{"id":1903276,"date":"2026-04-26T09:25:00","date_gmt":"2026-04-26T06:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1903276"},"modified":"2026-04-26T09:25:00","modified_gmt":"2026-04-26T06:25:00","slug":"the-brief-and-annoying-period-where-car-ads-bragged-about-0-50-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1903276","title":{"rendered":"The Brief And Annoying Period Where Car Ads Bragged About 0-50 Times"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"columns-holder \">\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Car advertisements have always stretched the truth, but in the early 1980s, some manufacturers found a more creative way to do it: just change the finish line. If you&#8217;ve spent any time digging\u00a0through old car ads, you&#8217;ve probably noticed something odd tucked into\u00a0the performance claims of a few early-1980s models. These claims advertised 0-50 mph sprint times instead of the industry-standard\u00a00-60 mph benchmark that had been in use since automotive journalist Tom McCahill pioneered it in 1946.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">McCahill likely chose 60 mph because state-level speed limits already hovered around 50-60 mph at the time. That logic flipped when President Nixon signed the 55 mph national speed limit into law in 1974 as a response to the 1973 oil embargo.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.autoweek.com\/car-life\/classic-cars\/a33361860\/1984-dodge-daytona-does-0-50-in-576-seconds\/\" target=\"_blank\">Autoweek<\/a> notes that car companies of the era &#8220;had to&#8221; advertise 0-50 times instead of 0-60, though there&#8217;s seemingly no formal regulation that ever explicitly required it. Still, the practical incentive was clear enough on its own: 60 mph was now an illegal speed on American highways, and benchmarking against it felt increasingly disconnected from everyday driving reality.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">As\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.hagerty.com\/media\/opinion\/avoidable-contact-0-60-has-got-to-go\/\" target=\"_blank\">Hagerty<\/a>&#8216;s Jack Baruth summed it up, 0-50 and 0-55 were the &#8220;bastard cousins&#8221; of 0-60. They were metrics that existed not because they were more meaningful, but because the cars couldn&#8217;t look good without them. The trick was entirely legal, as there was no rule requiring a standardized sprint distance in advertising copy. Automakers facing an uphill performance battle simply picked a number that worked in their favor.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"columns-holder \">\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Chrysler was one of the most brazen practitioners of the 0-50 trick, and the 1982 Dodge Charger 2.2\u00a0\u2013 one of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jalopnik.com\/these-are-the-worst-cars-from-great-automakers-1851601071\/\" target=\"_blank\">the worst cars from an arguably great automaker<\/a>\u00a0\u2013 is a notorious example. On paper, the car made 84 horsepower and 111 pound-feet of torque from a 2.2-liter four-cylinder in a body that traced its roots back to the economy Dodge Omni. Squaring that up against a Mustang GT or Camaro Z28 in a straight-line test was never going to end well.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Because of that, Dodge brought the National Hot Rod Association in to officially clock the competition at 50 mph instead of 60, stamped the results on a magazine spread, and called it a day. Two years on, the 1984 Dodge Daytona Turbo Z repeated the formula. When <a href=\"https:\/\/www.motortrend.com\/features\/1983-ford-mustang-chevrolet-camaro-dodge-daytona-comparison\" target=\"_blank\">MotorTrend<\/a> put it head-to-head with the Mustang GT and Camaro Z28, the numbers told an uncomfortable story: the Daytona ran a 0-50 time of\u00a06.01 seconds against the Camaro&#8217;s 5.37 and the Mustang&#8217;s 5.90.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">When scaling the disappointment to 60 mph, the gap only widened. The Daytona Turbo Z clocked\u00a08.22 seconds against 7.41 and 7.43\u00a0for the Camaro and Mustang, respectively. Advertising 0-50 didn&#8217;t make the Daytona Turbo Z fast \u2014 it just made the scoreboard easier to look at. Ironically, while Dodge was busy gaming acceleration benchmarks with the Daytona Turbo Z, it was simultaneously <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jalopnik.com\/dodge-once-threw-a-lamborghini-v8-into-a-dodge-daytona-1851483785\/\" target=\"_blank\">stuffing a Lamborghini V8 into a Daytona<\/a> behind closed doors. Later on, the 1985 model year saw the arrival of the turbocharged Shelby variant. This gave the Daytona Turbo Z\u00a0146 horsepower to play with, and the whole 0-50 charade quietly disappeared from Dodge&#8217;s ad copy.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"columns-holder \">\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The 0-50 trick had a hard expiration date, and just like how it (supposedly) came, it was taken down with a presidential pen stroke. Bill Clinton signed the National Highway System Designation Act on November 28, 1995, handing speed limit authority back to individual states. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jalopnik.com\/2050836\/us-states-lowest-speed-limits\/\" target=\"_blank\">A few U.S. areas still have low speed limits on the interstate<\/a>, but 60 mph isn&#8217;t as universally outlawed as it used to be.\u00a0Following the repeal,\u00a035 states moved to raise their limits to 70 mph or higher, and the rationale for advertising a 50 mph sprint collapsed overnight.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Cars were getting faster, limits were climbing, and\u00a00-60 reasserted itself as the only number anyone wanted to see in an ad. The only trace of the 0-50 era in modern times comes from a handful of archived magazine ads. These days, there are even a few factory cars that actually can hit 60 mph in two seconds or less. So the idea of bragging about a 0-50 sprint now seems less like a marketing trick and more like a punchline.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Car advertisements have always stretched the truth, but in the early 1980s, some manufacturers found a more creative way to do it: just change the finish line. If you&#8217;ve spent any time digging\u00a0through old car ads, you&#8217;ve probably noticed something odd tucked into\u00a0the performance claims of a few early-1980s models. These claims advertised 0-50 mph [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[226,247],"class_list":["post-1903276","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-crawlmanager","tag-jalopnik-com"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1903276","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1903276"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1903276\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1903276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1903276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1903276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}