{"id":115153,"date":"2018-06-21T14:30:50","date_gmt":"2018-06-21T11:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=115153"},"modified":"2018-06-21T14:30:50","modified_gmt":"2018-06-21T11:30:50","slug":"ccr-admite-sesizarea-pnl-si-usr-cu-privire-la-legea-finantarii-partidelor-politice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/?p=115153","title":{"rendered":"CCR admite sesizarea PNL \u015fi USR cu privire la legea finan\u0163\u0103rii partidelor politice"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry data-app-meta data-app-meta-article\" data-embed-base-url-canonical=\"https:\/\/www.digi24.ro\/embed\/stiri\/actualitate\/politica\/ccr-discuta-sesizarea-privind-finantarea-activitatii-partidelor-politice-950580\">\n<p data-index=\"1\"><strong><span lang=\"ro-RO\">Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei a admis, joi, sesizarea PNL \u015fi USR cu privire la modificarea Legii 334\/2006 referitoare la finan\u0163area activit\u0103\u0163ii partidelor politice \u015fi a campaniilor electorale<\/span>. A fost a doua oar\u0103 c\u00e2nd CCR a trebuit s\u0103 se pronun\u0163e asupra acestei legi, care a mai fost contestat\u0103 de c\u0103tre partidele de opozi\u0163ie, a fost declarat\u0103 neconstitu\u0163ional\u0103 de c\u0103tre Curte \u015fi apoi reexaminat\u0103 \u00een Parlament.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p data-index=\"2\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-949610\" src=\"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/nwm1zthmzjnmmwjjmtgxmmyxmtq0zjrmyjg4nzew-thumb_.jpg\" width=\"879\" height=\"727\" data-skip-htmlfix=\"1\" title=\"nwm1zthmzjnmmwjjmtgxmmyxmtq0zjrmyjg4nzew-thumb_\"><\/p>\n<p data-index=\"3\"><strong><span lang=\"ro-RO\">Actualizare 14:00.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><span lang=\"ro-RO\">Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei a admis, joi, sesizarea PNL \u015fi USR cu privire la modificarea Legii 334\/2006 referitoare la finan\u0163area activit\u0103\u0163ii partidelor politice \u015fi a campaniilor electorale, transmite Agerpres cit\u00e2nd surse din CCR.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p data-index=\"4\">Sesizarea asupra acestui act normativ a fost f\u0103cut\u0103 la CCR \u00een 15 mai de c\u0103re deputa\u0163ii\u00a0PNL \u015fi USR, care spun c\u0103 legea &#8211;\u00a0 declarat\u0103 neconstitu\u0163ional\u0103 de c\u0103tre Curte &#8211; a fost reexaminat\u0103 de c\u0103tre Parlament cu \u00eenc\u0103lcarea unei decizii a Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale din 2017.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"5\">Parlamentarii PNL \u015fi USR spun \u00een sesizare c\u0103 op\u0163iunea legiuitorului de a legifera \u00een materia \u00een care Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 a admis o sesizare de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate cu privire la o lege \u00een ansamblul s\u0103u presupune parcurgerea tuturor fazelor procesului legislativ prev\u0103zut de Constitu\u0163ie \u015fi de regulamentele celor dou\u0103 Camere ale Parlamentului, iar actul normativ a fost adoptat cu \u00eenc\u0103lcarea acestei decizii a CCR.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"6\">De asemenea, semnatarii sesiz\u0103rii mai arat\u0103 c\u0103 a fost \u00eenc\u0103lcat principiului suprema\u0163iei Constitu\u0163iei \u015fi respect\u0103rii legii \u015fi c\u0103 expunerea de motive a fost gre\u015fit\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 de la depunerea proiectului.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"7\">&#8220;Justificarea extrem de sumar\u0103 prev\u0103zut\u0103 \u00een expunerea de motive nu are nicio leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu obiectul reglement\u0103rii, iar abrogarea propus\u0103 urma s\u0103 aduc\u0103 modific\u0103ri importante \u00een privin\u0163a beneficiarilor legii, const\u00e2nd \u00een obligarea organiza\u0163iilor minorit\u0103\u0163ilor na\u0163ionale care au ob\u0163inut c\u00e2te un singur mandat s\u0103 \u00eendeplineasc\u0103 toate \u00eendatoririle legale care revin partidelor politice \u015fi altor organiza\u0163ii ale cet\u0103\u0163enilor care au ob\u0163inut numere mai mari de mandate. Aceast\u0103 necorelare dintre expunerea de motive \u015fi obiectul de reglementare real al propunerii legislative, care subzist\u0103 \u015fi \u00een raport cu forma final\u0103 a acesteia, fiind neremediat\u0103 p\u00e2n\u0103 la data adopt\u0103rii, reprezint\u0103 o grav\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103lcare a dispozi\u0163iilor art. 6 \u015fi art. 32 din Legea nr. 24\/2000 privind normele de tehnic\u0103 legislativ\u0103 pentru elaborarea actelor normative&#8221;, spun deputa\u0163ii PNL \u015fi USR.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"8\">Ei mai arat\u0103 c\u0103 abrogarea unui mare num\u0103r de alineate care prevedeau separat sanc\u0163iunea aplicabil\u0103 \u00een anumite situa\u0163ii, corelat\u0103 cu modificarea articolului referitor la sanc\u0163iunile contraven\u0163ionale \u00een sensul renun\u0163\u0103rii la trimiterile c\u0103tre alte texte din lege \u00een favoarea relu\u0103rii \u00een scris a descrierii faptelor respective, \u00eencalc\u0103 mai multe articole din Legea nr. 24\/2000 privind normele de tehnic\u0103 legislativ\u0103 pentru elaborarea actelor normative, precum \u015fi principiul calit\u0103\u0163ii legii, fiind introduse mai multe texte cu exprim\u0103ri interpretabile.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"9\">Camera Deputa\u0163ilor a adoptat pe 9 mai modificarea legii privind finan\u0163area partidelor politice, reexaminat\u0103 \u00een urma deciziei Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale. \u00cen noiembrie 2017, CCR a decis c\u0103 legea &#8211;\u00a0care permitea partidelor s\u0103 p\u0103streze sumele primite ilegal \u00een campanii &#8211; este neconstitu\u0163ional\u0103. \u015ei atunci, CCR a fost sesizat\u0103 de c\u0103tre\u00a0parlamentarii USR, PMP \u015fi PNL.<\/p>\n<p data-index=\"10\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> Source URL: https:\/\/www.digi24.ro\/stiri\/actualitate\/politica\/ccr-discuta-sesizarea-privind-finantarea-activitatii-partidelor-politice-950580<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei a admis, joi, sesizarea PNL \u015fi USR cu privire la modificarea Legii 334\/2006 referitoare la finan\u0163area activit\u0103\u0163ii partidelor politice \u015fi a campaniilor electorale. A fost a doua oar\u0103 c\u00e2nd CCR a trebuit s\u0103 se pronun\u0163e asupra acestei legi, care a mai fost contestat\u0103 de c\u0103tre partidele de opozi\u0163ie, a fost declarat\u0103 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":115154,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[11],"class_list":["post-115153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","tag-digi24"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=115153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115153\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/115154"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=115153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=115153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/analyse.optim.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=115153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}