{"id":1880439,"date":"2026-04-13T15:30:42","date_gmt":"2026-04-13T12:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1880439"},"modified":"2026-04-13T15:30:42","modified_gmt":"2026-04-13T12:30:42","slug":"the-meta-brand-is-not-something-people-want-to-put-anywhere-near-their-face-says-snapchat-ceo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1880439","title":{"rendered":"\u2018The Meta Brand Is Not Something People Want to Put Anywhere Near Their Face,\u2019 Says Snapchat CEO"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[analyse_image type=&#8221;featured&#8221; src=&#8221;https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/app\/uploads\/2026\/04\/evanspiegel-snapchat-glasses-1-1200&#215;675.jpg&#8221;]<\/p>\n<article class=\"post-2000745652 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-gadgets tag-meta-ray-bans tag-smart-glasses tag-snap\">\n<div class=\"entry-content prose dark:prose-invert lg:prose-xl prose-main dark:prose-main\">\n<p>Lawmakers and advocacy groups aren\u2019t the only people with strong thoughts about Meta\u2019s smart glasses. Apparently, Snap CEO, Evan Spiegel, has some opinions, too. In an interview with YouTuber David Senra, Spiegel had some choice words about Meta\u2019s reputation in the space. Spoiler alert: he\u2019s not a huge fan.<\/p>\n<div class=\"od-wrapper od-wrapper-both  od-background\">\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Mobile_Pos1\" class=\"Mobile_Pos1 od-mobile\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Content_1\" class=\"Content_1 od-desktop\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s much more harmful for [Essilor]Luxottica than it is for Meta. I think Meta needed to partner with Luxottica because the Meta brand is not something that people want to put anywhere near their face,\u201d Spiegel said. \u201cI think that Meta really needed [the partnership].\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"not-prose my-8 -mx-5 xs:max-w-xs xs:mx-auto\"><\/div>\n<p>Spiegel also forecasted the partnership as potentially ill-fated for EssilorLuxottica, the maker of Ray-Bans, which, of course, teamed up with Meta to make its Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses and the Meta Ray-Ban Display.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Evan Spiegel talks Snap Spectales vs. Meta Raybans.<\/p>\n<p>Feels a vertically-integrated approach targeting higher end (eg. Tesla with Roadster, Apple with iPhone) is the move for smart glasses. <\/p>\n<p>Also, says brand association is risky for Luxxotica:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it\u2019s much more harmful for\u2026 https:\/\/t.co\/tOx4LTpX6Q pic.twitter.com\/LqOBbVz05T<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Bearly AI (@bearlyai) April 12, 2026<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\u201cWhat\u2019s challenging for Luxottica is that they took like the most iconic, crazy-high-margin product and they destroyed the margin and then they associated with Meta,\u201d Spiegel said. \u201cWe\u2019ll see if that pans out over time, if that was the right brand choice for them, but I can definitely see why Meta needs to camouflage their brand, which I think a lot of people don\u2019t resonate with and don\u2019t like.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"od-wrapper od-wrapper-both  od-background\">\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Mobile_Pos2\" class=\"Mobile_Pos2 od-mobile\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Content_2\" class=\"Content_2 od-desktop\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>On one hand, Spiegel isn\u2019t wrong. Meta, to no one\u2019s surprise, seems to be actively trying to torch the reputation of its semi-successful smart glasses, either through collecting and mishandling user data or through its nightmarish potential plans to add facial recognition\u2014both of which are privacy landmines in their own right. By most metrics, Meta\u2019s presence in the smart glasses world is becoming an increasingly toxic one, and that\u2019s not even counting the fact that lots of people are averse to putting cameras and AI in glasses at a fundamental level, regardless of privacy practices or nuance.<\/p>\n<div class=\"od-wrapper od-wrapper-both  od-background\">\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Mobile_Pos3\" class=\"Mobile_Pos3 od-mobile\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Content_3\" class=\"Content_3 od-desktop\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_2000613827\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2000613827\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2000613827\" src=\"https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/app\/uploads\/2025\/06\/snapspecs2.jpg\" alt=\"Snap Specs AR glasses.\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1280\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2000613827\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Snapchat\u2019s latest Specs AR glasses aren\u2019t exactly fashionable. \u00a9 Snap<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>On the other hand, Snap hasn\u2019t been particularly successful in its own endeavors on the AR glasses\/smart glasses front. Spectacles, Snap\u2019s AR glasses, have been around for quite some time, but are still pretty unwieldy and big. The latest generation is also still just for developers and creators, which isn\u2019t exactly a glowing endorsement of its own success in the space, nor is it an indicator that people are itching to wear smart glasses made by Snap on their faces.<\/p>\n<p>Even without having major success of its own, though, Spiegel isn\u2019t wrong. There\u2019s a reason why the Ray-Ban name has traditionally taken precedent over Meta\u2019s in Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses, and it\u2019s not Meta being generous. Whether the partnership will blow up in EssilorLuxottica\u2019s face is too early to tell, though. Meta has sold a surprising amount of smart glasses so far, but competition from Google, Samsung, and maybe even Apple looms large. In the meantime, Meta is making itself a pretty big punching bag, and plenty of other names in the space are content to take their swing.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/article>\n<div class=\"entry-content prose dark:prose-invert lg:prose-xl prose-main dark:prose-main\">\n<p>Lawmakers and advocacy groups aren\u2019t the only people with strong thoughts about Meta\u2019s smart glasses. Apparently, Snap CEO, Evan Spiegel, has some opinions, too. In an interview with YouTuber David Senra, Spiegel had some choice words about Meta\u2019s reputation in the space. Spoiler alert: he\u2019s not a huge fan.<\/p>\n<div class=\"od-wrapper od-wrapper-both  od-background\">\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Mobile_Pos1\" class=\"Mobile_Pos1 od-mobile\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Content_1\" class=\"Content_1 od-desktop\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s much more harmful for [Essilor]Luxottica than it is for Meta. I think Meta needed to partner with Luxottica because the Meta brand is not something that people want to put anywhere near their face,\u201d Spiegel said. \u201cI think that Meta really needed [the partnership].\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"not-prose my-8 -mx-5 xs:max-w-xs xs:mx-auto\"><\/div>\n<p>Spiegel also forecasted the partnership as potentially ill-fated for EssilorLuxottica, the maker of Ray-Bans, which, of course, teamed up with Meta to make its Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses and the Meta Ray-Ban Display.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Evan Spiegel talks Snap Spectales vs. Meta Raybans.<\/p>\n<p>Feels a vertically-integrated approach targeting higher end (eg. Tesla with Roadster, Apple with iPhone) is the move for smart glasses. <\/p>\n<p>Also, says brand association is risky for Luxxotica:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it\u2019s much more harmful for\u2026 https:\/\/t.co\/tOx4LTpX6Q pic.twitter.com\/LqOBbVz05T<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Bearly AI (@bearlyai) April 12, 2026<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\u201cWhat\u2019s challenging for Luxottica is that they took like the most iconic, crazy-high-margin product and they destroyed the margin and then they associated with Meta,\u201d Spiegel said. \u201cWe\u2019ll see if that pans out over time, if that was the right brand choice for them, but I can definitely see why Meta needs to camouflage their brand, which I think a lot of people don\u2019t resonate with and don\u2019t like.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"od-wrapper od-wrapper-both  od-background\">\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Mobile_Pos2\" class=\"Mobile_Pos2 od-mobile\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Content_2\" class=\"Content_2 od-desktop\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>On one hand, Spiegel isn\u2019t wrong. Meta, to no one\u2019s surprise, seems to be actively trying to torch the reputation of its semi-successful smart glasses, either through collecting and mishandling user data or through its nightmarish potential plans to add facial recognition\u2014both of which are privacy landmines in their own right. By most metrics, Meta\u2019s presence in the smart glasses world is becoming an increasingly toxic one, and that\u2019s not even counting the fact that lots of people are averse to putting cameras and AI in glasses at a fundamental level, regardless of privacy practices or nuance.<\/p>\n<div class=\"od-wrapper od-wrapper-both  od-background\">\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Mobile_Pos3\" class=\"Mobile_Pos3 od-mobile\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"optidigital-adslot-Content_3\" class=\"Content_3 od-desktop\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_2000613827\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2000613827\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2000613827\" src=\"https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/app\/uploads\/2025\/06\/snapspecs2.jpg\" alt=\"Snap Specs AR glasses.\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1280\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2000613827\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Snapchat\u2019s latest Specs AR glasses aren\u2019t exactly fashionable. \u00a9 Snap<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>On the other hand, Snap hasn\u2019t been particularly successful in its own endeavors on the AR glasses\/smart glasses front. Spectacles, Snap\u2019s AR glasses, have been around for quite some time, but are still pretty unwieldy and big. The latest generation is also still just for developers and creators, which isn\u2019t exactly a glowing endorsement of its own success in the space, nor is it an indicator that people are itching to wear smart glasses made by Snap on their faces.<\/p>\n<p>Even without having major success of its own, though, Spiegel isn\u2019t wrong. There\u2019s a reason why the Ray-Ban name has traditionally taken precedent over Meta\u2019s in Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses, and it\u2019s not Meta being generous. Whether the partnership will blow up in EssilorLuxottica\u2019s face is too early to tell, though. Meta has sold a surprising amount of smart glasses so far, but competition from Google, Samsung, and maybe even Apple looms large. In the meantime, Meta is making itself a pretty big punching bag, and plenty of other names in the space are content to take their swing.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>[analyse_source url=&#8221;https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/the-meta-brand-is-not-something-people-want-to-put-anywhere-near-their-face-says-snapchat-ceo-2000745652&#8243;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[analyse_image type=&#8221;featured&#8221; src=&#8221;https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/app\/uploads\/2026\/04\/evanspiegel-snapchat-glasses-1-1200&#215;675.jpg&#8221;] Lawmakers and advocacy groups aren\u2019t the only people with strong thoughts about Meta\u2019s smart glasses. Apparently, Snap CEO, Evan Spiegel, has some opinions, too. In an interview with YouTuber David Senra, Spiegel had some choice words about Meta\u2019s reputation in the space. Spoiler alert: he\u2019s not a huge fan. \u201cIt\u2019s much more [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[226,53],"class_list":["post-1880439","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","tag-crawlmanager","tag-gizmodo-com"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1880439","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1880439"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1880439\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1880439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1880439"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1880439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}