{"id":1802139,"date":"2026-03-02T16:31:37","date_gmt":"2026-03-02T13:31:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1802139"},"modified":"2026-03-02T16:31:37","modified_gmt":"2026-03-02T13:31:37","slug":"olympics-why-olympic-snowboard-scores-sparked-debate-and-how-judging-could-soon-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1802139","title":{"rendered":"[OLYMPICS] Why Olympic Snowboard Scores Sparked Debate\u2014and How Judging Could Soon Change"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"Su\"Su
Slopestyle snowboarding was one of the 2026 Olympics\u2019 most talked-about events, with China\u2019s Su Yiming (pictured above) taking gold in the men\u2019s division. | Credit: CGTN Sports Scene Facebook<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

At the 2026 Milano Cortina Winter Olympics, freestyle snowboarding emerged as one of the Games\u2019 most talked-about events, drawing attention not only to the sport itself but also to the results. <\/strong>To the viewer, some results seemed obvious, while others left them scratching their heads. In the wake of the Games, many are now questioning the way snowboarding is judged, what the scoring criteria are, and how judging will look in the future.<\/p>\n

The conversation about scoring mainly stems from the women\u2019s slopestyle final, where Japan\u2019s Mari Fukada took gold, followed closely by New Zealand\u2019s Zoi Sadowski-Synott, who took silver.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"2026\"2026
Zoi Sadowski-Synott (left), Mari Fukada (middle), and Kokomo Murase (right) smile on the women\u2019s snowboard slopestyle podium. | Credit: CGTN Sports Scene Facebook<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Fukada\u2019s run\u00a0featured a switch 1260 (three and a half rotations), followed by two 720s (two rotations).\u00a0<\/strong>This run would propel her into first place with a score of 87.83, giving her Olympic gold. Sadowski-Synott\u2019s run included a switch backside 900 (three and a half rotations) and two 1080s (three rotations), landing her in second place with a score of 87.48.<\/p>\n

This is where the controversy began.\u00a0<\/strong>At face value, Sadowski-Synott\u2019s run featured two larger spins, while Fukada\u2019s run featured one. This led many to question why Fukada run outscored Sadowski-Synott\u2019s. People wanted the judges to answer, and they did.<\/p>\n

In an interview conducted by Whitelines Magazine<\/a><\/em>, judges Gaz Vogen and Adam Begg explained the scores that the riders were given and what judges are looking for in competition.\u00a0<\/strong>In the interview, Vogen emphasized Fukada\u2019s execution, while Begg explained what the judges wanted to see.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe key point with Mari\u2019s run was it was absolutely flawless execution,\u201d Vogen said in the interview.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Begg explained that judges wanted to see riders spinning in all directions. <\/strong>In snowboarding, riders can spin in four different directions: frontside, backside, switch frontside, and switch backside. Fukada had included each direction in her run, earning her the highest score of the contest.<\/p>\n

\"Mari\"Mari
Japan\u2019s Mari Fukada smiles after putting down a run in women\u2019s snowboard slopestyle. Fukada would go on to win gold. | Credit: Oakley Snowboarding Facebook<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

The judges\u2019 verdict was recently put to the test by the X Games\u2019 Owl A.I., an artificial intelligence used to assist in freestyle scoring. <\/strong>The result of the A.I. flipped podium placement, putting Sadowski-Synott in first place and Fukada in second. The program explained that the judges did not take progression into account enough, as 1080s are considered a progressive trick.<\/p>\n

The X Games, led by CEO Jeremy Bloom, recently introduced A.I. to assist with judging events in 2025. <\/strong>Despite using A.I., the final say on scores was up to humans.<\/p>\n