{"id":1295963,"date":"2026-01-19T12:51:57","date_gmt":"2026-01-19T09:51:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1295963"},"modified":"2026-01-19T12:51:57","modified_gmt":"2026-01-19T09:51:57","slug":"o-noua-speranta-pentru-mama-indoliata-judecatoarea-elena-ciontea-de-la-judecatoria-sibiu-a-redeschis-ancheta-in-care-pensionara-maria-dambean-cere-de-14-ani-tragerea-la-raspundere-a-celor-vi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1295963","title":{"rendered":"O NOU\u0102 SPERAN\u021a\u0102 PENTRU MAMA \u00ceNDOLIAT\u0102 \u2013 Judec\u0103toarea Elena Ciontea de la Judec\u0103toria Sibiu a redeschis ancheta \u00een care pensionara Maria D\u00e2mbean cere de 14 ani tragerea la r\u0103spundere a celor vinova\u021bi pentru moartea fiicei sale, la 23 de ani. \u00cen 2024, procurorul Adrian Muntean de la PT Hunedoara a clasat dosarul cu o singur\u0103 fraz\u0103, prelu\u00e2nd pe nemestecate referatul cu propunere de clasare al poli\u021bistului judiciar. Instan\u021ba a dispus ca parchetul s\u0103 audieze legistul care a efectuat prima autopsie"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

O NOU\u0102 SPERAN\u021a\u0102 PENTRU MAMA \u00ceNDOLIAT\u0102 \u2013 Judec\u0103toarea Elena Ciontea de la Judec\u0103toria Sibiu a redeschis ancheta \u00een care pensionara Maria D\u00e2mbean cere de 14 ani tragerea la r\u0103spundere a celor vinova\u021bi pentru moartea fiicei sale, la 23 de ani. \u00cen 2024, procurorul Adrian Muntean de la PT Hunedoara a clasat dosarul cu o singur\u0103 fraz\u0103, prelu\u00e2nd pe nemestecate referatul cu propunere de clasare al poli\u021bistului judiciar. Instan\u021ba a dispus ca parchetul s\u0103 audieze legistul care a efectuat prima autopsie<\/h1>\n
\n

Scris de: Valentin BUSUIOC | \"pdf\"<\/a> | \"print\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
18 January 2026 13:36<\/div>\n
Vizualizari: 1614<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n

O nou\u0103 speran\u021b\u0103 pentru pensionara Maria D\u00e2mbean (foto 1)<\/span><\/strong> din Deva, care de peste 14 ani cere s\u0103 se fac\u0103 dreptate pentru decesul propriei fiice, Loredana, la numai 23 de ani.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Judec\u0103toarea Elena-Alexandra Ciontea de la Judec\u0103toria Sibiu<\/span><\/strong> a dispus la 12 decembrie 2025 redeschiderea dosarului de ucidere din culp\u0103 pe care, \u00een 18 decembrie 2024, procurorul Adrian-Valentin Muntean (foto 3)<\/span> de la Parchetul de pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 Tribunalul Hunedoara<\/strong> \u00eel clasase cu o singur\u0103 fraz\u0103, fostul anchetator DNA prelu\u00e2nd pe nemestecate referatul cu propunere de clasare \u00eentocmit de c\u0103tre poli\u021bistul Bogdan Pr\u0103datu de la IPJ Hunedoara<\/strong>. Lumea Justi\u021biei a prezentat ordonan\u021ba de clasare, men\u021bion\u00e2nd cu acea ocazie c\u0103 Muntean refuzase audierea medicului Claudiu Oiegar \u2013 legistul care efectuase prima autopsie a Loredanei D\u00e2mbean, \u00een 2011, imediat dup\u0103 deces (click aici pentru a citi)<\/a><\/span><\/strong>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Iar acum, odat\u0103 cu \u00eencheierea nr. 1670\/2025<\/strong>, emis\u0103 \u00een cauza nr. 1984\/221\/2025<\/strong><\/span>, judec\u0103toarea Ciontea a dispus ca parchetul s\u0103-l audieze pe doctorul Oiegar \u0219i s\u0103 cear\u0103 un aviz aprofundat de la INML.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00cencheiem, men\u0163ion\u00e2nd c\u0103 Maria D\u00e2mbean este ap\u0103rat\u0103 de c\u0103tre avocatul Cristian Zeiler (foto 2)<\/span><\/strong>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Iat\u0103 pasajul esen\u021bial din \u00eencheiere (vezi facsimil)<\/span>:<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201e<\/span><\/i>Judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 apreciaz\u0103 c\u0103 pl\u00e2ngerea formulat\u0103 este fondat\u0103, urm\u00e2nd a fi admis\u0103.<\/span><\/i><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Potrivit art. 285 C.p.p., urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103 are ca obiect str\u00e2ngerea probelor necesare cu \u00a0<\/span>privire\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>la \u00a0<\/span>existen \u0163a \u00a0<\/span>infrac \u0163iunilor,\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>la \u00a0<\/span>identificarea\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>persoanelor\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>care \u00a0<\/span>au \u00a0<\/span>s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015fit \u00a0<\/span>o infrac \u0163iune \u015fi la stabilirea\u00a0 <\/span>r\u0103spunderii penale a acestora, pentru a se constata dac\u0103 este sau nu cazul s\u0103 se dispun\u0103 trimiterea \u00een judecat\u0103.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Conform\u00a0 <\/span>art. 8 \u00a0<\/span>C.p.p., organele \u00a0<\/span>judiciare \u00a0<\/span>au\u00a0 <\/span>obliga\u0163ia \u00a0<\/span>de\u00a0 <\/span>a\u00a0 <\/span>desf\u0103\u015fura\u00a0 <\/span>urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103\u00a0 <\/span>\u015fi judecata \u00a0<\/span>cu\u00a0 <\/span>respectarea\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>garan\u0163iilor \u00a0<\/span>procesuale \u00a0<\/span>\u015fi \u00a0<\/span>a drepturilor \u00a0<\/span>p\u0103r\u0163ilor \u00a0<\/span>\u015fi \u00a0<\/span>ale subiec\u0163ilor procesuali, \u00a0<\/span>astfel\u00a0 <\/span>\u00eenc\u00e2t s\u0103 fie constatate la timp \u015fi \u00een mod complet faptele\u00a0 <\/span>care constituie\u00a0 <\/span>infrac \u0163iuni, nicio\u00a0 <\/span>persoan\u0103 nevinovat\u0103 s\u0103 nu fie\u00a0 <\/span>tras\u0103 la r\u0103spundere\u00a0 <\/span>penal \u0103, iar orice persoan\u0103 care\u00a0 <\/span>a s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015fit\u00a0 <\/span>o infrac \u0163iune s\u0103 fie\u00a0 <\/span>pedepsit\u0103 potrivit \u00a0<\/span>legii,\u00a0 <\/span>\u00eentr-un\u00a0 <\/span>termen rezonabil.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Curtea European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului a constatat prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea anterior indicat\u0103 c\u0103 \u00een cauz\u0103 a lipsit o anchet\u0103 efectiv\u0103 din partea organelor de cercetare penal\u0103 pentru stabilirea circumstan\u0163ele decesului fiicei reclamantei, re\u0163in\u00e2ndu-se \u015fi c\u0103 autorit \u0103\u0163ile interne au refuzat s\u0103 sesizeze Comisia superioar\u0103 medico-legal\u0103 (supra, pct. 14), acestea s-au bazat exclusiv pe ultima \u00a0<\/span>expertiz\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>\u015fi \u00a0<\/span>nu\u00a0 <\/span>au \u00a0<\/span>r\u0103spuns \u00a0<\/span>argumentelor \u00a0<\/span>reclamantei, \u00a0<\/span>\u00eentemeiate \u00a0<\/span>pe \u00a0<\/span>constat\u0103rile raportului \u00a0<\/span>de \u00a0<\/span>autopsie \u00a0<\/span>\u015fi \u00a0<\/span>ale \u00a0<\/span>celorlalte \u00a0<\/span>dou\u0103\u00a0 <\/span>expertize, \u00a0<\/span>care \u00a0<\/span>indicau \u00a0<\/span>o \u00a0<\/span>posibil\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>moarte violent\u0103, \u015fi, proced\u00e2nd astfel, nu au ac\u0163ionat pentru a clarifica\u00a0 <\/span>complet elementele esen\u0163iale ale anchetei, \u00een special circumstan \u0163ele \u00a0<\/span>\u00een care s-a produs traumatismul cranian eviden\u0163iat de autopsie \u015fi eventualul rol pe care l-a avut acesta \u00een embolia re \u0163inut\u0103 drept cauz\u0103 a decesului, \u00een cadrul ultimei expertize . (pct. 35).<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 observ\u0103 c\u0103, dup\u0103 admiterea revizuirii \u00a0<\/span>\u015fi reluarea astfel a urm\u0103ririi penale, au fost reaudia\u0163i mai mul\u0163i martori \u015fi a fost solicitat avizul Comisiei superioare\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>medico-legale\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>cu \u00a0<\/span>privire\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>la\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>expertiza\u00a0<\/span>medico-legal\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>nr.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>A5\/6556\/2017\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>din 20.10.2017,\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>\u0163in\u00e2nd\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>cont\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>de\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>concluziile\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>raportului\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>de\u00a0expertiz\u0103\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>medico-legal\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>nr. 161.144\/B\/22.05.2015 \u015fi ale expertizei medico-legale nr. 1926\/17.11.2015.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Astfel, la data de 09.02.2024, Comisia superioar\u0103 medico-legal\u0103 din cadrul Institutului Na\u0163ional de Medicin\u0103 Legal\u0103 Mina Minovici Bucure\u015fti a emis avizul expertizei medico-legale nr. A5\/6556\/2017 din 20.10.2017, preciz\u00e2nd, totodat \u0103, c\u0103 nu avizeaz\u0103 raportul de expertiz\u0103 medico-legal\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>nr.\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>161.144\/B\/22.05.2015\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>\u015fi\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>raportul\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>de\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>expertiz\u0103\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>medico-legal\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>nr. 1926\/17.11.2015, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103, \u00een urma analizei fotografiilor, inclusiv de la exhumare, nu s-au constatat fracturi la nivelul\u00a0 <\/span>calotei craniene,\u00a0 <\/span>ci doar \u015fan\u0163uri vasculare (f. 39 vol. II dosar urm\u0103rire penal \u0103).<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Cu toate\u00a0 <\/span>acestea, judec\u0103torul\u00a0 <\/span>re\u0163ine\u00a0 <\/span>c\u0103 organele\u00a0 <\/span>de \u00a0<\/span>urm\u0103rire \u00a0<\/span>penal\u0103 nu au\u00a0 <\/span>epuizat probatoriul ce putea fi administrat \u00een cauz\u0103, cu at\u00e2t mai mult cu c\u00e2t \u00een cauz\u0103 s-a constatat deja faptul c\u0103 petenta\u00a0 <\/span>nu a beneficiat efectiv de dreptul\u00a0 <\/span>la\u00a0 <\/span>o anchet\u0103 efectiv\u0103,\u00a0 <\/span>\u00een aspectul\u00a0 <\/span>s\u0103u procedural.<\/span><\/i><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

A\u015fa cum a stabilit \u015fi Curtea Europeana a Drepturilor Omului \u00een cauza Eugenia Laz\u0103r \u00eempotriva Rom\u00e2niei,\u00a0 <\/span>pct. 83, doar un raport\u00a0 <\/span>aprofundat \u00a0<\/span>dovedit \u015ftiin \u0163ific,\u00a0 <\/span>care\u00a0 <\/span>includea\u00a0 <\/span>o solu\u0163ie motivat\u0103 \u00een raport cu eventualele contradic\u0163ii \u00eentre avizele institutelor de rang inferior \u015fi \u00a0<\/span>care \u00a0<\/span>r\u0103spunde \u00a0<\/span>\u00eentreb \u0103rilor \u00a0<\/span>adresate\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>de \u00a0<\/span>parchet\/parte\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>sunt \u00a0<\/span>de \u00a0<\/span>natur\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>s\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>le \u00a0<\/span>inspire justi\u0163iabililor \u00a0<\/span>\u00eencredere \u00a0<\/span>\u00een\u00a0 <\/span>ac\u0163iunea\u00a0 <\/span>justi \u0163iei\u00a0 <\/span>\u015fi s\u0103 asiste \u00a0<\/span>organele \u00a0<\/span>judiciare \u00a0<\/span>\u00een\u00a0 <\/span>exercitarea func\u0163iilor \u00a0<\/span>lor \u00a0<\/span>(mutatis \u00a0<\/span>mutandis , Tysi \u0105c \u00eempotriva \u00a0<\/span>Poloniei ,\u00a0 <\/span>nr.\u00a0 <\/span>5410\/03<\/span>,\u00a0 <\/span>pct. \u00a0<\/span>117, \u00a0<\/span>CEDO 2007-IV).<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Or, \u00a0<\/span>\u00een \u00a0<\/span>cauz\u0103,\u00a0 <\/span>judec\u0103torul \u00a0<\/span>de\u00a0 <\/span>camer\u0103 preliminar \u0103,\u00a0 <\/span>lectur\u00e2nd\u00a0 <\/span>avizul \u00a0<\/span>emis \u00a0<\/span>\u00een \u00a0<\/span>cauz\u0103, constat\u0103 c\u0103 acesta se rezum\u0103 la o fraz\u0103, care \u00eens\u0103 nu explic \u0103, din punct de vedere \u015ftiin\u0163ific, diferen\u0163ele\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>constatate \u00a0<\/span>\u00eentre\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>expertizele\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>\u00eentocmite \u00a0<\/span>\u00een\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>cauz\u0103, \u00a0<\/span>diferen \u0163ele\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>\u015fi \u00a0<\/span>criteriile\u00a0 <\/span>\u00a0<\/span>de diferen\u0163iere \u00eentre \u015fan\u0163urile vasculare \u015fi fracturile la nivelul calotei craniene, aceste detalii fiind necesare pentru l\u0103murirea organelor judiciare \u015fi a justi\u0163iabililor,\u00a0 <\/span>persoane ce nu au cuno\u015ftin\u0163e de specialitate \u00een domeniul medical.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Totodat \u0103,\u00a0 <\/span>\u00een \u00a0<\/span>mod \u00a0<\/span>corect\u00a0 <\/span>a \u00a0<\/span>semnalat \u00a0<\/span>ap\u0103rarea \u00a0<\/span>faptul \u00a0<\/span>c\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>a r\u0103mas \u00a0<\/span>ignorat\u00a0 <\/span>Raportul medico-legal \u00a0<\/span>de\u00a0 <\/span>necropsie\u00a0 <\/span>nr. \u00a0<\/span>254.182\/A\/2011 \u00a0<\/span>din\u00a0 <\/span>27.01.2012 al \u00a0<\/span>medicului\u00a0 <\/span>legist \u00a0<\/span>Oiegar Claudiu, raport ce prezint\u0103 concluzii\u00a0 <\/span>diferite \u015fi contradictorii cu ultima expertiz\u0103 \u015fi avizul aferent \u00eentocmite \u00een cauz\u0103.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Aceste aspecte\u00a0 <\/span>trebuie\u00a0 <\/span>\u015fi pot\u00a0 <\/span>fi l\u0103murite\u00a0 <\/span>de\u00a0 <\/span>c\u0103tre organele \u00a0<\/span>judiciare \u00a0<\/span>prin\u00a0 <\/span>audierea medicului \u00a0<\/span>legist\u00a0 <\/span>Oiegar\u00a0 <\/span>Claudiu \u015fi prin\u00a0 <\/span>solicitarea \u00a0<\/span>Comisiei \u00a0<\/span>superioare \u00a0<\/span>medico-legale \u00a0<\/span>din cadrul Institutului Na\u0163ional de Medicin\u0103 Legal\u0103 Mina Minovici Bucure\u015fti a unui aviz aprofundat, care s\u0103 motiveze contradic\u0163iile\u00a0 <\/span>constatae prin expertizele \u00eentocmite \u00een cauz\u0103, \u015fi eventual, s\u0103 r\u0103spund\u0103 \u00eentreb\u0103rilor petentei.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Solu\u0163ia \u00a0<\/span>(de \u00a0<\/span>clasare\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>sau \u00a0<\/span>orice \u00a0<\/span>alt\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>solu\u0163ie) \u00a0<\/span>trebuie \u00a0<\/span>s\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>fie \u00a0<\/span>\u00eentemeiat\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>pe \u00a0<\/span>probele administrate iar organele judiciare trebuie s\u0103 motiveze \u00een mod corespunz\u0103tor, cu trimitere la toate \u00a0<\/span>probele\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>administrate, \u00a0<\/span>mai\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>ales \u00a0<\/span>\u00een \u00a0<\/span>situa \u0163iile\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>\u00een\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>care \u00a0<\/span>probatoriul\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>relev\u0103 \u00a0<\/span>concluzii contradictorii.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Judec\u0103torul\u00a0 <\/span>de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 observ\u0103 c\u0103 a trecut\u00a0 <\/span>o perioad\u0103 semnificativ\u0103 de timp de la\u00a0 <\/span>deces, fapt ce nu poate dec\u00e2t s\u0103 diminueze \u015fansele\u00a0 <\/span>afl\u0103rii\u00a0 <\/span>adev\u0103rului, \u00a0<\/span>\u00eens\u0103, \u00een contextul concret, autorit\u0103\u0163ile trebuie s\u0103 demonstreze c\u0103 au f\u0103cut tot ce este posibil pentru a clarifica circumstan\u0163ele mor\u0163ii, pentru a exclude un act criminal\u00a0 <\/span>\u015fi s\u0103 explice \u00eentr-o manier\u0103 rezonabil\u0103 rudelor celui decedat rezultatele anchetei, s\u0103 \u00eenl\u0103ture dubiile acestora.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Dreptul la via\u0163\u0103 reprezint\u0103 un drept fundamental al omului\u00a0 <\/span>care, prin importan\u0163a sa, dep\u0103\u015fe\u015fte sfera interesului personal, av\u00e2nd relevan \u0163\u0103 pentru \u00eentreaga societate.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Protejarea dreptului la via\u0163\u0103 este reglementat\u0103 prin norme interne, cele ale dreptului penal, ale Constitu\u0163iei Rom\u00e2niei, c\u00e2t \u015fi prin norme de drept interna\u0163ional. Conform art. 2 din Conven\u0163ia European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului, dreptul la via\u0163\u0103 al oric \u0103rei persoane este protejat prin lege.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Instan\u0163a European\u0103 a statuat \u00een mod constant \u00een jurispruden \u0163a sa c\u0103 dispozi\u0163iile art. 2 au \u00een vedere existen\u0163a unui mecanism\u00a0 <\/span>de desf\u0103\u015furare a unei anchete oficiale, independente, impar \u0163iale \u015fi efective cu privire la circumstan\u0163ele mor \u0163ii unei persoane, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t eventualele \u00eenc\u0103lc \u0103ri ale dreptului la via \u0163\u0103 care s-au produs s\u0103 fie sanc\u0163ionate.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00cen\u00a0 <\/span>toate\u00a0 <\/span>cazurile \u00a0<\/span>de\u00a0 <\/span>moarte\u00a0 <\/span>suspect\u0103 se\u00a0 <\/span>activeaz\u0103 obliga \u0163ia\u00a0 <\/span>statului\u00a0 <\/span>de\u00a0 <\/span>a angaja\u00a0 <\/span>o anchet\u0103 pentru l\u0103murirea condi\u0163iilor \u00een care a intervenit decesul \u015fi identificarea \u015fi pedepsirea persoanelor responsabile.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Conform jurispruden\u0163ei Cur\u0163ii, autorit\u0103\u0163ile na\u0163ionale competente trebuie s\u0103 dea dovad\u0103 de o diligen \u0163\u0103 \u015fi de o promptitudine exemplare \u015fi s\u0103 procedeze din oficiu la desf\u0103\u015furarea de investiga\u0163ii\u00a0 <\/span>proprii, \u00a0<\/span>spre\u00a0 <\/span>a determina circumstan\u0163ele\u00a0 <\/span>precise\u00a0 <\/span>\u00een\u00a0 <\/span>care\u00a0 <\/span>s-au\u00a0 <\/span>produs atingerile aduse vie\u0163ii persoanei.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Aceste exigen \u0163e se impun a fi respectate cu at\u00e2t mai mult \u00een prezenta cauz\u0103, dat fiind faptul c\u0103 instan\u0163a de contencios european a constatat deja o \u00eenc\u0103lcare a drepturilor petentei, probatoriul administrat ulterior redeschiderii urm \u0103ririi penale \u00een cauz\u0103 neav\u00e2nd aptitudinea de a l\u0103muri (cel pu \u0163in \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care este posibil) circumstan \u0163ele producerii decesului.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere considerentele expuse, \u00een temeiul art. 341 alin. 6 lit. b C.p.p. \u015fi art. 2 din Conven\u0163ia European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 va admite pl\u00e2ngerea formulat\u0103 de petenta D\u00c2MBEAN MARIA, cu domiciliul procesual ales la Cabinet avocat Zeiler Cristian, cu sediul \u00een Deva, str. C\u0103lug\u0103reni nr. 29, jud. Hunedoara.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Va desfiin\u0163a solu\u0163ia de clasare dispus\u0103 \u00een dosarul penal nr. 718\/P\/2016 al Parchetului de pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 Tribunalul \u00a0<\/span>Hunedoara prin\u00a0 <\/span>ordonan\u0163a din\u00a0 <\/span>data de 18.12.2024, men\u0163inut\u0103 prin ordonan\u0163a din\u00a0 <\/span>data de 20.02.2025,\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\u015fi va trimite\u00a0 <\/span>cauza\u00a0 <\/span>Parchetului \u00a0<\/span>de pe\u00a0 <\/span>l\u00e2ng\u0103 Tribunalul Hunedoara pentru completarea urm\u0103ririi penale.<\/span><\/i><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Organele de urm\u0103rire\u00a0 <\/span>penal\u0103 vor audia medicul legist Oiegar Claudiu \u015fi vor solicita Comisiei superioare medico-legale din cadrul Institutului Na\u0163ional de Medicin\u0103 Legal\u0103 Mina Minovici\u00a0 <\/span>Bucure\u015fti a unui\u00a0 <\/span>aviz aprofundat,\u00a0 <\/span>care s\u0103 motiveze contradic\u0163iile \u00a0<\/span>constatate prin expertizele \u00eentocmite \u00een cauz \u0103, \u015fi eventual, s\u0103 r\u0103spund\u0103 \u00eentreb\u0103rilor petentei.<\/span><\/i><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Desigur, organele de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103 vor putea administra orice alte mijloace de prob\u0103 vor aprecia necesare \u00een cauz\u0103<\/span>\u201d<\/span><\/i>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

sursa foto D\u00e2mbean: Replica de Hunedoara<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

sursa foto Muntean: Bihoreanul<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n

Comentarii<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n


\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t#
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tsantinela<\/strong>\"date\"
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t18 January 2026 15:03
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

“Aviz aprofundat ” de la INML ,ce inseamna asta ?? Audiezi un medic legist dupa 14 ani ca sa demonstrezi ce ? Omul va consulta documentele de atunci,daca sunt gasite si asta va spune,evident daca nu au aparut “probe ” noi.Nu dati sperante desarte bietilor oameni . <\/div>\n