{"id":140658,"date":"2017-05-31T14:25:42","date_gmt":"2017-05-31T11:25:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=140658"},"modified":"2017-05-31T14:25:42","modified_gmt":"2017-05-31T11:25:42","slug":"infrangere-a-parlamentului-la-ccr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=140658","title":{"rendered":"\u00cenfr\u00e2ngere a Parlamentului la CCR"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Magistra\u021bii Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale au decis c\u0103 deputa\u021bii au \u00eenc\u0103lcat principiul bicameralismului c\u00e2nd au decis s\u0103 aduc\u0103 modific\u0103ri suplimentare la Codul de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103 folosindu-se de o ordonan\u021b\u0103 de urgen\u021b\u0103 adoptat\u0103 de Guvernul Ciolo\u0219. Deloc \u00eent\u00e2mpl\u0103tor, modific\u0103rile aduse se refer\u0103 la noi cazuri \u00een care se poate cere revizuirea unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri definitive a instan\u021bei, iar \u00een enumerare au prins ale\u0219ii \u0219i situa\u021bia \u00een care, dup\u0103 pronun\u021barea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii definitive, sunt declarate neconstitu\u021bionale prevederile \u00een baza c\u0103rora a fost emis\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea.<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a fost sesizat\u0103 de \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie, dup\u0103 ce Camera Deputa\u021bilor a aprobat, cu numeroase modific\u0103ri, Ordonan\u021ba de Urgen\u021b\u0103 nr. 95\/2016<\/strong>, adoptat\u0103 de Guvernul Ciolo\u0219 \u00een sensul prorog\u0103rii unor termene din Legea nr. 134\/2010 privind Codul de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103. CCR a dat, miercuri, c\u00e2\u0219tig de cauz\u0103 ICCJ, stabilind c\u0103 deputa\u021bii au \u00eenc\u0103lcat principiul bicameralismului<\/strong> c\u00e2nd au adus textului modific\u0103ri semnificative fa\u021b\u0103 de forma venit\u0103 de la Senat. \u00cen plus, prin modific\u0103rile operate, deputa\u021bii s-au \u00eendep\u0103rtat substan\u021bial de obiectivele urm\u0103rite de ini\u021biator<\/strong>, adic\u0103 de Executiv.<\/p>\n

\u00cen sesizarea depus\u0103 la CCR, ICCJ a sus\u021binut c\u0103 noile cazuri de revizuire a hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti introduse de Camera Deputa\u021bilor \u201eau ca efect repunerea \u00een discu\u0163ie a unui num\u0103r semnificativ de hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u015fti care au dob\u00e2ndit autoritate de lucru judecat\u201d. \u00cen plus, s-ar transforma calea extraordinar\u0103 de atac \u00eentr-o veritabil\u0103 cale ordinar\u0103 de atac, \u00eentr-un \u201eapel deghizat\u201d<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Fa\u021b\u0103 de forma OUG 95 \u0219i forma adoptat\u0103 de Senat, Camera Deputa\u021bilor a introdus patru noi situa\u021bii \u00een care se poate cere revizuirea hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor definitive<\/a>:<\/p>\n

– c\u00e2nd, dup\u0103 pronun\u021barea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii definitive, Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 adopt\u0103 o decizie prin care se declar\u0103 ca fiind neconstitu\u021bionale dispozi\u021biile legale pe care s-a \u00eentemeiat hot\u0103r\u00e2rea definitiv\u0103<\/strong>, sau ale c\u0103rei considerente \u0219i\/sau dispozitiv sunt contrare hot\u0103r\u00e2rii definitive (amendamente formulat de deputat PNL Vasile Varga);<\/p>\n

– hot\u0103r\u00e2rea este pronun\u021bat\u0103 cu \u00eenc\u0103lcarea prevederilor constitu\u021bionale, chiar dac\u0103 aspectul de ordine public\u0103 nu a fost invocat \u00een fa\u021ba instan\u021belor judec\u0103tore\u0219ti (amendament formulat de deputa\u021bii PSD din Comisia juridic\u0103);<\/p>\n

– hot\u0103r\u00e2rea este pronun\u021bat\u0103 cu nerespectarea dispozi\u021biilor deciziilor Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, precum \u0219i a considerentelor acestora (amendament formulat de deputatul PNL Vasile Varga);<\/p>\n

– c\u00e2nd hot\u0103r\u00e2rea este nelegal\u0103 pronun\u021b\u00e2nd sanc\u021biuni \u00een temeiul unor dispozi\u021bii legale care nu erau \u00een vigoare la data la care s-a n\u0103scut raportul juridic dedus judec\u0103\u021bii (amendament formulat de deputa\u021bii PSD din Comisia juridic\u0103).<\/p>\n

Toate aceste modific\u0103ri aduse OUG 95\/2016 au fost aprobate de plenul Camerei Deputa\u021bilor \u00een \u0219edin\u021ba din 9 mai 2017. Au votat \u00een favoarea modific\u0103rilor deputa\u021bii PSD, UDMR, ALDE, PMP \u0219i ai minorit\u0103\u021bilor, s-au opus cei de la USR \u0219i PNL (cu excep\u021bia a trei deputa\u021bi, care s-au ab\u021binut).<\/p>\n

La dezbaterile generale<\/a>, singurul deputat care a pledat pentru respingerea amendamentelor venite de la Comisia juridic\u0103 a fost deputatul USR Stelian Cristian Ion. \u201eLa Comisia juridic\u0103, s-au adoptat ni\u015fte amendamente cu care nu suntem de acord. Este vorba de amendamentele din anex\u0103, (…) prin care se adaug\u0103, \u00eendep\u0103rt\u00e2ndu-se de la ideea ini\u0163ial\u0103 a proiectului de lege, se adaug\u0103 mai multe motive de revizuire, prin aceasta \u00eenc\u0103lc\u00e2ndu-se principiul stabilit\u0103\u0163ii circuitului juridic civil. (…) Mai mult dec\u00e2t at\u00e2t, consider\u0103m c\u0103 unele dintre aceste noi motive de revizuire \u00eencalc\u0103 flagrant Constitu\u0163ia\u201d, a sus\u021binut acesta.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Source URL: https:\/\/www.digi24.ro\/stiri\/actualitate\/politica\/infrangere-a-parlamentului-la-ccr-734906<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Magistra\u021bii Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale au decis c\u0103 deputa\u021bii au \u00eenc\u0103lcat principiul bicameralismului c\u00e2nd au decis s\u0103 aduc\u0103 modific\u0103ri suplimentare la Codul de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103 folosindu-se de o ordonan\u021b\u0103 de urgen\u021b\u0103 adoptat\u0103 de Guvernul Ciolo\u0219. Deloc \u00eent\u00e2mpl\u0103tor, modific\u0103rile aduse se refer\u0103 la noi cazuri \u00een care se poate cere revizuirea unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri definitive a instan\u021bei, iar \u00een […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":140659,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[11],"class_list":["post-140658","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","tag-digi24"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=140658"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140658\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/140659"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=140658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=140658"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=140658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}