{"id":1312714,"date":"2026-01-20T03:31:23","date_gmt":"2026-01-20T00:31:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1312714"},"modified":"2026-01-20T03:31:23","modified_gmt":"2026-01-20T00:31:23","slug":"inalta-curte-demonteaza-manipularea-pe-pensii-iccj-reactioneaza-dupa-ce-a-fost-acuzata-ca-a-calculat-gresit-simularea-ce-arata-ca-pensiile-de-serviciu-ale-magistratilor-vor-fi-desfiintate-de","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1312714","title":{"rendered":"\u00ceNALTA CURTE DEMONTEAZ\u0102 MANIPULAREA PE PENSII \u2013 ICCJ reac\u021bioneaz\u0103 dup\u0103 ce a fost acuzat\u0103 c\u0103 a calculat gre\u0219it simularea ce arat\u0103 c\u0103 pensiile de serviciu ale magistra\u021bilor vor fi desfiin\u021bate de noua lege: \u201eExpertiza analizeaz\u0103 efectele legii \u00eentr-un scenariu maximal, pentru a verifica dac\u0103 pensia de serviciu \u00ee\u0219i p\u0103streaz\u0103 substan\u021ba juridic\u0103. Concluzia: chiar \u0219i \u00een ipoteza a unei major\u0103ri cu 100% a salariilor pe \u00eentreaga perioad\u0103 analizat\u0103, pensia de serviciu ram\u00e2ne inferioar\u0103 celei contributive\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u00ceNALTA CURTE DEMONTEAZ\u0102 MANIPULAREA PE PENSII \u2013 ICCJ reac\u021bioneaz\u0103 dup\u0103 ce a fost acuzat\u0103 c\u0103 a calculat gre\u0219it simularea ce arat\u0103 c\u0103 pensiile de serviciu ale magistra\u021bilor vor fi desfiin\u021bate de noua lege: \u201eExpertiza analizeaz\u0103 efectele legii \u00eentr-un scenariu maximal, pentru a verifica dac\u0103 pensia de serviciu \u00ee\u0219i p\u0103streaz\u0103 substan\u021ba juridic\u0103. Concluzia: chiar \u0219i \u00een ipoteza a unei major\u0103ri cu 100% a salariilor pe \u00eentreaga perioad\u0103 analizat\u0103, pensia de serviciu ram\u00e2ne inferioar\u0103 celei contributive\u201d<\/h1>\n
\n

Scris de: Valentin BUSUIOC | \"pdf\"<\/a> | \"print\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
19 January 2026 13:20<\/div>\n
Vizualizari: 1943<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n

\u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie \u2013 condus\u0103 de judec\u0103toarea Lia Savonea (foto)<\/span><\/b> \u2013 a demontat luni, 19 ianuarie 2026, o manipulare legat\u0103 de proiectul de lege privind pensiile de serviciu ale magistra\u021bilor.\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\n


<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Astfel, contrar a ceea ce a ap\u0103rut \u00een spa\u021biul public, ini\u021biativa de act normativ (aflat\u0103 acum pe masa Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Rom\u00e2niei) va anula de facto pensiile de serviciu ale<\/span>judec\u0103torilor \u0219i procurorilor, \u00eentruc\u00e2t, chiar \u0219i \u00een ipoteza major\u0103rii cu 100% a salariilor p\u00e2n\u0103 la sf\u00e2r\u0219itul perioadei analizate (2026-2067), pensia de serviciu va r\u0103m\u00e2ne inferioar\u0103 pensiei contributive. <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Iat\u0103 comunicatul ICCJ (vezi facsimil)<\/span>:<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201eClarificare public\u0103 \u00een problematica pensiilor de serviciu ale magistra\u021bilor: ce arat\u0103 expertiza \u0219i ce se spune public \u2013 dou\u0103 lucruri diferite<\/b><\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Afirma\u021biile cuprinse \u00eentr-un articol de pres\u0103 publicat ast\u0103zi, 19 ianuarie 2026, sunt neconforme cu concluziile expertizei \u0219i creeaz\u0103 o percep\u021bie eronat\u0103 asupra efectelor juridice ale noii reglement\u0103ri, impun\u00e2nd urm\u0103toarele clarific\u0103ri publice. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Expertiza nu \u2018denatureaz\u0103\u2019 \u0219i nu \u2018umfl\u0103\u2019 pensia contributiv\u0103, ci analizeaz\u0103 explicit efectele legii \u00eentr-un scenariu maximal, tocmai pentru a verifica dac\u0103 pensia de serviciu \u00ee\u0219i mai p\u0103streaz\u0103 substan\u021ba juridic\u0103. Concluzia expertizei este clar\u0103 \u0219i nu poate fi relativizat\u0103: chiar \u0219i \u00een ipoteza \u2013 nerealizat\u0103 \u00een practic\u0103 \u2013 a unei major\u0103ri cu 100% a salariilor pe \u00eentreaga perioad\u0103 analizat\u0103, pensia de serviciu ram\u00e2ne inferioar\u0103 pensiei contributive.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Simulare \u00een ipoteza unei major\u0103ri cu 50% a veniturilor<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

In<\/span>stan\u0163a de la c<\/span>ar<\/span>ese pe<\/span>n<\/span>sion<\/span>e<\/span>az<\/span>\u0103<\/span><\/i><\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Dif<\/span>ere<\/span>n<\/span>\u0163\u0103 \u00een m<\/span>inu<\/span>s f<\/span>a\u0163\u0103 de c<\/span>on<\/span>tr<\/span>ibu<\/span>\u0163ia pl\u0103tit\u0103<\/span><\/i><\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

J<\/span><\/i>udec\u0103<\/span>torie<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.209 lei<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Tr<\/span>ibunal<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.533 lei<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Curtede a<\/span>pe<\/span>l<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.478 lei<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00cen ipoteza major\u0103rii chiar cu 100% a veniturilor, pentru judec\u0103torii cur\u021bilor de apel ar semnifica o reducere de 1.772 lei a cuantumului pensiei de serviciu, \u00een timp ce pentru cei de la instan\u021ba suprem\u0103 reducerea ar fi de 1.223 lei \u00een raport cu contributivitatea.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Aceast\u0103 constatare are o semnifica\u021bie juridic\u0103 precis\u0103. Pensia de serviciu nu este doar diminuat\u0103 sau ajustat\u0103, ci devine inaplicabil\u0103 \u00een mod sistematic, \u00eentruc\u00e2t nu mai este niciodat\u0103 favorabil\u0103 beneficiarului. \u00cen aceste condi\u021bii, ea este anulat\u0103 \u00een mod efectiv, prin pierderea oric\u0103rei func\u021bii economice \u0219i juridice. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Prin urmare, nu ne afl\u0103m \u00een fa\u021ba unei simple reforme sau a unei rea\u0219ez\u0103ri a mecanismelor de calcul, ci \u00een fa\u021ba unei goliri de con\u021binut a pensiei de serviciu, incompatibile cu ideea men\u021binerii sale ca institu\u021bie juridic\u0103 distinct\u0103. Faptul c\u0103 aceast\u0103 concluzie rezult\u0103 chiar dintr-un scenariu extrem, ipotetic \u0219i favorabil, \u00eent\u0103re\u0219te caracterul s\u0103u definitiv.<\/span><\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Prezentarea acestor efecte ca fiind inexistente sau neglijabile reprezint\u0103 o distorsionare a concluziilor expertizei \u0219i induce publicul \u00een eroare. Din perspectiv\u0103 juridic\u0103, atunci c\u00e2nd o presta\u021bie este permanent subordonat\u0103 alteia \u0219i nu mai produce efecte \u00een nicio ipotez\u0103 rezonabil\u0103, ea este desfiin\u021bat\u0103 \u00een fapt<\/b>, indiferent de men\u021binerea sa formal\u0103 \u00een textul legii\u201d<\/span><\/i>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n


<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Un expert contabil consultat de Lumea Justi\u021biei a explicat:<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201eExpertiza trimis\u0103 de ICCJ la CCR a plecat de la estim\u0103ri pe variante evolutive, inclusiv estimarea cre\u0219terii de 100% a indemniza\u021biilor magistra\u021bilor \u2013 ceea ce este pu\u021bin probabil. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Constatarea r\u0103m\u00e2ne valid\u0103 \u00een ceea ce prive\u0219te faptul c\u0103, prin calcul, pensia de serviciu plafonat\u0103 la 70% din salariul net (astfel cum este prev\u0103zut \u00een proiectul de lege) este mai mic\u0103 \u00een cuantum dec\u00e2t cea contributiv\u0103 pentru persoane care au avut prelevate acelea\u0219i contribu\u021bii. Simularea arat\u0103 c\u0103 \u00een acest moment persoanele care intr\u0103 \u00een carier\u0103 vor avea anulat orice beneficiu al pensiei de serviciu la finalul carierei. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Varianta 1 de calcul a expertizei reprezint\u0103 aplicarea modelului matematic pe datele actuale, care sunt date certe, aplicate la prevederile legale ale legii pensiilor generale si cele din legea atacat\u0103. Aceast\u0103 variant\u0103 1 porne\u0219te de la faptul c\u0103 nici salariul mediu brut pe economie, nici cele ale magistra\u021bilor nu sufer\u0103 modific\u0103ri. \u00cen aceste condi\u021bii, calculul relev\u0103, de asemenea, o diferen\u021b\u0103 negativ\u0103 a pensiei de serviciu. Replic\u00e2nd modelul la orice dinamic\u0103 de cre\u0219tere propor\u021bional\u0103 at\u00e2t a indemniza\u021biilor magistra\u021bilor, c\u00e2t \u0219i a salariului mediu brut pe economie (varianta 1 av\u00e2nd cea mai mare probabilitate), concluzia r\u0103m\u00e2ne valid\u0103. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00cen ceea ce prive\u0219te afirma\u021biile din pres\u0103, ele sunt bazate pe o abordare selectiv\u0103: ele critic\u0103 ipotezele de lucru ale celorlalte variante (2 \u0219i 3), dar omit s\u0103 prezinte faptul c\u0103 modelul matematic de calcul pe datele la zi, dac\u0103 s-ar replica \u00een simetrie, va conduce la aceea\u0219i concluzie. De aceea, prima variant\u0103 a unei expertize opereaz\u0103 pe staus quo (adic\u0103 pe situa\u021bia existent\u0103), iar celelalte opereaz\u0103 doar cu ipoteze. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Mai mult: varianta 1 a expertizei ia \u00een calcul cre\u0219terea indemniza\u021biilor ca urmare a promov\u0103rii \u00een carier\u0103, ea oper\u00e2nd cu valoarea actual\u0103 a indemniza\u021biilor \u0219i cu valoarea actual\u0103 a salariului mediu brut pe economie. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

De aceea, concluzia tehnico-\u0219tiin\u021bific\u0103 a expertizei este clar\u0103 \u2013 \u0219i anume: pensia de serviciu ar urma s\u0103 fie mai mic\u0103 la finalul carierei dec\u00e2t cea a celorlal\u021bi contribuabili la contribu\u021bii egale\u201d<\/span><\/i>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n

Comentarii<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n

Adauga comentariu<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\":D\"\":lol:\"\":-)\"\";-)\"\"8)\"\":-|\"\":-*\"\":oops:\"\":sad:\"\":cry:\"\":o\"\":-?\"\":-x\"\":eek:\"\":zzz\"\":P\"\":roll:\"\":sigh:\"<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

DISCLAIMER<\/p>\n

Atentie! Postati pe propria raspundere!
Inainte de a posta, cititi aici regulamentul: Termeni legali si Conditii<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/article>\n

Source URL: https:\/\/www.luju.ro\/inalta-curte-demonteaza-manipularea-pe-pensii-iccj-reactioneaza-dupa-ce-a-fost-acuzata-ca-a-calculat-gresit-simularea-ce-arata-ca-pensiile-de-serviciu-ale-magistratilor-vor-fi-desfiintate-de-noua-lege-expertiza-analizeaza-efectele-legii-intr-un-scenariu-m<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00ceNALTA CURTE DEMONTEAZ\u0102 MANIPULAREA PE PENSII \u2013 ICCJ reac\u021bioneaz\u0103 dup\u0103 ce a fost acuzat\u0103 c\u0103 a calculat gre\u0219it simularea ce arat\u0103 c\u0103 pensiile de serviciu ale magistra\u021bilor vor fi desfiin\u021bate de noua lege: \u201eExpertiza analizeaz\u0103 efectele legii \u00eentr-un scenariu maximal, pentru a verifica dac\u0103 pensia de serviciu \u00ee\u0219i p\u0103streaz\u0103 substan\u021ba juridic\u0103. Concluzia: chiar \u0219i \u00een […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1312715,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[89],"tags":[114],"class_list":["post-1312714","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-romania","tag-luju-ro"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1312714","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1312714"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1312714\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1312715"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1312714"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1312714"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1312714"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}