{"id":1285202,"date":"2026-01-19T04:45:30","date_gmt":"2026-01-19T01:45:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1285202"},"modified":"2026-01-19T04:45:30","modified_gmt":"2026-01-19T01:45:30","slug":"kompromat-politic-pentru-parazitarea-justitiei-avocatul-cristian-winzer-denunta-operatiunea-contra-sefului-mj-radu-marinescu-nu-avem-de-a-face-cu-o-investigatie-jurnalistica-reala","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=1285202","title":{"rendered":"KOMPROMAT POLITIC PENTRU PARAZITAREA JUSTI\u021aIEI \u2013 Avocatul Cristian Winzer denun\u021b\u0103 opera\u021biunea contra \u0219efului MJ Radu Marinescu: \u201eNu avem de-a face cu o investiga\u021bie jurnalistic\u0103 real\u0103, menit\u0103 s\u0103 clarifice adev\u0103rul, ci cu o lovitur\u0103 mediatic\u0103, plasat\u0103 selectiv \u0219i strategic. Se urm\u0103re\u0219te ca Justi\u021bia s\u0103 fie acaparat\u0103 parazitar pt a fi utilizat\u0103 ca instrument politic. Se invoc\u0103 \u2018interesul public\u2019. \u00cen cazul lui Nicu\u0219or Dan nu exist\u0103 un mai mare interes public referitor la ale sale studii doctorale?\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

KOMPROMAT POLITIC PENTRU PARAZITAREA JUSTI\u021aIEI \u2013 Avocatul Cristian Winzer denun\u021b\u0103 opera\u021biunea contra \u0219efului MJ Radu Marinescu: \u201eNu avem de-a face cu o investiga\u021bie jurnalistic\u0103 real\u0103, menit\u0103 s\u0103 clarifice adev\u0103rul, ci cu o lovitur\u0103 mediatic\u0103, plasat\u0103 selectiv \u0219i strategic. Se urm\u0103re\u0219te ca Justi\u021bia s\u0103 fie acaparat\u0103 parazitar pt a fi utilizat\u0103 ca instrument politic. Se invoc\u0103 \u2018interesul public\u2019. \u00cen cazul lui Nicu\u0219or Dan nu exist\u0103 un mai mare interes public referitor la ale sale studii doctorale?\u201d<\/h1>\n
\n

Scris de: Valentin BUSUIOC | \"pdf\"<\/a> | \"print\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
12 January 2026 15:54<\/div>\n
Vizualizari: 2440<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
\n

Avocatul Cristian Winzer (foto)<\/span><\/span><\/b> a denun\u021bat luni, 12 ianuarie 2026, opera\u021biunea de compromitere a ministrului Justi\u021biei Radu Marinescu, acuzat c\u0103 \u0219i-ar fi plagiat doctoratul.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\n


<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Scopul final al acestei opera\u021biuni este acapararea parazitar\u0103 a Justi\u021biei (\u00een special a marilor parchete: PICCJ, DNA \u0219i DIICOT), pentru utilizarea ei ca instrument politic, acuz\u0103 Winzer.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Totodat\u0103, avocatul reclam\u0103 c\u0103 interesul public invocat \u00een cazul lui Marinescu este utilizat selectiv, din moment ce acela\u0219i interes public nu a fost vehiculat c\u00e2nd s-a pus problema verific\u0103rii tezei de doctorat a pre\u0219edintelui Nicu\u0219or Dan.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Iat\u0103 postarea lui Cristian Winzer de pe Facebook<\/a><\/span>:<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201eDespre kompromatul politic. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Sau despre folosirea selectiv\u0103, oportunist\u0103 \u0219i tic\u0103loas\u0103 a integrit\u0103\u021bii academice, ca evident\u0103 \u0219i nefireasc\u0103 form\u0103 de presiune.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

1.1. Un jurnalist lanseaz\u0103 puternice acuza\u021bii cu privire la pretinse abateri de la standardele academice \u00een preg\u0103tirea \u0219i redactarea unei teze de doctorat, \u00eentr-un context politic extrem de sensibil \u2013 f\u0103r\u0103 a oferi public vreo validare a \u2019investiga\u021biei\u2019 din partea unor institu\u021bii academice real abilitate cu o astfel de verificare. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Acuza\u021bia este prezentat\u0103 direct ca fapt compromi\u021b\u0103tor, iar nu ca suspiciune supus\u0103 verific\u0103rii.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

1.2. Sincronizarea perfect\u0103 (nici m\u0103car disimulat\u0103) confirm\u0103 c\u0103 \u2019demersul\u2019 nu vizeaz\u0103 ap\u0103rarea unor principii \/ valori \/ standarde academice \u0219i nu are rolul \/ scopul de informare public\u0103 \u0219i\/sau de clarificare a unei situa\u021bii de fapt supuse dezbaterii publice, ci exclusiv de compromitere a ministrului Radu Marinescu \u0219i de influen\u021bare direct\u0103 \u0219i iremediabil\u0103 a unui proces institu\u021bional aflat \u00een derulare (selec\u021bia \u0219i numirea procurorilor de rang \u00eenalt). <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

1.3. Din aceast\u0103 perspectiv\u0103, \u2019ancheta\u2019 nu reprezint\u0103 nicio descoperire, ci o veritabil\u0103 lovitur\u0103, plasat\u0103 selectiv, oportunist \u0219i tic\u0103los, ca form\u0103 de presiune public\u0103 \/ instrument politic. <\/span><\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Se \u00eencearc\u0103 tocmai inducerea ideii c\u0103 dac\u0103 ministrul care coordoneaz\u0103 selec\u021bia procurorilor pentru numirile \u00een func\u021bii de conducere la P.G., D.N.A. \u0219i D.I.I.C.O.T. (deci care are un rol esen\u021bial \u00een procedur\u0103) este \u2019compromis\u2019, selec\u021bia \u00eens\u0103\u0219i (prin contaminare) este compromis\u0103, trebuind a fi oprit\u0103 \/ delegitimat\u0103 \/ contestat\u0103 \/ reluat\u0103.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

1.4. Apare evident c\u0103, \u00een realitate, nu avem de-a face cu o investiga\u021bie jurnalistic\u0103 real\u0103, menit\u0103 s\u0103 clarifice adev\u0103rul, ci cu o lovitur\u0103 mediatic\u0103, plasat\u0103 selectiv \u0219i strategic, cu scopul de a influen\u021ba Justi\u021bia prin presiune public\u0103. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Iar scopul direct este de a bloca \/ de a submina \/ de a compromite procesul de numire a procurorilor \u00een aceste func\u021bii, (re)confirm\u00e2nd c\u0103 se urm\u0103re\u0219te (cu inten\u021bie direct\u0103, calificat\u0103 prin scop) ca Justi\u021bia s\u0103 fie acaparat\u0103 parazitar pentru a fi utilizat\u0103 ca instrument politic. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

1.5. Din perspectiv\u0103 obiectiv\u0103, avem astfel toate elementele definitorii \/ caracteristice ale kompromatului politic: (i) o acuza\u021bie moral\u0103 grav\u0103, (ii) o evident\u0103 lips\u0103 de validare institu\u021bional\u0103, (iii) o perfect\u0103 sincronizare strategic\u0103, momentul p\u0103r\u00e2nd a fi perfect calculat, (iv) un v\u0103dit scop de compromitere, respectiv (v) un inevitabil efect direct asupra unui proces institu\u021bional.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

P.S. \u00cen\u021beleg c\u0103 se invoc\u0103 \u2019interesul public\u2019, care ar trebui s\u0103 primeze \u00een orice analiz\u0103 \/ moment. <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Dar \u00een cazul lui Nicu\u0219or Dan nu exista \/ nu exist\u0103 un mai mare interes public referitor la ale sale studii doctorale \/ la a sa tez\u0103 de doctorat? <\/span><\/i><\/span><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Pentru c\u0103 acela\u0219i \u2019jurnalist\u2019, \u00eenlocuind verificarea cu nedisimulata admira\u021bie pentru profilul intectual al actualului pre\u0219edinte, ne spune c\u0103 NU are rost nici m\u0103car ini\u021bierea unei anchete \/ investiga\u021bii, pentru c\u0103 \u2019NU se \u00eendoie\u0219te\u2019 de acesta \u0219i de a sa deplin\u0103 corelare cu cele mai \u00eenalte standarde academice (deci (i) nu exist\u0103 urgen\u021b\u0103, (ii) verificarea NU este necesar\u0103, iar (iii) prezum\u021bia de integritate este acceptat\u0103 \/ validat\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 rezerve)…<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

#sil\u0103 #Numanipul\u0103rii\u201d.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n

Comentarii<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n


\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t#
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIsi<\/strong>\"date\"
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t12 January 2026 14:38
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>+2<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Super analiza!
\nSper sa \u00een\u021belega cat mai multi jocurile politice !!<\/div>\n