{"id":1763198,"date":"2026-02-11T11:05:28","date_gmt":"2026-02-11T08:05:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1763198"},"modified":"2026-02-11T11:05:28","modified_gmt":"2026-02-11T08:05:28","slug":"impozitul-auto-majorat-artificial-la-buzau-cu-47-sub-pretextul-legea-ne-obliga-ce-spune-legea-de-fapt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1763198","title":{"rendered":"Impozitul auto, majorat artificial la Buz\u0103u cu 47%, sub pretextul \u201elegea ne oblig\u0103\u201d. Ce spune legea, de fapt!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[analyse_image type=&#8221;featured&#8221; src=&#8221;https:\/\/gazetabuzoiana.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/images-3.jpg&#8221;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"entry-content entry clearfix\">\n<p>\u00cen \u0219edin\u021ba de Consiliu Local Municipal, din 29 decembrie 2025, conducerea Prim\u0103riei a lansat o tez\u0103 care a devenit rapid \u201escutul\u201d administra\u021biei \u00een fa\u021ba furiei contribuabililor:\u00a0<em>legea ne oblig\u0103<\/em>. \u0218i a\u0219a a uniformizat plata taxei auto la toate autoturismele, indifernet de capacitatea cilindric\u0103. Situa\u021bia a fost constatat\u0103 ulterior, la ghi\u0219ee, de c\u0103tre contribuabilii care s-au priceput s\u0103 confrunte textul hot\u0103r\u00e2rii cu cel al legii. Potrivit autorit\u0103\u021bilor, noua formul\u0103 guvernamental\u0103 de calcul ar fi sc\u0103zut impozitul pentru motoarele de peste 2.000 cmc, iar Prim\u0103ria ar fi fost \u201efor\u021bat\u0103\u201d s\u0103 majoreze taxele pentru toate ma\u0219inile (inclusiv cele mici) pentru a nu sc\u0103dea nivelul \u00eencas\u0103rilor sub cel al anului anterior.<\/p>\n<p>Analiza textului de lege\u00a0Legea nr. 227\/2015 privind Codul Fiscal\u00a0arat\u0103 \u00eens\u0103 c\u0103 aceast\u0103 \u201eobliga\u021bie\u201d este o confuzie grav\u0103 \u00eentre bunurile mobile \u0219i cele imobile. <\/p>\n<p>Legiuitorul a distins clar regimul cl\u0103dirilor de cel al vehiculelor, dar administra\u021bia din Buz\u0103u a ales s\u0103 le amestece:<\/p>\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Pentru CL\u0102DIRI:<\/strong>\u00a0\u00centr-adev\u0103r,\u00a0Art. 457 alin. (1^1) din Codul Fiscal\u00a0stipuleaz\u0103 c\u0103 impozitul nu poate fi mai mic dec\u00e2t cel din anul precedent.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Pentru AUTO:<\/strong>\u00a0La\u00a0Art. 470 (Impozitul pe mijloacele de transport),\u00a0<strong>NU EXIST\u0102<\/strong>\u00a0nicio interdic\u021bie de sc\u0103dere a taxei \u0219i nicio obliga\u021bie de compensare.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Practic, s-a extins nepermis o regul\u0103 strict\u0103 de la imobiliare la autoturisme. Primarul a prezentat o\u00a0op\u021biune administrativ\u0103\u00a0drept o\u00a0obliga\u021bie legal\u0103, induc\u00e2nd \u00een eroare consilierii locali care au votat proiectul sub premisa c\u0103 \u201enu exist\u0103 alt\u0103 cale\u201d. Asta \u00eenseamn\u0103 o majorare de  47% a taxei.<\/p>\n<p>De\u0219i cota adi\u021bional\u0103 este  l\u0103sat\u0103 la latitudinea UAT-urilor, la Buz\u0103u aceasta a fost aplicat\u0103 la pragul de 47%, invoc\u00e2nd eronat necesitatea de a \u201erepara\u201d ceea ce Guvernul a modificat. Rezultatul? Proprietarii de ma\u0219ini mici pl\u0103tesc suplimentar pentru a acoperi o gaur\u0103 bugetar\u0103 imaginar\u0103, creat\u0103 printr-o interpretare for\u021bat\u0103 a legii.<\/p>\n<p>P\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een acest moment, nicio voce din opozi\u021bie sau din aparatul tehnic al Prim\u0103riei nu a explicat de ce s-a aplicat analogia legii acolo unde Codul Fiscal este explicit, iar banii r\u0103m\u00e2n \u00een bugetul local.<\/p>\n<p>Dincolo de cifre, \u00eens\u0103, asist\u0103m la o strategie de comunicare bazat\u0103 pe o omisiune grav\u0103 a adev\u0103rului legislativ:\u00a0majorarea cu 47% a taxelor nu este o obliga\u021bie impus\u0103 de Bucure\u0219ti, ci o alegere politic\u0103 local\u0103. Argumentul principal oferit de administra\u021bia local\u0103 este c\u0103 \u201elegea trebuie respectat\u0103\u201d. Nimic mai adev\u0103rat, \u00eens\u0103 legea invocat\u0103 \u2014\u00a0<strong>Art. 489 alin. (1) din Codul Fiscal<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 este clar\u0103:<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201eAutoritatea deliberativ\u0103 a administra\u021biei publice locale\u00a0poate majora\u00a0impozitele \u0219i taxele locale (\u2026) cu p\u00e2n\u0103 la 50%.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Alte prim\u0103rii din \u021bar\u0103 au ales s\u0103 aplice doar formula de calcul standard prev\u0103zut\u0103 de lege, f\u0103r\u0103 cota adi\u021bional\u0103. Dac\u0103 logica munbicipalit\u0103\u021bii ar fi corect\u0103 \u2014 anume c\u0103 ad\u0103ugarea celor 47% este obligatorie pentru a \u201erespecta legea\u201d \u2014  asta ar \u00eensemna c\u0103 toate prim\u0103riile care nu au aplicat aceast\u0103 majorare \u00eencalc\u0103 legea \u00een acest moment. Ceea ce este absurd.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen realitate, diferen\u021ba de sute de lei la impozitul aceleia\u0219i ma\u0219ini \u00eentre Buz\u0103u \u0219i alte localit\u0103\u021bi nu vine dintr-o directiv\u0103 guvernamental\u0103, ci din\u00a0voin\u021ba politic\u0103 a Primarului \u0219i a Consiliului Local.<\/p>\n<p>Se \u00eencearc\u0103 justificarea acestei presiuni fiscale prin\u00a0<strong>Legea 273\/2006 privind finan\u021bele publice locale (art. 14, alin. 7)<\/strong>, care oblig\u0103 prim\u0103riile cu un grad sc\u0103zut de colectare a veniturilor s\u0103 nu bugeteze mai mult dec\u00e2t au realizat \u00een anul precedent. Potrivit speciali\u0219tilor, aceast\u0103 regul\u0103 se refer\u0103 la\u00a0fundamentarea veniturilor, nu oblig\u0103 sub nicio form\u0103 la aplicarea cotei maxime de impozitare asupra cet\u0103\u021benilor.<\/p>\n<p>Prim\u0103ria a primit mai multe sesiz\u0103ri \u0219i peti\u021bii prin care buzoienii contest\u0103 modul de calcul \u0219i cuantumul taxelor pentru 2026, iar contribuabilii spun c\u0103 nu se vor opri aici. Ei sunt deci\u0219i s\u0103 se adreseze instan\u021belor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti, imediat dup\u0103 ce vor primi r\u0103spunsurile oficiale de la Prim\u0103rie.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery has-nested-images columns-default is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"743\" height=\"1024\" data-id=\"18123\" src=\"https:\/\/gazetabuzoiana.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1-743x1024.jpg\" alt class=\"wp-image-18123\"><\/figure>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"707\" height=\"1024\" data-id=\"18124\" src=\"https:\/\/gazetabuzoiana.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/2-707x1024.jpg\" alt class=\"wp-image-18124\"><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\">\n<div class=\"post-bottom-meta post-bottom-tags post-tags-modern\">\n<div class=\"post-bottom-meta-title\"> Etichete<\/div>\n<p><span class=\"tagcloud\"><a href=\"https:\/\/gazetabuzoiana.ro\/tag\/clm\/\" rel=\"tag\">CLM<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/gazetabuzoiana.ro\/tag\/codul-fiscal\/\" rel=\"tag\">codul fiscal<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/gazetabuzoiana.ro\/tag\/impozit-cladiri\/\" rel=\"tag\">impozit cladiri<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/gazetabuzoiana.ro\/tag\/primaria-buzau-2\/\" rel=\"tag\">primaria Buzau<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/gazetabuzoiana.ro\/tag\/taxa-auto\/\" rel=\"tag\">taxa auto<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>[analyse_source url=&#8221;https:\/\/gazetabuzoiana.ro\/2026\/02\/11\/impozitul-auto-a-fost-majorat-artificial-la-buzau-sub-pretextul-legea-ne-obliga-ce-spune-de-fapt-legea\/&#8221;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[analyse_image type=&#8221;featured&#8221; src=&#8221;https:\/\/gazetabuzoiana.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/images-3.jpg&#8221;] \u00cen \u0219edin\u021ba de Consiliu Local Municipal, din 29 decembrie 2025, conducerea Prim\u0103riei a lansat o tez\u0103 care a devenit rapid \u201escutul\u201d administra\u021biei \u00een fa\u021ba furiei contribuabililor:\u00a0legea ne oblig\u0103. \u0218i a\u0219a a uniformizat plata taxei auto la toate autoturismele, indifernet de capacitatea cilindric\u0103. Situa\u021bia a fost constatat\u0103 ulterior, la ghi\u0219ee, de c\u0103tre contribuabilii [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[226,38],"class_list":["post-1763198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","tag-crawlmanager","tag-gazetabuzoiana-ro"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1763198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1763198"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1763198\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1763198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1763198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1763198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}