semnificativ\u0103 de timp, prin care acesta a ajuns s\u0103 controleze mai multe loca\u021bii de examinare, at\u00e2t direct, c\u00e2t \u0219i indirect, prin al\u021bi membri de comisie agrea\u021bi de acesta, \u00een scopul fraud\u0103rii examenelor, \u00een schimbul remiterii unor sume de bani cu titlu de mit\u0103. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 122, sec\u021biunea A, parag. V<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    2.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0inculpatul ANTON Cristian<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0s-ar fi interesat la diverse institu\u021bii privind cauzele penale \u00een desf\u0103\u0219urare care l-ar putea afecta \u00een activitatea infrac\u021bional\u0103,\u00a0fapt ce confirm\u0103 un risc de \u00eempiedicare a bunei desf\u0103\u015fur\u0103ri a procesului penal.<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(\u2026)\u2019, paragraf urmat de redarea unui pasaj dintr-o \u2018conversa\u021bie\u2019 \u2013 pag. 123, parag. V \u0219i VI<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) acesta se intereseaz\u0103 la diverse institu\u021bii privind cauzele penale \u00een desf\u0103\u0219urare \u0219i care \u00eel pot afecta \u00een activitatea infrac\u021bional\u0103, exist\u00e2nd astfel riscul \u00eengreun\u0103rii cercet\u0103rilor. (\u2026)\u2019, paragraf urmat de redarea unui pasaj dintr-o \u2018conversa\u021bie\u2019 \u2013 pag. 123, parag. IV \u0219i V<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    3.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026)\u00a0Chiar exist\u00e2nd indicii<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0c\u0103 ar putea face obiectul unor cercet\u0103ri,\u00a0inculpatul ANTON Cristian, \u00eempreun\u0103 cu inculpatul RADU Bogdan \u2013 Alexandru par<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0s\u0103 conceap\u0103 planuri de a continua activitatea infrac\u021bional\u0103, discut\u00e2nd de a se muta \u0219i pe zona Bistri\u021ba \u2013 N\u0103s\u0103ud. (\u2026)\u2019, paragraf urmat de redarea unui pasaj dintr-o \u2018conversa\u021bie\u2019 \u2013 pag. 123, parag. VII<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) \u00een ciuda tuturor indiciilor c\u0103 ar putea face obiectul unor cercet\u0103ri, cei doi inculpa\u021bi continu\u0103 s\u0103 conceap\u0103 planuri prin care s\u0103 distrag\u0103 aten\u021bia, \u00een timp ce continu\u0103 activitatea infrac\u021bional\u0103, ace\u0219tia discut\u00e2nd de a se muta \u0219i pe zona Bistri\u021ba \u2013 N\u0103s\u0103ud. (\u2026)\u2019, paragraf urmat de redarea unui pasaj dintr-o \u2018conversa\u021bie\u2019 \u2013 pag. 124, parag. II<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    \n

    4.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u2018(\u2026) Inculpatul ANTON Cristian, prin presupusul comportament infrac\u0163ional, pare s\u0103 \u00eencalce \u00een mod obi\u0219nuit \u00eendatoririle pe care \u015fi le-a asumat, ignor\u00e2ndu-\u015fi complet atribu\u0163iile de serviciu, din convorbirile \u00eenregistrate \u00een mediul ambiental reie\u015find c\u0103 \u00eentreaga institu\u021bie ar fi fost deturnat\u0103 de la scopul s\u0103u legal, persoanele incluse \u00een comisiile de examinare pentru ob\u021binerea atestatelor profesionale permi\u021b\u00e2nd fraudarea acestora \u00een numele inculpatului sau chiar pe cont propriu. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 123, parag. VIII<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n

    \u2018(\u2026) \u00cen ceea ce prive\u0219te persoana inculpatului ANTON Cristian, profilul care s-a conturat este cel al unei persoane f\u0103r\u0103 niciun fel de respect pentru profesia pe care o exercit\u0103 \u0219i pentru \u00eendatoririle pe care \u015fi le-a asumat, care \u00ee\u0219i \u00eencalc\u0103 atribu\u0163iile de serviciu \u00eentr-o manier\u0103 notorie, din<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    convorbirile \u00eenregistrate \u00een mediul ambiental reie\u015find c\u0103 \u00eentreaga institu\u021bie ar fi fost deturnat\u0103 de la scopul s\u0103u legal, persoanele incluse \u00een comisiile de examinare pentru ob\u021binerea atestatelor profesionale permi\u021b\u00e2nd fraudarea acestora \u00een numele inculpatului sau chiar pe cont propriu. (\u2026)\u2019 \u2013 pag. 125, parag. III<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.39.\u00a0\u00a0Este astfel evident c\u0103\u00a0imposibilitatea identific\u0103rii motivelor pentru care tribunalul a ajuns la o anumit\u0103 concluzie pune serios \u00een discu\u021bie nu doar modalitatea \u00een care argumentele ap\u0103r\u0103rii au fost cu adev\u0103rat examinate, dar chiar \u00eens\u0103\u0219i existen\u021ba unei reale examin\u0103ri.\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>\u00cen acest sens, Ct.E.D.O. a statuat, \u00een repetate r\u00e2nduri, faptul c\u0103 DOAR o motivare din care s\u0103 reias\u0103 cu suficient\u0103 claritate temeiurile pentru care judec\u0103torul \u0219i-a fundamentat hot\u0103r\u00e2rea ofer\u0103 posibilitatea acuzatului de a-\u0219i exercita \u00een mod efectiv dreptul la o cale de atac\u00a0(a se vedea cauzele HADJIANASTASSIOU c. Greciei, parag. 33, HIRSISAARI c. Finlandei, parag. 30).\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.40.\u00a0\u00a0Lipsa motiv\u0103rii sau motivarea insuficient\u0103 a deciziei de arestare reprezint\u0103, \u00een jurisprunden\u021ba Ct.E.D.O., unul dintre elementele pe care Curtea se bazeaz\u0103 pentru a aprecia legalitatea \u00een temeiul art. 5 parag. 1 din Conven\u021bie, iar o asemenea decizie este INCOMPATIBIL\u0102 cu principiul protec\u021biei \u00eempotriva arbitrariului<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>, consacrat de textul de lege invocat\u00a0<\/em><\/i>(a se vedea STASAITIS \u00eempotriva Lituaniei).<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/p>\n

    1.41.\u00a0\u00a0\u00cen realitate, \u00eencheierea NU con\u021bine un ra\u021bionament juridic propriu al instan\u021bei, ci se limiteaz\u0103 la reproducerea materialului furnizat de acuzare, F\u0102R\u0102 ca judec\u0103torul s\u0103 procedeze la o evaluare efectiv\u0103 a acestuia. Lipsesc elementele esen\u021biale ale deliber\u0103rii judiciare \u2013 analiza ap\u0103r\u0103rilor, filtrarea critic\u0103 a probelor \u0219i justificarea concret\u0103 a m\u0103surii \u2013 ceea ce relev\u0103 nu o motivare insuficient\u0103, ci ABSEN\u021aA exerci\u021biului real de jurisdic\u021bie.<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.42.\u00a0\u00a0\u00cen acela\u0219i timp,\u00a0<\/em><\/i>NEMOTIVAREA cazului de arestare de c\u0103tre judec\u0103tor determin\u0103 NECUNOA\u0218TEREA de c\u0103tre inculpatul arestat \u00een cauz\u0103 a MOTIVELOR efective\/concrete care stau la baza solu\u021biei de luare a m\u0103surii preventive \u00een discu\u021bie<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>, \u00eenc\u0103lc\u00e2ndu-se astfel \u0219i garan\u021bia constitu\u021bional\u0103 prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 23 alin. (8), reiterat\u0103 de art. 226 alin. (1) C.Proc.Pen.\u00a0<\/em><\/i>(\u00een cuprinsul \u00eencheierii trebuind a fi enun\u021bate MOTIVELE pentru care s-a dispus arestarea preventiv\u0103 a inculpatului).<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.43.\u00a0\u00a0Potrivit Regulamentului de ordine interioar\u0103 al instan\u021belor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti, aprobat prin Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea Plenului C.S.M. nr. 3243\/2022,\u00a0\u2018MOTIVAREA hot\u0103r\u00e2rii judec\u0103tore\u015fti trebuie s\u0103 arate SILOGISMUL JURIDIC din care rezult\u0103 aplicarea normei de drept la situa\u0163ia de fapt re\u0163inut\u0103\u2019.\u00a0[art.128 alin. (1) teza final\u0103], iar \u00een c\u0103ile de atac\u00a0\u2018MOTIVAREA hot\u0103r\u00e2rii judec\u0103tore\u015fti trebuie s\u0103 arate ARGUMENTELE pentru care s-a pronun\u0163at solu\u0163ia \u00een calea de atac \u015fi sus\u0163inerile care au fost \u00eenl\u0103turate\u2019.\u00a0[art.128 alin. (2) teza final\u0103]. Totodat\u0103, potrivit Avizului nr. 11 (2008) al Consiliului Consultativ al Judec\u0103torilor Europeni (C.C.J.E.) \u00een aten\u021bia Comitetului de Mini\u0219tri al Consiliului Europei privind calitatea hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u015fti,\u00a0\u2018Pentru a fi de calitate, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 trebuie perceput\u0103 de justi\u0163iabil \u015fi de societate \u00een general drept rezultatul unei aplic\u0103ri pertinente a regulilor de drept, al unei proceduri echitabile \u015fi al unei aprecieri conving\u0103toare a faptelor, fiind executabil\u0103. Justi\u0163iabilul va avea atunci convingerea c\u0103 a fost EXAMINAT\u0102 cauza sa \u015fi c\u0103 a fost solu\u0163ionat\u0103 corect \u015fi societatea va percepe hot\u0103r\u00e2rea ca pe un factor ce poate restabili pacea social\u0103 (pct. 31)\u2019.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.44.\u00a0\u00a0Deopotriv\u0103, at\u00e2t \u00een jurispruden\u021ba constant\u0103 a Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, c\u00e2t \u0219i \u00een jurispruden\u021ba instan\u021bei europene de contencios al drepturilor omului, s-a statuat c\u0103 o motivare \u015fi o analiz\u0103 clare sunt cerin\u0163e fundamentale ale hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u015fti \u015fi un aspect important al dreptului la un proces echitabil. Art. 6 din Conven\u0163ia pentru ap\u0103rarea drepturilor omului \u015fi a libert\u0103\u0163ilor fundamentale dispune, printre altele, obliga\u0163ia statelor de a institui instan\u0163e independente \u015fi impar\u0163iale \u015fi de a promova instaurarea procedurilor eficiente. \u00cendeplinirea acestor obliga\u0163ii cap\u0103t\u0103 sens c\u00e2nd are ca rezultat \u00eemputernicirea judec\u0103torilor de a administra \u00een mod just \u015fi corect justi\u0163ia, at\u00e2t \u00een drept, c\u00e2t \u015fi \u00een fapt, \u00een avantajul strict al cet\u0103\u0163enilor.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.45.\u00a0\u00a0\u00cen acest sens, \u00een jurispruden\u0163a instan\u0163ei europene s-a subliniat \u00een mod constant rolul pe care motivarea unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri \u00eel are pentru respectarea art. 6 parag. 1 din C.E.D.O., ar\u0103t\u00e2ndu-se c\u0103\u00a0dreptul la un proces echitabil NU poate fi considerat efectiv dec\u00e2t dac\u0103 sus\u0163inerile p\u0103r\u0163ilor sunt examinate de c\u0103tre instan\u0163\u0103, aceasta av\u00e2nd obliga\u0163ia de a proceda la un examen concret al mijloacelor, argumentelor \u015fi elementelor de prob\u0103, sau cel pu\u0163in de a le aprecia<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(cauza ALBINA \u00eempotriva Rom\u00e2niei).\u00a0Obligativitatea motiv\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u015fti constituie o condi\u0163ie a procesului echitabil, exigen\u0163\u0103 prev\u0103zut\u0103 \u015fi de art. 21 alin. (3) din Constitu\u0163ia Rom\u00e2niei \u015fi art. 6 alin. (1) din C.E.D.O.\u00a0Dreptul la un proces echitabil nu poate fi considerat efectiv dec\u00e2t dac\u0103 observa\u0163iile p\u0103r\u0163ilor sunt \u00eentr-adev\u0103r ascultate, adic\u0103 analizate corespunz\u0103tor de c\u0103tre instan\u0163a sesizat\u0103<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(cauza Dumitru Popescu \u00eempotriva Rom\u00e2niei).\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.46.\u00a0\u00a0Prin Decizia nr. 233\/2021, Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a ar\u0103tat c\u0103\u00a0\u201839. (\u2026) Potrivit jurispruden\u0163ei constante a instan\u021bei europene, care reflect\u0103 un principiu legat de buna administrare a justi\u0163iei, hot\u0103r\u00e2rile judec\u0103tore\u015fti trebuie s\u0103 indice \u00een mod suficient MOTIVELE PE CARE SE \u00ceNTEMEIAZ\u0102 [Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea din 25 iulie 2002, pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Cauza PAPON \u00eempotriva Fran\u0163ei]. DREPTUL LA O DECIZIE MOTIVAT\u0102 \u00ee\u0219i are originile \u00eentr-un principiu mai general \u00eencorporat \u00een Conven\u021bie, care protejeaz\u0103 un individ \u00eempotriva arbitrariului; decizia intern\u0103 ar trebui s\u0103 con\u021bin\u0103 MOTIVELE care sunt suficiente pentru a face fa\u021b\u0103 aspectelor esen\u021biale de fapt \u0219i de drept \u00een cazul p\u0103r\u021bilor litigante \u2013 argumentul de fond sau de procedur\u0103 (Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea din 9 decembrie 1994, pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een Cauza RUIZ TORIJA \u00eempotriva Spaniei, paragrafele 29 \u0219i 30). 40. \u00cen mod similar, \u00een jurispruden\u021ba Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale s-a statuat c\u0103 OBLIGATIVITATEA MOTIV\u0102RII hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u015fti constituie o CONDI\u0162IE a procesului echitabil, exigen\u0163\u0103 a art. 21 alin. (3) din Constitu\u0163ie \u015fi a art. 6 paragraful 1 din Conven\u0163ia pentru ap\u0103rarea drepturilor omului \u015fi a libert\u0103\u0163ilor fundamentale (Decizia nr. 33 din 23 ianuarie 2018, precitat\u0103, paragraful 173). \u00cen aceea\u0219i decizie, Curtea a re\u021binut c\u0103 motivarea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii judec\u0103tore\u015fti este un act inerent func\u0163iei judec\u0103torului cauzei \u0219i constituie expresia independen\u0163ei sale. Motivarea nu constituie doar premisa unei bune \u00een\u0163elegeri a hot\u0103r\u00e2rii, ci \u015fi GARAN\u0162IA accept\u0103rii sale de c\u0103tre justi\u0163iabil, care se va supune actului de justi\u0163ie av\u00e2nd \u00eencrederea c\u0103 nu este un act arbitrar. Ea reprezint\u0103 un element esen\u0163ial al hot\u0103r\u00e2rii judec\u0103tore\u015fti, o puternic\u0103 garan\u0163ie a impar\u0163ialit\u0103\u0163ii judec\u0103torului \u015fi a calit\u0103\u0163ii actului de justi\u0163ie, precum \u015fi o premis\u0103 a exercit\u0103rii corespunz\u0103toare de c\u0103tre instan\u0163a superioar\u0103 a atribu\u0163iilor de control judiciar de legalitate \u015fi temeinicie. Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea instan\u0163ei trebuie s\u0103 cuprind\u0103, ca o garan\u0163ie a caracterului echitabil al procedurii judiciare \u015fi a respect\u0103rii dreptului la ap\u0103rare al p\u0103r\u0163ilor, motivele de fapt \u015fi de drept care au format convingerea instan\u0163ei, precum \u015fi cele pentru care s-au \u00eenl\u0103turat cererile\/ap\u0103r\u0103rile p\u0103r\u0163ilor (paragraful 171) 41. \u00cen aceste condi\u021bii, Curtea constat\u0103 c\u0103 at\u00e2t \u00een propria jurispruden\u021b\u0103, c\u00e2t \u0219i \u00een jurispruden\u021ba instan\u021bei europene de contencios al drepturilor omului s-a statuat, \u00een mod unanim, c\u0103 motivarea permite nu numai o mai bun\u0103 \u00een\u021belegere \u0219i acceptare a hot\u0103r\u00e2rii judec\u0103tore\u0219ti de c\u0103tre justi\u021biabil, ci constituie, mai ales, o garan\u021bie \u00eempotriva arbitrariului. Pe de o parte, ea oblig\u0103 judec\u0103torul s\u0103 disting\u0103 mijloacele de ap\u0103rare ale p\u0103r\u0163ilor \u015fi s\u0103 precizeze elementele care \u00eei justific\u0103 decizia \u015fi o fac s\u0103 fie conform\u0103 legii \u015fi, pe de alt\u0103 parte, permite o \u00een\u0163elegere a func\u0163ion\u0103rii justi\u0163iei de c\u0103tre societate\u2019.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.47.\u00a0\u00a0\u00cen consecin\u021b\u0103, conduita descris\u0103 impune analizarea inciden\u021bei dispozi\u021biilor art. 271 lit. r) teza a II-a din Legea nr. 303\/2022, \u00eentruc\u00e2t motivarea formal\u0103, exclusiv aparent\u0103, realizat\u0103 prin preluarea masiv\u0103 \u0219i necritic\u0103 a actului procurorului, echivaleaz\u0103, \u00een substan\u021ba sa, cu lipsa total\u0103 a motiv\u0103rii judiciare reale\u00a0(judec\u0103torul nefiind chemat s\u0103 reproduc\u0103 teza acuz\u0103rii, ci s\u0103 o supun\u0103 unui examen propriu, critic, contradictoriu \u0219i individualizat; or, tocmai aceast\u0103 exigen\u021b\u0103 pare s\u0103 fi lipsit \u00een cauza de fa\u021b\u0103).<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.48.\u00a0\u00a0Potrivit dispozi\u021biilor art. 270 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 303\/2022,\u00a0JUDEC\u0102TORII r\u0103spund disciplinar pentru s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea, cu VINOV\u0102\u0162IE, a abaterilor disciplinare prev\u0103zute de lege.<\/strong><\/b><\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.49.\u00a0\u00a0Sub aspectul laturii obiective<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>,\u00a0(i)\u00a0abaterea disciplinar\u0103 prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 271 lit. a) const\u0103 \u00een\u00a0\u00eenc\u0103lcarea prevederilor legale referitoare la incompatibilit\u0103\u021bi<\/strong><\/b>,\u00a0(ii)\u00a0abaterea prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 271 lit. h) const\u0103 \u00een\u00a0nerespectarea \u00eendatoririi de a se ab\u021bine atunci c\u00e2nd judec\u0103torul \u0219tie c\u0103 exist\u0103 una dintre cauzele prev\u0103zute de lege pentru ab\u021binerea sa<\/strong><\/b>,\u00a0(iii)\u00a0abaterea prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 271 lit. r) const\u0103 \u00een\u00a0redactarea unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri \u00een care motivarea este formal\u0103, aparent\u0103 sau lipsit\u0103 de o analiz\u0103 judiciar\u0103 proprie<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(inclusiv \u00een ipoteza \u00een care considerentele reprezint\u0103 o preluare preponderent\u0103, necritic\u0103, a sus\u021binerilor uneia dintre p\u0103r\u021bi, f\u0103r\u0103 examinarea efectiv\u0103 a ap\u0103r\u0103rilor \u0219i f\u0103r\u0103 expunerea unui ra\u021bionament juridic autonom, situa\u021bie ce echivaleaz\u0103, \u00een substan\u021b\u0103, cu lipsa motiv\u0103rii reale ori cu o motivare v\u0103dit contrar\u0103 exigen\u021belor logico-juridice ale actului de justi\u021bie), iar\u00a0(iv)\u00a0abaterea prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 271 lit. s) const\u0103 \u00een\u00a0exercitarea func\u021biei cu rea-credin\u021b\u0103 sau grav\u0103 neglijen\u021b\u0103<\/strong><\/b>, astfel cum aceste no\u021biuni sunt definite de art. 272 din legea cadru, iar\u00a0sub aspectul laturii subiective<\/strong><\/b>, faptele sunt imputabile tocmai pentru c\u0103\u00a0magistratul<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0(i)\u00a0cuno\u0219tea \u00een mod clar \u0219i amplu existen\u021ba \u00eemprejur\u0103rilor care generau obliga\u021bia de ab\u021binere \u0219i, cu toate acestea, a continuat s\u0103 exercite atribu\u021biile judiciare \u00een cauz\u0103<\/strong><\/b>,\u00a0(ii)\u00a0a nesocotit cu \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 sau, dup\u0103 caz, \u00een mod grav, ne\u00eendoielnic \u0219i nescuzabil normele procesuale incidente privind garantarea impar\u021bialit\u0103\u021bii instan\u021bei<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u0219i\u00a0(iii)\u00a0a pronun\u021bat \u0219i redactat o hot\u0103r\u00e2re care reprezint\u0103 doar o preluare formal\u0103 \u0219i masiv\u0103 a perspectivei acuz\u0103rii, f\u0103r\u0103 o analiz\u0103 judiciar\u0103 proprie, efectiv\u0103 \u0219i autonom\u0103:<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (i)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>\u00cen ceea ce prive\u0219te abaterea prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 271 lit. a)<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>, de\u0219i nu se invoc\u0103 o situa\u021bie clasic\u0103 de incompatibilitate formal\u0103, conduita analizat\u0103 relev\u0103 o situa\u021bie asimilat\u0103 acesteia, \u00een care judec\u0103torul, prin modul concret de exercitare a func\u021biei, a dep\u0103\u0219it cadrul rolului s\u0103u jurisdic\u021bional \u0219i a abandonat pozi\u021bia de echidistan\u021b\u0103. Astfel, prin validarea repetat\u0103, \u00een termeni de certitudine, a tezei acuz\u0103rii \u0219i prin exteriorizarea unor concluzii ferme asupra elementelor esen\u021biale ale cauzei anterior solu\u021bion\u0103rii propunerii de arestare preventiv\u0103, judec\u0103torul a ajuns, \u00een mod implicit, s\u0103 se pozi\u021bioneze \u00een sfera intereselor acuz\u0103rii, asum\u00e2nd un rol incompatibil cu func\u021bia de arbitru impar\u021bial. O asemenea conduit\u0103 nu doar c\u0103 afecteaz\u0103 impar\u021bialitatea efectiv\u0103, dar compromite grav \u0219i aparen\u021ba acesteia, exigen\u021b\u0103 esen\u021bial\u0103 \u00een arhitectura dreptului la un proces echitabil, fiind de natur\u0103 s\u0103 afecteze\u00a0(\u00een mod direct \u0219i iremediabil)\u00a0drepturile p\u0103r\u021bilor \u0219i \u00eenf\u0103ptuirea actului de justi\u021bie \u00een condi\u021bii de deplin\u0103 legalitate \u0219i s\u0103 submineze \u00eencrederea publicului \u00een actul de justi\u021bie\u00a0(afect\u00e2nd imaginea justi\u021biei ca serviciu public).\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (ii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Sub aspectul abaterii prev\u0103zute de art. 271 lit. h)<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>, conduita magistratului relev\u0103 o \u00eenc\u0103lcare evident\u0103 a obliga\u021biei de ab\u021binere, \u00een condi\u021biile \u00een care modul de solu\u021bionare a cauzei a generat, \u00een mod obiectiv \u0219i rezonabil, o aparen\u021b\u0103 serioas\u0103 de lips\u0103 de impar\u021bialitate. \u00cen mod concret, judec\u0103torul nu s-a limitat la o analiz\u0103 proprie, autonom\u0103 \u0219i critic\u0103 a probelor \u0219i sus\u021binerilor p\u0103r\u021bilor, ci a preluat \u00een mod aproape integral perspectiva acuz\u0103rii, f\u0103r\u0103 distan\u021bare \u0219i f\u0103r\u0103 examinarea efectiv\u0103 a ap\u0103r\u0103rilor formulate, ceea ce creeaz\u0103 percep\u021bia clar\u0103 c\u0103 instan\u021ba s-a identificat cu pozi\u021bia Ministerului Public. \u00cen aceste condi\u021bii, judec\u0103torul nu doar c\u0103 trebuia s\u0103 con\u0219tientizeze existen\u021ba unui risc serios de afectare a aparen\u021bei de impar\u021bialitate, dar avea obliga\u021bia pozitiv\u0103 de a formula declara\u021bie de ab\u021binere, raportat la standardul obiectiv consacrat \u00een jurispruden\u021ba constant\u0103 a Cur\u021bii Europene a Drepturilor Omului. Persisten\u021ba \u00een solu\u021bionarea cauzei, \u00een pofida acestor elemente, eviden\u021biaz\u0103 un comportament incompatibil cu exigen\u021bele func\u021biei judiciare \u0219i cu garan\u021biile fundamentale ale unui proces echitabil.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (iii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Sub aspectul abaterii prev\u0103zute de art. 271 lit. r)<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>, v\u0103 rog s\u0103 constata\u021bi c\u0103 \u00eencheierea de arestare preventiv\u0103 NU con\u021bine un ra\u021bionament juridic propriu al instan\u021bei, ci se limiteaz\u0103 la reproducerea materialului furnizat de acuzare, f\u0103r\u0103 ca judec\u0103torul s\u0103 procedeze la o evaluare efectiv\u0103 a acestuia. Aceast\u0103 modalitate de redactare, caracterizat\u0103 prin preluarea structurii, a formul\u0103rilor \u0219i chiar a erorilor materiale ale actului de sesizare, relev\u0103 absen\u021ba unei analize judiciare autonome, \u00een sensul cerut de lege. Or, obliga\u021bia de motivare presupune nu doar reluarea materialului probator, ci efectuarea unui ra\u021bionament juridic propriu, care s\u0103 reflecte\u00a0(i)\u00a0examinarea\/ analiza ap\u0103r\u0103rilor formulate,\u00a0(ii)\u00a0evaluarea \u0219i filtrarea critic\u0103 a probelor \u0219i\u00a0(iii)\u00a0justificarea concret\u0103 a necesit\u0103\u021bii m\u0103surii preventive. \u00cen lipsa acestor elemente, actul jurisdic\u021bional devine unul formal, incompatibil cu exigen\u021bele art. 203 alin. (5) \u0219i art. 226 alin. (1) C.Proc.Pen., precum \u0219i cu standardele stabilite \u00een jurispruden\u021ba Cur\u021bii Europene a Drepturilor Omului.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    (iv)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i>Din perspectiva abaterii prev\u0103zute de art. 271 lit. s)<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>, apreciez c\u0103, sub aspectul laturii subiective, faptele descrise se circumscriu no\u021biunii de grav\u0103 neglijen\u021b\u0103\u00a0(\u00een sensul art. 272 din Legea nr. 303\/2022), \u00eentruc\u00e2t magistratul a ignorat \u00een mod v\u0103dit \u0219i nejustificat obliga\u021bii esen\u021biale ale func\u021biei, respectiv\u00a0(i)\u00a0obliga\u021bia de motivare real\u0103,\u00a0(ii)\u00a0obliga\u021bia de analiz\u0103 a ap\u0103r\u0103rilor \u0219i\u00a0(iii)\u00a0obliga\u021bia de garantare a impar\u021bialit\u0103\u021bii. Caracterul grav al neglijen\u021bei rezult\u0103 din consecin\u021bele directe ale conduitei, respectiv afectarea dreptului la un proces echitabil \u0219i transformarea actului jurisdic\u021bional \u00eentr-o validare formal\u0103 a pozi\u021biei acuz\u0103rii \u2013 cu consecin\u021ba afect\u0103rii\u00a0(\u00een mod direct \u0219i iremediabil)\u00a0drepturilor p\u0103r\u021bilor \u0219i a \u00eenf\u0103ptuirii actului de justi\u021bie \u00een condi\u021bii de deplin\u0103 legalitate \u0219i a submin\u0103rii \u00eencrederii publicului \u00een actul de justi\u021bie\u00a0(afect\u00e2nd imaginea justi\u021biei ca serviciu public). Conduita descris\u0103 dep\u0103\u0219e\u0219te cu mult sfera unei simple deficien\u021be de motivare sau a unei aprecieri discutabile a probelor, \u00eentruc\u00e2t eviden\u021biaz\u0103 o\u00a0ignorare evident\u0103 a standardelor minime de analiz\u0103 judiciar\u0103<\/strong><\/b>, impuse de dispozi\u021biile legale \u0219i de jurispruden\u021ba Cur\u021bii Europene a Drepturilor Omului. Preluarea aproape integral\u0103 a perspectivei acuz\u0103rii, \u00een absen\u021ba unei evalu\u0103ri critice \u0219i a unei examin\u0103ri reale a ap\u0103r\u0103rilor formulate, echivaleaz\u0103 cu o\u00a0exercitare formal\u0103 a atribu\u021biilor jurisdic\u021bionale<\/strong><\/b>, incompatibil\u0103 cu rolul constitu\u021bional al judec\u0103torului. \u00cen aceste condi\u021bii, conduita se circumscrie no\u021biunii de\u00a0grav\u0103 neglijen\u021b\u0103<\/strong><\/b>, \u00een sensul art. 271 din Legea nr. 303\/2022, \u00eentruc\u00e2t abaterea de la standardele profesionale nu este una marginal\u0103 sau accidental\u0103, ci una evident\u0103, repetat\u0103 \u0219i cu consecin\u021be directe asupra dreptului fundamental la libertate.<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.50.\u00a0\u00a0Se impune astfel a sublinia c\u0103\u00a0elementele expuse nu configureaz\u0103 o simpl\u0103 eroare de judecat\u0103 sau o interpretare discutabil\u0103 a probelor, ci relev\u0103 un mod constant \u0219i sistematic de exercitare a func\u021biei judiciare, caracterizat prin validarea repetat\u0103 \u0219i necritic\u0103 a aceleia\u0219i teze acuzatorii, \u00een absen\u021ba unei analize autonome \u0219i efective<\/strong><\/b>. Or, \u00een jurispruden\u021ba constant\u0103 a Inspec\u021biei Judiciare, caracterul repetitiv \u0219i convergent al unor astfel de conduite reprezint\u0103 un criteriu determinant pentru angajarea r\u0103spunderii disciplinare, \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care acestea reflect\u0103 nu o simpl\u0103 apreciere punctual\u0103, ci o practic\u0103 judiciar\u0103 deficitar\u0103, de natur\u0103 s\u0103 afecteze \u00een mod direct garan\u021biile procesului echitabil \u0219i \u00eencrederea publicului \u00een actul de justi\u021bie.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.51.\u00a0\u00a0Gravitatea conduitei este amplificat\u0103 de natura procedurii \u00een care aceasta s-a manifestat, respectiv solu\u021bionarea unei propuneri de arestare preventiv\u0103, care implic\u0103 analiza celui mai important atribut al persoanei \u2013 libertatea individual\u0103<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>. \u00cen acest context, orice aparen\u021b\u0103 de lips\u0103 de impar\u021bialitate sau de analiz\u0103 formal\u0103 dob\u00e2nde\u0219te o intensitate sporit\u0103, fiind de natur\u0103 s\u0103 afecteze \u00een mod direct legitimitatea m\u0103surii dispuse \u0219i \u00eencrederea justi\u021biabilului c\u0103 situa\u021bia sa juridic\u0103 a fost examinat\u0103 \u00een mod real \u0219i efectiv. Or, tocmai aceast\u0103 dimensiune a consecin\u021belor\u00a0(asupra libert\u0103\u021bii individuale \u0219i asupra percep\u021biei publice a actului de justi\u021bie)\u00a0este recunoscut\u0103 constant \u00een practica Inspec\u021biei Judiciare ca element esen\u021bial \u00een calificarea unei conduite ca abatere disciplinar\u0103.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.52.\u00a0\u00a0Nu \u00een ultimul r\u00e2nd, se impune a se re\u021bine c\u0103\u00a0nu ne afl\u0103m \u00een prezen\u021ba unui act izolat, ci a unui pattern de conduit\u0103 judiciar\u0103, manifestat pe parcursul mai multor \u00eencheieri succesive, caracterizat prin utilizarea constant\u0103 a acelora\u0219i formul\u0103ri de certitudine \u0219i prin validarea repetat\u0103 a aceleia\u0219i teze acuzatorii<\/strong><\/b>. Aceast\u0103 repetitivitate\u00a0exclude caracterul accidental al conduitei \u0219i eviden\u021biaz\u0103 o modalitate constant\u0103 de exercitare a func\u021biei, incompatibil\u0103 cu exigen\u021bele impar\u021bialit\u0103\u021bii \u0219i ale rolului judec\u0103torului \u00een procesul penal.<\/strong><\/b>\u00a0\u00cen aceste condi\u021bii, r\u0103spunderea disciplinar\u0103 nu poate fi analizat\u0103 fragmentar, prin raportare la un singur act procesual, ci trebuie evaluat\u0103 \u00een ansamblu, prin prisma conduitei unitare \u0219i continue a magistratului.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    1.53.\u00a0\u00a0\u00cemprejur\u0103rile descrise relev\u0103\u00a0\u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103ri grave ale obliga\u021biilor profesionale esen\u021biale ale magistratului<\/strong><\/b>, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 obliga\u021bia de ab\u021binere, respectarea regimului incompatibilit\u0103\u021bilor \u0219i obliga\u021bia de a pronun\u021ba hot\u0103r\u00e2ri motivate \u00een mod real \u0219i autonom nu reprezint\u0103 simple facult\u0103\u021bi, ci exigen\u021be imperative, instituite \u00een vederea garant\u0103rii dreptului fundamental la un proces echitabil \u0219i a protec\u021biei justi\u021biabilului \u00eempotriva arbitrariului.\u00a0Nerespectarea acestor obliga\u021bii, \u00een contextul dat, este de natur\u0103 s\u0103 justifice declan\u0219area cercet\u0103rii disciplinare \u0219i evaluarea conduitei magistratului din perspectiva abaterilor prev\u0103zute de\u00a0<\/strong><\/b>art.\u00a0271 lit. a), h), r) \u0219i s) din Legea nr. 303\/2022<\/strong><\/b>.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

    Urmarea imediat\u0103 a conduitei descrise<\/em><\/i><\/strong><\/b>\u00a0const\u0103 \u00een afectarea aparen\u021bei de impar\u021bialitate \u0219i a \u00eencrederii legitime pe care justi\u021biabilul trebuie s\u0103 o aib\u0103 \u00een faptul c\u0103 propunerea de arestare preventiv\u0103 este examinat\u0103 \u0219i solu\u021bionat\u0103 de un judec\u0103tor aflat \u00eentr-o pozi\u021bie de deplin\u0103 neutralitate \u0219i echidistan\u021b\u0103, precum \u0219i \u00een afectarea \u00eencrederii c\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea prin care se dispune o m\u0103sur\u0103 preventiv\u0103 privativ\u0103 de libertate este rezultatul unei analize judiciare reale, proprii \u0219i efective \u2013 situa\u021bie care este de natur\u0103 s\u0103 aduc\u0103 atingere bunei \u00eenf\u0103ptuiri a actului de justi\u021bie \u0219i prestigiului acesteia, justific\u00e2nd analizarea conduitei sub aspect disciplinar de c\u0103tre organele competente\u201d<\/em><\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n

    * Citi\u021bi aici \u00eentreaga pl\u00e2ngere disciplinar\u0103 \u00eempotriva judec\u0103toarei Camelia Grecu<\/a><\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

    sursa: luju.ro<\/strong><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n