{"id":1398252,"date":"2026-01-08T20:42:40","date_gmt":"2026-01-08T17:42:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1398252"},"modified":"2026-01-08T20:42:40","modified_gmt":"2026-01-08T17:42:40","slug":"is-the-new-armani-luminous-silk-foundation-even-better-than-the-original-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1398252","title":{"rendered":"Is the New Armani Luminous Silk Foundation Even Better Than the Original? | Review"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
RE-DEW<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Is the New Armani Luminous Silk Foundation Even Better Than the Original?<\/h1>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Six Allure<\/em> editors put it to the test.<\/div>\n
\n
\n
By <\/span>Dianna Singh<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n

\n
\n
<\/p>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Courtesy of Armani Beauty; subjects<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

\u201cFeatherweight but ambitious, its fine particles blend effortlessly into the skin and erase red spots and shine,\u201d reads a caption in the December 2002 issue of Allure<\/em>. Said makeup artist Troy Surratt in our October 2008 edition: “It makes your skin look like you’re walking around under [photographer] Michael Thompson’s lighting.\u201d<\/p>\n

In both cases, the \u201cit\u201d in question is Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Foundation<\/strong>. And those glowing reviews are just two of dozens that have appeared in our IRL and virtual pages since the formula launched some 25 years ago. It was, simply put, a \u201cperfect foundation,\u201d says makeup artist Kirin Bhatty. Note the past tense: That\u2019s because, as of 2026, Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Foundation, as we once knew it, is no longer being produced.,<\/p>\n

When the Internet caught wind of the news, panic ensued (\u201cThis was my holy grail!\u201d exclaimed one Reddit user) and questions flew. But there was no need to fear: The beloved base isn\u2019t going away\u2014it\u2019s merely remerging after getting a facelift. And like all the most effective aesthetic interventions, the procedure was performed before there were too many obvious signs that it was needed: Bhatty, who is not formally affiliated with the brand, is one of many makeup artists we know who felt the easy-to-blend, ultra-lightweight, perfectly dewy original left little to be desired.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen reinventing such a beloved product, preserving these attributes is paramount,\u201d says Armani Beauty research and development specialist Rena Hayashi. \u201cWe achieved this through extensive trials and tests, meticulously ensuring that any advancements uphold these high standards.\u201d<\/p>\n

Those advancements, according to Hayashi, include a \u201csignificantly expanded and refined shade range.\u201d While the new formula is available in 44 shades, the OG came in a not-unimpressive 40. But the extra four shades aren\u2019t the difference-maker in and of themselves: Hayashi says the revamp was more about tweaking the existing tones. \u201cA new green pigment has allowed us to expand the shade range, particularly for those with olive undertones, providing a more accurate match,\u201d says Hayashi. \u201cAdditionally, a blue pigment was incorporated into our deeper shades, which helps to enhance luminosity and intensity in the makeup finish, crucially avoiding the ashiness that was previously an unmet need for individuals with deeper skin tones.\u201d<\/p>\n

The new foundation was also built to provide more skin-care benefits than the original: The formula includes ingredients like moisture-locking glycerin and brightening niacinamide. That\u2019s because today\u2019s consumers \u201cexpect foundations to be an extension of their skin-[care] routine,\u201d says Hayashi.<\/p>\n

Longtime devotees will also notice that the original frosted bottle has been traded for a shinier, sleeker version, though the sizes on offer (30ml and 18ml) and pricing ($69 and $48, respectively) remain the same.<\/p>\n

All that sounds well and good, but the question remains: Did the brand manage to clear the very high bar it set 25 years ago? For Bhatty, the answer is a resounding yes: \u201cThe new formula is just as beautiful, just as luminous, and just as trustworthy\u2014it performs on the red carpet and in real life flawlessly,\u201d she says, adding that she\u2019s also found the wear time to be longer than the original. \u201cOverall, I\u2019m so impressed\u2014and relieved!\u201d<\/p>\n

But what did our editors think? Scroll down for their reviews, including before and after images.<\/p>\n

Jesa Marie Calaor, senior beauty editor<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

Calaor before\u2026<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

\u2026and after.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\u201dIf you walked through the halls of Allure<\/em> in 2018\u2014when I’d first started working here\u2014and asked editors what foundation they’d recommend, most, if not all, would say the original Luminous Silk. The way it smoothed complexions and photographed was unmatched, and I’d use it on special occasions and events: I actually used my bottle of Luminous Silk on my friend when I did her makeup for her wedding. This new formula will likely garner the same reviews. It\u2019s so pigmented, lightweight, and creates a natural-looking, skin-like finish.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

I used shade 6.8\u2014described as \u2018medium tan, warm golden\u2019\u2014and pumped a drop of the liquid onto my face and spread it with a dense, slightly angled foundation brush. Three drops gave me a thin veil that helped hide some of the redness and discoloration on my very dry skin. For an event where I know I’ll be photographed, I’d apply more foundation to my face\u2014but not too much because a little goes such a long way. Best of all, I didn\u2019t need to touch it up at all.\u201d<\/p>\n

Edward Horgan, beauty closet associate<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

Horgan before\u2026<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

\u2026and after.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\u201cLuminous Silk has been a go-to of mine for years, not only for myself but also for doing makeup on other people. It was kind of the ultimate “your-skin-but-better” foundation that universally gave good coverage with a glowy, skin-like finish.<\/p>\n

I grabbed shade 3.75, a fair cool pink, in the new formula; I previously used 3.75 in the winter and 4.25 in the summer. This new shade was slightly a bit light for me, but after fully blending and using my other products, it matched very well.<\/p>\n

I would say the coverage is definitely on the lighter end, even a little lighter than the original. I could still see a couple imperfections poking through that I needed to cover with concealer, but I got a decent amount of coverage after the first layer, regardless. Similar to the old version, the lightweight formula means you don’t get that heavy makeup feel while wearing or after removing it. My skin felt fresh after removing it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Sarah Han, commerce editor<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

Han before\u2026<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

\u2026and after.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\u201cI found my shade\u20144, a \u2018light golden neutral\u2019\u2014on the first try, which rarely happens. I’m really glad the color you see in the bottle is an accurate representation of what it’ll look like swatched on your hand or face. Though it’s an existing shade, I do appreciate that this shade has a neutral undertone, since “golden” shades typically lean too warm for me.<\/p>\n

I usually reach for skin tints, and this consistency reminded me of one of my go-tos in the best way! Super spreadable, easy to blend, and just enough coverage to hide dark spots and redness. I started off with one pump for a sheer, all-over layer because I wanted to see how easily buildable it was. It’s definitely on the lighter side, but I went back in with a sponge to layer coverage on discoloration-prone areas, and the finish was smooth and beautiful.<\/p>\n

I couldn’t feel it at all sitting on my skin, from application to removal. I didn’t feel like I had to rigorously melt it off with my oil cleanser, either, so my skin still felt soft post-rinse.\u201d<\/p>\n

Alessandra Foresto, managing editor<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

Foresto before\u2026<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

\u2026and after using the new formula.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

\u2026and after using the original formula.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

“I love the original foundation for its ability to smooth and hide imperfections while not looking cakey and heavy. This thing is pricey, though, so I bought a mini only to test it. I used shade 7.8 (\u2018medium tan, warm olive\u2019) on both the original and new versions.<\/p>\n

I do think this new formulation looks more natural on my skin: I always thought the other formula looked a little too dark on me, but I did not feel the same with this new one. I applied it both with a Beautyblender sponge\u2014my preferred way of applying foundation\u2014and a brush. In both cases, the formula blended easily and offered a good amount of coverage without feeling thick or matte. It looks natural, but like it improved my skin a bit.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

The foundation stayed on pretty impeccably through the day. I sometimes need to touch up around my lips post-meals and coffee, but that was not the case this time! I have pretty reactive skin (eczema that leads to dark spots and inflammation), so I\u2019m always afraid foundations will make my skin dry. I had nothing to worry about here, though.\u201d<\/p>\n

Briana Rengifo, designer<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

Rengifo before\u2026<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

\u2026and after.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

“I think the change in the shades helped balance out my fair-leaning olive skin: 6.25 is a medium, warm peach..<\/p>\n

I used a brush to apply it and would describe the texture as satin-feeling and very hydrating. The cover was medium, but it can easily be built up\u2014and even when I applied a couple layers, it didn\u2019t feel like I was wearing foundation. Plus, I feel like it made my skin look a little more plump.<\/p>\n

I did break out a bit after wearing it for the weekend\u2014of course, it could’ve been something else, but I tend to be sensitive to foundations. I would say to be careful if you are acne-prone, but I’ll continue to use it for special occasions.”<\/p>\n

Hannah Brower, content manager, Allure Beauty Box<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

Brower before\u2026<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

\n
\"Image<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n

\u2026and after.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Courtesy of subject<\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\u201cThe original Luminous Silk was one of my very first favorite foundations\u2014I repurchased it time and time again because it gave my skin the radiant, light-to-medium coverage I was seeking. For years, during every Sephora sale, it was always at the top of my list for a restock.<\/p>\n

I\u2019d always used shade 3 in the original, but grabbed shade 2\u2014described as fair neutral golden\u2014in the new formula. Thinking back, the original formula in shade 3 was a tiny bit yellow for me, and I did notice that the new formula seems more neutralized. Plus, there was zero oxidation!<\/p>\n

After applying with a sponge, I wore this for a night out, and after many, many hours, my makeup still looked flawless. The foundation didn’t separate, slip, or feel heavy at all. I have acne-prone skin, and products can easily cause breakouts, but thankfully, I didn’t notice any blemishes in the days following.<\/p>\n

I absolutely love the new formula\u2014even more than the original\u2014though I will miss the classic frosted glass bottle. That said, this launch has reignited my love for Luminous Silk, and it will likely become my new go-to.\u201d<\/p>\n

Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Foundation retails for $69\/30ml and is available now at Sephora and Sephora.com.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

Read more product reviews:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  • 13 Chanel Beauty Products Allure<\/em> Editors Adore<\/li>\n
  • Celebrity Makeup Artist Hung Vanngo Has Created the Perfect Red Lipstick<\/li>\n
  • 8 Best Drugstore Eye Creams That Deliver Results You Can See<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n

    Source URL: https:\/\/www.allure.com\/story\/armani-beauty-luminous-silk-foundation-reformulation-review-2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    RE-DEW Is the New Armani Luminous Silk Foundation Even Better Than the Original? Six Allure editors put it to the test. By Dianna Singh January 8, 2026 Courtesy of Armani Beauty; subjects \u201cFeatherweight but ambitious, its fine particles blend effortlessly into the skin and erase red spots and shine,\u201d reads a caption in the December […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[52],"class_list":["post-1398252","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","tag-allure-com"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1398252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1398252"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1398252\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1398252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1398252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1398252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}