{"id":122467,"date":"2018-03-06T16:05:38","date_gmt":"2018-03-06T13:05:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=122467"},"modified":"2018-03-06T16:05:38","modified_gmt":"2018-03-06T13:05:38","slug":"opinie-separata-a-treia-lege-a-justitiei-integral-neconstitutionala","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=122467","title":{"rendered":"Opinie separat\u0103. A treia lege a Justi\u021biei, integral neconstitu\u021bional\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u00cen dezacord cu ceilal\u021bi judec\u0103tori ai Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, fosta \u0219ef\u0103 a \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie Livia Stanciu a considerat c\u0103 legea de modificare a Legii nr. 317\/2004 privind organizarea judiciar\u0103, g\u00e2ndit\u0103 \u00een Comisia Iordache \u0219i adoptat\u0103 de Parlament, ar fi trebuit declarat\u0103 \u00een \u00eentregime ca fiind neconstitu\u021bional\u0103. Este vorba de a treia lege din pachetul privind Justi\u021bia. \u00cen cazul celorlalte dou\u0103 – care modificau Statutul magistra\u021bilor, respectiv Legea de organizare \u0219i func\u021bionare a CSM – motiv\u0103rile au fost deja publicate, a\u0219a c\u0103 acestea reintr\u0103 \u00een zilele urm\u0103toare \u00een dezbaterea Comisiei conduse de Florin Iordache.<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u00cen opinia separat\u0103 formulat\u0103 \u00een cadrul motiv\u0103rii deciziei CCR<\/a> din 13 februarie, Livia Stanciu sus\u021bine c\u0103 unele modific\u0103ri aduse Legii nr. 317\/2004 sunt \u201elipsite de logica juridic\u0103 a unei reglement\u0103ri coerente\u201d, \u00een timp ce \u00een cazul altora \u201eeste imposibil de f\u0103cut o coroborare (…) care s\u0103 duc\u0103 la o concluzie logico-juridic\u0103\u201d.<\/p>\n

De asemenea, Stanciu a apreciat c\u0103, prin felul \u00een care a fost dezb\u0103tut\u0103 \u0219i adoptat\u0103 \u00een Parlament, a fost \u00eenc\u0103lcat principiul bicameralismului<\/strong> prev\u0103zut \u00een Constitu\u021bie, deoarece s-a apelat la \u201eo procedur\u0103 mixt\u0103, care nu cunoa\u0219te reglementare sau temei juridic<\/strong>\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201e\u00cen cadrul procesului legislativ desf\u0103\u0219urat la Senat a fost operat un num\u0103r de 25 de modific\u0103ri, complet\u0103ri sau abrog\u0103ri, dintre care 16 cu semnifica\u021bie deosebit\u0103 \u00een economia \u0219i filosofia legii. Toate aceste modific\u0103ri, complet\u0103ri sau abrog\u0103ri operate direct de Senat, f\u0103r\u0103 a fi supuse dezbaterii Camerei Deputa\u021bilor, deturneaz\u0103, fiecare \u00een parte, dar \u0219i \u00eempreun\u0103, \u00een totalitatea lor, voin\u021ba primei Camere sesizate, precum \u0219i scopul ini\u021bial \u0219i principal al propunerii legislative\u201d, argumenteaz\u0103 fosta \u0219ef\u0103 a ICCJ.<\/p>\n

\u00cen motivarea publicat\u0103 mar\u021bi, privind decizia adoptat\u0103 pe 13 februarie, CCR a ar\u0103tat c\u0103, at\u00e2ta timp c\u00e2t Constitu\u021bia stabile\u0219te ca judec\u0103torii \u0219i procurorii s\u0103 fie reprezentan\u021bi, \u00een egal\u0103 m\u0103sur\u0103, \u00een Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii, o lege nu poate institui o diferen\u021biere \u00een ceea ce prive\u0219te alegerea ca pre\u0219edinte al CSM<\/a>.<\/p>\n

De asemenea, CCR a constatat c\u0103 o comisie parlamentar\u0103 nu poate s\u0103 exercite competen\u0163ele unei structuri din cadrul puterii executive.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Source URL: https:\/\/www.digi24.ro\/stiri\/actualitate\/politica\/opinie-separata-a-treia-lege-a-justitiei-integral-neconstitutionala-890108<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00cen dezacord cu ceilal\u021bi judec\u0103tori ai Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, fosta \u0219ef\u0103 a \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie Livia Stanciu a considerat c\u0103 legea de modificare a Legii nr. 317\/2004 privind organizarea judiciar\u0103, g\u00e2ndit\u0103 \u00een Comisia Iordache \u0219i adoptat\u0103 de Parlament, ar fi trebuit declarat\u0103 \u00een \u00eentregime ca fiind neconstitu\u021bional\u0103. Este vorba de a treia lege […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":122468,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[11],"class_list":["post-122467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","tag-digi24"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=122467"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122467\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/122468"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=122467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=122467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=122467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}