{"id":1883111,"date":"2026-04-13T21:35:33","date_gmt":"2026-04-13T18:35:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1883111"},"modified":"2026-04-13T21:35:33","modified_gmt":"2026-04-13T18:35:33","slug":"openai-exec-reveals-new-strategy-in-leaked-memo-attack-anthropic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1883111","title":{"rendered":"OpenAI Exec Reveals New Strategy in Leaked Memo: Attack Anthropic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[analyse_image type=&#8221;featured&#8221; src=&#8221;https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/app\/uploads\/2026\/02\/altman-impact-1200&#215;675.jpg&#8221;]<\/p>\n<article class=\"post-2000745872 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-artificial-intelligence tag-ai-models tag-anthropic tag-artificial-intelligence tag-openai\">\n<div class=\"entry-content prose dark:prose-invert lg:prose-xl prose-main dark:prose-main\">\n<p>Over the weekend, OpenAI\u2019s chief new revenue officer, Denise Dresser, sent a memo to employees meant to detail the company\u2019s strategy going forward, but somehow ended up spending a considerable amount of ink on how little the company thinks of Anthropic. The memo, reported on by The Verge, included some direct shots at OpenAI\u2019s biggest rival, including claiming that Anthropic has been juicing its revenue figures.<\/p>\n<p>Per the memo, Dresser claimed that Anthropic uses \u201caccounting treatment that makes revenue look bigger than it is,\u201d and that has given a false impression of how long the company\u2019s run rate is. Just last week, Bloomberg reported Anthropic\u2019s annualized revenue is trending over $30 billion. OpenAI is throwing cold water on that, claiming that it believes Anthropic is overstating its situation by about $8 billion, dropping it to $22 billion. And wouldn\u2019t you know it, that puts Anthropic behind OpenAI, which has a reported run rate of around $24 billion.<\/p>\n<p>One of the objections that Dresser took with Anthropic\u2019s alleged revenue included \u201cgrossing up\u201d revenue-sharing agreements that the company has with Google and Amazon, instead of using net revenue figures.<\/p>\n<p>Funnily enough, though, part of the reason for Dresser\u2019s memo stems from OpenAI\u2019s own arrangement with Amazon. The giant online retailer just recently announced plans to invest up to $50 billion in OpenAI, which has given the firm new life as its status as a leader in the AI space slips away. In the memo, Dresser blamed OpenAI\u2019s partnership with Microsoft as a hurdle that \u201climited our ability to meet enterprises where they are.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With all that in mind, Dresser seems to believe that OpenAI still compares favorably in terms of its position in the market compared to rival Anthropic. While she acknowledged that Anthropic has a significant lead among enterprise customers thanks to its advantage in coding, she believes it\u2019s a tactical error for Anthropic to make a point of emphasis that its service actually generates revenue. \u201cYou do not want to be a single-product company in a platform war,\u201d she wrote.<\/p>\n<p>She also took shots at the company\u2019s leadership, claiming that Anthropic is \u201cbuilt on fear, restriction, and the idea that a small group of elites should control AI.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s an interesting narrative to come out of OpenAI, which hasn\u2019t exactly been immune to this type of posturing. Back when OpenAI launched, Altman specifically said, \u201cI sleep better knowing I can have some influence now.\u201d In recent years, the company has spent much of its lobbying money to fight federal regulations that would put guardrails on its products. Kinda seems like the objection isn\u2019t so much about a small group of elites controlling AI and more about who\u2019s in the group.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n<div class=\"entry-content prose dark:prose-invert lg:prose-xl prose-main dark:prose-main\">\n<p>Over the weekend, OpenAI\u2019s chief new revenue officer, Denise Dresser, sent a memo to employees meant to detail the company\u2019s strategy going forward, but somehow ended up spending a considerable amount of ink on how little the company thinks of Anthropic. The memo, reported on by The Verge, included some direct shots at OpenAI\u2019s biggest rival, including claiming that Anthropic has been juicing its revenue figures.<\/p>\n<p>Per the memo, Dresser claimed that Anthropic uses \u201caccounting treatment that makes revenue look bigger than it is,\u201d and that has given a false impression of how long the company\u2019s run rate is. Just last week, Bloomberg reported Anthropic\u2019s annualized revenue is trending over $30 billion. OpenAI is throwing cold water on that, claiming that it believes Anthropic is overstating its situation by about $8 billion, dropping it to $22 billion. And wouldn\u2019t you know it, that puts Anthropic behind OpenAI, which has a reported run rate of around $24 billion.<\/p>\n<p>One of the objections that Dresser took with Anthropic\u2019s alleged revenue included \u201cgrossing up\u201d revenue-sharing agreements that the company has with Google and Amazon, instead of using net revenue figures.<\/p>\n<p>Funnily enough, though, part of the reason for Dresser\u2019s memo stems from OpenAI\u2019s own arrangement with Amazon. The giant online retailer just recently announced plans to invest up to $50 billion in OpenAI, which has given the firm new life as its status as a leader in the AI space slips away. In the memo, Dresser blamed OpenAI\u2019s partnership with Microsoft as a hurdle that \u201climited our ability to meet enterprises where they are.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With all that in mind, Dresser seems to believe that OpenAI still compares favorably in terms of its position in the market compared to rival Anthropic. While she acknowledged that Anthropic has a significant lead among enterprise customers thanks to its advantage in coding, she believes it\u2019s a tactical error for Anthropic to make a point of emphasis that its service actually generates revenue. \u201cYou do not want to be a single-product company in a platform war,\u201d she wrote.<\/p>\n<p>She also took shots at the company\u2019s leadership, claiming that Anthropic is \u201cbuilt on fear, restriction, and the idea that a small group of elites should control AI.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s an interesting narrative to come out of OpenAI, which hasn\u2019t exactly been immune to this type of posturing. Back when OpenAI launched, Altman specifically said, \u201cI sleep better knowing I can have some influence now.\u201d In recent years, the company has spent much of its lobbying money to fight federal regulations that would put guardrails on its products. Kinda seems like the objection isn\u2019t so much about a small group of elites controlling AI and more about who\u2019s in the group.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>[analyse_source url=&#8221;https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/openai-exec-reveals-new-strategy-in-leaked-memo-attack-anthropic-2000745872&#8243;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[analyse_image type=&#8221;featured&#8221; src=&#8221;https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/app\/uploads\/2026\/02\/altman-impact-1200&#215;675.jpg&#8221;] Over the weekend, OpenAI\u2019s chief new revenue officer, Denise Dresser, sent a memo to employees meant to detail the company\u2019s strategy going forward, but somehow ended up spending a considerable amount of ink on how little the company thinks of Anthropic. The memo, reported on by The Verge, included some direct shots [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[226,53],"class_list":["post-1883111","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","tag-crawlmanager","tag-gizmodo-com"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1883111","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1883111"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1883111\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1883111"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1883111"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1883111"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}